|
|
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||
 |
 |
 |
|
||
 |
 |
|
|||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#201
06-25-2007, 04:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He so clearly adores Charles and I would imagine be very upset that there is any suggestion that his adored father isn't actually his biological parent. I do remember an article, I think by Richard Kay but may be mistaken, in which Kay actually refers to Harry giving Charles a hug and asking, 'Aren't you my Daddy?'. That image nearly broke my heart. Charles reported reply was something like 'Of course I am'. I wish I could find a reference to this article (or did I just dream that I read it?). 
|
|
#202
06-25-2007, 12:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree I really don't think that Diana would actually sleep with another man and pass him off as charles'. She just wasn't like that. Charles is Harry's biological dad and i know they all have sausage fingers it was commented on a show i watch a few days ago!
__________________
I think the biggest disease the world suffers from in this day and age is the disease of people feeling unloved. I know that I can give love for a minute, for half an hour, for a day, for a month, but I can give. I am very happy to do that, I want to do that.- Princess Diana
|
|
#203
06-25-2007, 12:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What is it with second sons in the royal family? Geez, these Hewitt-Harry ideas always remind me so much of the rumors about Prince Andrew and the Earl of Caernarvon. Why does the media pick on the second sons? Is it a "spare" complex they have?
__________________
~ Whatever you fight, you strengthen. What you resist, persists.
Eckhart Tolle A New Earth ~ Fight for what you want, not against what you don't want. ~ CT
|
|
#204
06-25-2007, 04:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
|
|
#205
06-25-2007, 04:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is your DNA test....
Prince Harry, my DNA test conclusively shows......... is the son of........
the late Diana, Princess of Wales and.......... PRINCE CHARLES!  It is with confidence that I say he has the Mountbatten lips, the Mountbatten ears, the Spencer hair, the Spencer shape of face, the Spencer nose, exactly the same shape and color of eyes that Prince Charles/Prince Philip have. Trust me, if you really look closely a pic of Harry and a pic of Hewitt together (not just a first or second glance, really look) you will see no resemblance at all.
__________________
~ Whatever you fight, you strengthen. What you resist, persists.
Eckhart Tolle A New Earth ~ Fight for what you want, not against what you don't want. ~ CT
|
|
#206
06-25-2007, 05:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
CasiraghiTrio, you of all people should know that the only person whose judgement, opinion or eyes to trust are your own!  Round and around and around.....
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
|
|
#207
07-01-2007, 01:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This afternoon I had the dubious pleasure of watching Fox News doing an article about "The Anniversary", the concert and the Princes.
 The unequivical statement that Harry was absolutely not Charles natural son (backed up with a very fuzzy photo of Harry, James Hewitt and his uncle Charles as they look now and a black and white photo of Diana as a young girl as "proof" of lack of Spencer genes), it happens in all the "Best Families" over there don't you know, stated their expert journalist.  I know, I know, 'expert journalist' is one of the most definitive oxymorons!  However, since this statement was preceded by the claim that 'Harry was admitted to rehab when he was 16, ya just gotta wonda dontcha! 
__________________
MARG "Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assualts of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|
|
#208
07-01-2007, 04:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's a very harsh assessment Marg. I'm sure they wouldn't say these things if they weren't true.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
|
|
#209
07-02-2007, 05:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
while i said i was open minded about the whole situation, i find it amazing that people can go on the record as being absolutely certain this. without a dna test no one can be absolutely certain.
__________________
Duchess
|
|
#210
07-11-2007, 09:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is just another way for the press and media to make money off of Diana's and Harry's names. In my opinion Harry is the son of Charles and not James Hewitt to me the only think those two have alike is their red hair which Harry gets from his mother's side. I know if Harry had been a brunett or blonde these rumors and claims would not be happening period. This has to be hard on Harry people making fun of him saying that James Hewitt is his father and not Charles the man he has come to know as his father and who is to me his biological father.
__________________
Take time to think before you do. Princess Kamorrisa de St.Cogo,Duchess van Coth Ind Savoy http://myspace.com/kamorrisa Last edited by Next Star; 07-11-2007 at 10:01 PM..
|
|
#211
07-11-2007, 09:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that it is very tacky to even discuss something like this. Let's just say that Harry is Hewitt's child--does anyone really think the Windsors' would admit that? Why are we even discussing something that can never really have a resolution that we would even know about? This is not a soap opera.
That being said, having looked at photos of all involved parties I have to say that except for the red hair and typically ruddy English complexion that there is no obvious resemblence between HRH Prince Harry and Hewitt. We can all dig up photos that show the two of them in similar poses and say "Oh my, the resemblence is uncanny" but it really isn't. Harry has Charles' eyes, nose, mouth, etc... and really favors him significantly. Oddly, he also favors an oil portrait of his grandfather (Earl Spencer) when he was quite young. He has the physical characteristics of both sides of his family--and by both I mean the Windsor-Mountbattens and the Spencers.
__________________
Janet "We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|
|
#212
07-11-2007, 10:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
For me the problem was solved long ago when seeing photos of Prince Harry as a child. He looked like Prince Edward (Earl of Wessex) at the same age. Other examples with me are Princess Alexandra and her niece Lady Ella. Look at a picture of Princess Alexandra then and you could swear it was Lady Ella (except for the fashion).
|
|
#213
07-11-2007, 11:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As Harry ages, his profile (especially his nosel) looks alot like Prince Charles. I'm sure it's been cleared up in their family long ago that Harry is Charles' son.
|
|
#214
07-11-2007, 11:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh my Lord...it has been proven time and time again. Diana DID NOT meet Hewitt till after Harry was born.
Prince Harry is Charles's son. The red hair is a Spencer trait. THESE ARE ALL PROVEN FACTS, GUYS. :-) Harry's facial bone structure is Charles's. His eyes are shaped like Charles's. I cannot even see a reason for this thread to be honest with you all.
__________________
Lady M
|
|
#216
07-12-2007, 12:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#218
07-12-2007, 02:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yup. Red hair is a Spencer characteristic. All red-headed in the world are not James Hewitt's sons and daughters...
Vanesa.
|
