The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #41  
Old 06-30-2019, 05:01 PM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 25,177
I much prefer St Georges Chapel as a venue for royal events and its nice and private too.
__________________

__________________

8th of January,2020 -Death of HRH The Infanta Doña Pilar of Spain, Duchess of Badajoz,Dowager Viscountess de la Torre
  #42  
Old 06-30-2019, 07:24 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 2,637
Rebecca English has more details on the christening this upcoming weekend. It will apparently not be held at St. George's Chapel but instead in the Queen's private chapel. That would definitely prevent the media from seeing anyone arrive. So it will be pictures released to the media and likely other shots on their account.

Though naturally this doesn't please some members of the press.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...by-Archie.html
__________________

  #43  
Old 06-30-2019, 07:40 PM
rominet09's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LIEGE, Belgium
Posts: 4,376
I really hope we will be gifted with some official pix….Now I respect their need to keep certain things private.
  #44  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:17 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 579
Good for the Sussexes. Their choice of the Queen's Private Chapel seems to be a good one, if it is true.
  #45  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:21 PM
Ista's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: the West, United States
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
Rebecca English has more details on the christening this upcoming weekend. It will apparently not be held at St. George's Chapel but instead in the Queen's private chapel. That would definitely prevent the media from seeing anyone arrive. So it will be pictures released to the media and likely other shots on their account.

Though naturally this doesn't please some members of the press.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...by-Archie.html
I wonder if this is accurate? If so, what a nice idea for a very intimate and private family ceremony. I'm still hoping we'll at least see a few of the the posed family photos, but it's possible we might not.
  #46  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:31 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilyflo View Post
There weren't tons of negative press for all the other royal Christenings that were completely private so why should there be for this one?
The only recent Christenings anyone really cared about the Cambridge kids. And William and Catherine gave the public and the photographers/reporters something to see, while keeping the actual ceremony private.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H View Post
I would assume they'll release some group pictures afterwards, like William and Kate did. Christenings here aren't the same sort of big event as weddings are: most people only invite a few close relatives and friends, and royal christenings certainly don't get televised.
I wouldn’t assume the Sussexes will follow the Cambridge model. We might get something more than from the “private citizens” of the Tindalls & Phillips, but I feel that would be their preferred model to follow at this point.
  #47  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:39 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,428
Lets's stick to discussing the Christening and not speculate about how the media will react to the event.
__________________
  #48  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:40 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
I honestly don’t think it’ll be either completely like the Cambridge model or Tindalls/Philips model. Meghan and Harry’s roles are different from both, and they understand that and find a compromise to reflect that. As a Sussex fan, I’ve not been disappointed to what I’ve gotten on celebratory events from them so far, albeit if different. I don’t feel like I’ve been denied anything. So my guess is that it’ll continue.
  #49  
Old 06-30-2019, 08:46 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,691
My guess is they will have a private baptism (perhaps in the Queen's Chapel so no one sees anything coming/going) and then release a photo or two to their IG account.

I don't see an issue with it. They are not obligated to share their private lives with the media.



LaRae
  #50  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:03 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 2,637
Based on Rebecca English's article and tweets it seems we will have official pictures released via the press and then maybe some more intimate ones via their Instagram. English seems to be under the impression that the press pack are fighting for at least one media agency to be allowed inside but I suspect that won't happen. They clearly want this as private as possible.
  #51  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:12 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 12,524
This sounds like this christening is going to be on a par with Louise and James' which also took place in the Queen's private chapel at Windsor. They were both 8th in the line of succession at the time of their baptism while Archie is 7 so it also makes sense.

Harry is the younger son of a future monarch. Edward is the youngest son of the present monarch. It seems more and more that Harry is following Edward's lead in how he wants his child raised.

This whole year to me has been about positioning William and Harry for their future roles - one as the future King with his own office and two large homes while the other has the one large home, an apartment at BP and the office being overseen by the main office at BP. Harry is being clearly positioned as the younger sibling ala Andrew, Edward and Anne while William is being given all the requirements of the future King.
  #52  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:18 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 10
The only photos that matter are the official portraits. So if we get those, seeing guests arrive or leave is hardly important

This whole press outrage is very reminiscent of the wedding/birth presentation press restrictions. For weeks before the events, the press whined about supposedly “no press allowed” but for both events PA/private photographers provided many good photos.

If the royal reporters/photographers want to complain about restrictions, they should frame their grievances better instead of trying to frame everything as “the public will miss out”. This dramatized conflict is between the press pack and the Sussexes NOT between the public vs Sussexes
  #53  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:29 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,704
Yep, I called yesterday. If the Sussex plan was to stay as private as possible for Archie's christening, I said it would more likely be held at the chapel inside Windsor Castle. And I was right. Having the christening take place at St. George's Chapel Windsor would have made it much more difficult to keep cameras away.

After the fire at Windsor Castle in 1992, Prince Philip was responsible for overseeing the restoration of the interior chapel. He also redesigned the stained glass windows in the chapel. I saw this discussed in the documentary,Windsor Castle: A Royal Year, originally released in 2006. Prince Philip takes viewers on a tour of the chapel and the wing that was restored and renovated after the fire.

After the leak about the christening, a number of reporters are once again bellyaching and whining about not having access! Stating that the christening is private is kind of silly because the other royal christenings were actually private too! The only thing we aren't going to see surrounding Archie's christening are the arrivals and the departures. Some photos will surely be released to the public afterward, so frankly that's not very different from what we got to see of the other recent royal baby christenings.

It's clear to me that Prince Harry ain't taking anything about his family lightly. He wants to keep his wife and his son to himself. And he has reason to desire to protect them and to fear for their safety in view of all this continued frenzy, hullabaloo and over-criticism of Meghan that's relentless in the media. Also, the leaking is not coming from the Sussex camp.
  #54  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:34 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,428
Closed until closer to the Christening.
__________________
  #55  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:48 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,704
It's quite possible that it won't be revealed who Archie's godparents are, since the tendency is very strong to keep as much about Archie's life as private as possible.

Whoever the godparents are, they have surely been selected by now.
  #56  
Old 06-30-2019, 09:56 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaiaMia_53 View Post
It's quite possible that it won't be revealed who Archie's godparents are, since the tendency is very strong to keep as much about Archie's life as private as possible. Whoever the godparents are, they have surely been selected by now.
It has been reported we will get photos. I don’t see any reason to think we’d not get names of godparents and photo with them. Louise and James has total private baptisms but we got photos and names.

I don’t see how much of his life you think they keep secret. He is a month old. We know as much as we did with Cambridge kids.

Godparents will have been selected long before now. Not something chosen last second. Especially as the godparents would need to arrange to be there.

It’s nothing new we don’t know names a week before.
  #57  
Old 06-30-2019, 10:27 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 5,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaiaMia_53 View Post
It's quite possible that it won't be revealed who Archie's godparents are, since the tendency is very strong to keep as much about Archie's life as private as possible. Whoever the godparents are, they have surely been selected by now.
In the Anglican Church of England, is there a time limit of when the godparents must be selected?
  #58  
Old 06-30-2019, 10:31 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
In the Anglican Church of England, is there a time limit of when the godparents must be selected?
That's up to the parents. The church just have to ensure the godparents are qualified under church rules.
  #59  
Old 06-30-2019, 10:32 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,704
I'm not saying that the godparents names won't be revealed, just that it's a possibility they won't be revealed, in order to protect the privacy of the godparents, and the privacy of the godparents' relationship with Archie.

The reason I say this is related to how the Sussexes have also sought to protect the privacy of Archie's and Meghan's medical professionals, etc.

Of course, it's not unreasonable to think the godparents' names will be revealed, but I just think the coverage of the Sussexes is currently in such a siege-like atmosphere that H&M may feel the less revealed, the better. Photos will surely be released of family members, not necessarily of the godparents.

I don't think the christening pictures will show us very much, since Archie will again be swathed in coverings. And granted, he's a baby in any case, so there's not really a lot to see.
  #60  
Old 06-30-2019, 11:06 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,492
The names of Louise and James’s godparents were released. I think not releasing the names will cause the rumor mill to go into overdrive and not be helpful to anyone.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Birth of Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor: May 6, 2019 JessRulz The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family 1473 01-20-2020 04:32 PM




Popular Tags
administrator aristocracy belgian royal belgian royal family chittagong countess of snowdon cover-up crown prince hussein's future wife crusades current events denmark duchess of cambridge duchess of sussex duke of sussex dutch royal family dutch royals family search french royalty future future wife of prince hussein germany house of bernadotte house of grimaldi house of orange-nassau jerusalem jumma kent kiko king philippe lithuania lithuanian palaces marriage mbs meghan markle monaco royal monarchist monarchy monogram mountbatten nelson mandela bay nobel prize norwegian royal family official visit pakistan popularity potential areas prince charles prince daniel prince harry princely family of monaco princess benedikte pronunciation qe2 queen mathilde queen paola rania of jordan romanov family rown shakespeare south korea spanish royal startling new evidence state visit sweden swedish history thailand united kingdom valois visit from sweden windy city


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×