Fred and Mary at Wimbledon. Fred is greeting Camilla
https://twitter.com/Gertsroyals/status/748509899550650368?lang=en-gb
https://twitter.com/Gertsroyals/status/748509899550650368?lang=en-gb
Is Mary there too? The photo of her is old.Fred and Mary at Wimbledon. Fred is greeting Camilla
https://twitter.com/Gertsroyals/status/748509899550650368?lang=en-gb
^^^ My bad. You're right, Fred is there but not Mary
Fred and Mary at Wimbledon. Fred is greeting Camilla
https://twitter.com/Gertsroyals/status/748509899550650368?lang=en-gb
The photos are charming, even though I think Mario Testino is severely overrated: always the same poses, and the photoshopping is just too much. These are healthy, well cared for, well groomed people (and children after all) and now they just look like... dolls or something. Absolutely unnecessary.
I also don't get why this whole Australian Vogue thing is needed. I would completely understand it if it were for Frederik & Mary's enthronement. (I know only F. succeeds his mother but let's face it, M.'s just as important for the media and image machine). Why does this family need such an exposure in Australian magazines (formerly also Woman's Weekly, Australian Vogue and German Vogue)?
It would be so interesting to know how this works exactly: who approaches whom and what are the advices given.
The photos are charming, even though I think Mario Testino is severely overrated: always the same poses, and the photoshopping is just too much. These are healthy, well cared for, well groomed people (and children after all) and now they just look like... dolls or something. Absolutely unnecessary.
I also don't get why this whole Australian Vogue thing is needed. I would completely understand it if it were for Frederik & Mary's enthronement. (I know only F. succeeds his mother but let's face it, M.'s just as important for the media and image machine). Why does this family need such an exposure in Australian magazines (formerly also Woman's Weekly, Australian Vogue and German Vogue)?
It would be so interesting to know how this works exactly: who approaches whom and what are the advices given.
I don't think the family "need" an exposure in Australian magazines. Why would they?I also don't get why this whole Australian Vogue thing is needed. I would completely understand it if it were for Frederik & Mary's enthronement. (I know only F. succeeds his mother but let's face it, M.'s just as important for the media and image machine). Why does this family need such an exposure in Australian magazines (formerly also Woman's Weekly, Australian Vogue and German Vogue)?
Simply because Mary still feels close to the country she was raised in. You take Mary out of Australia, but you cannot take the Australian out of Mary. Frederick himself has on my occasions spoken of the admiration he has for this country and how he cannot believe how quickly we have accepted him as one of us. He loves it here and loves the warmth of the people.The photos are charming, even though I think Mario Testino is severely overrated: always the same poses, and the photoshopping is just too much. These are healthy, well cared for, well groomed people (and children after all) and now they just look like... dolls or something. Absolutely unnecessary.
I also don't get why this whole Australian Vogue thing is needed. I would completely understand it if it were for Frederik & Mary's enthronement. (I know only F. succeeds his mother but let's face it, M.'s just as important for the media and image machine). Why does this family need such an exposure in Australian magazines (formerly also Woman's Weekly, Australian Vogue and German Vogue)?
It would be so interesting to know how this works exactly: who approaches whom and what are the advices given.
I don't think the family "need" an exposure in Australian magazines. Why would they?
Judging from the excerpt, this interview happend because of Copenhagen Fashion Summit (and WD2016 conference). Vogue and Mario Testino were at the summit, which Mary is patron of.
The interview took place just before the opening of the summit.
These interviews are not, IMO, done just for the sake of it and some nice pics. Mary does have something to say, which can't be said for all the royals who are in Vogue articles.
It's pretty obvious to me that this is about PR in Australia.
It's not something where M&F one day woke up and decided to appear in Australian Vogue. It's calculated and aimed at a certain segment of Australians and also as wide a segment as possible.
Over the years I've learned that while Women's Weekly and women's whatever would dream about an interview with M&F they are simply not serious enough to be trusted to write two serious sentences in a row.
And as for the Australian papers. While such an interview would be read, I don't think that it would hit right in the middle of the target audience in Australia. I.e. women.
So how serious is Vogue compared to other magazines in Australia?
Who are the readers?
Is Vogue considered trustworthy - again compared to other magazines?
How would the average reader react to this article in this magazine, rather than in another women's magazine?
- And here our Australian friends come in.
Thanks, CrownPrincessJava.
Most helpful.
I must confess that I don't know enough about Australian magazines to distinguish between them, so I didn't know Women's Weekly is more serious than the others.
I should very much like to read a summary. Hint, hint, Aussies.