I bet we will hear that at least one Danish journalist will report about "Nappygate" and the internet forums....
Well, everyone has the right to their own opinion and I see that you have yours -- mine is the opposite.The general question is: shoulnd't the Royal Family, or Mary and Fred in particular, be a role model in every aspect, even when it comes to the question of wearing fur?
As a member of a Royal family you make a statement with what you do. That would also include: having furniture made of tropical wood, wearing clothes that was made with childrens work etc., wearing diamonds that were produced by people living in slavery ( which happens nowadays). If you are wealthy and have access to all kinds of information plus you do charity worldwide, you must have a social conscience and be aware of what is happening in the world around you.
IMo wearing fur is not acceptable for a role model of the 21st century and someone who knows the facts of life.
I'm sorry, but it appears as if your theory, and the link that was used to support it, of this PR person helping out with the Tasmanian visit, and "tipping" off the media, has been debunked by the DRF themselves, as well as other published and reliable sources.
...........guess you are right! Perhaps even Facebook will be used again by this one Danish journalist.............
The general question is: shoulnd't the Royal Family, or Mary and Fred in particular, be a role model in every aspect, even when it comes to the question of wearing fur?
As a member of a Royal family you make a statement with what you do. That would also include: having furniture made of tropical wood, wearing clothes that was made with childrens work etc., wearing diamonds that were produced by people living in slavery ( which happens nowadays). If you are wealthy and have access to all kinds of information plus you do charity worldwide, you must have a social conscience and be aware of what is happening in the world around you.
IMo wearing fur is not acceptable for a role model of the 21st century and someone who knows the facts of life.
Yes, the royals should be role models in everything they do, because if they can not lead by example, we have,IMO, opinion not a lot of use for them. Personally, I think CP Mary needs to tone down her luxurious habits. No matter what side of the fence you are on in this fur debate, it simply does not look good that you dress your toddler in expensive fur vests, that you wear Prada from top to toe for the playground visits and that your 3-year old wears Louis Vuitton shoes. It is far too bling and an insult to the hardworking Danes, who in the end pay for these unnecessary excesses. You might argue that it is unfair that CP Mary can not dress herself and her children the way she wants to, but we live in a 24/7 news cycle and the royals are photographed and filmed everywhere they go - as CP Mary is well aware of!
Facebook is,FYI, a networking tool. Unfortunately a certain Aussie radiohost does not understand how it works, but I know that a certain Danish journalist is getting a clarification in this Sunday's paper and if this certain Danish journalist does not feel her name sufficiently exonerated, the matter will be taken further. The piece about Facebook and this certain Danish journalist was inaccurate, defamatory and actionable - as this certain Aussie paper is well aware of. Oh, enough about me!
Facebook is,FYI, a networking tool.
Yes, the royals should be role models in everything they do, because if they can not lead by example, we have,IMO, opinion not a lot of use for them.
Would the palace ever admit that theyr hired a PR-person to handle press during CP Mary's private family trip? Of course not? Naturally, they insist she is hired for the so called "official functions," they have to say that otherwise CP Mary would look really bad. Who else has debunked? The BB comment by Ms krakau does not debunk anything,IMO. On the contrary, it raises far more questions than it provides answers, like why was all the Aussie press already lined up inside the zoo, when BB's people turned up?
Facebook is,FYI, a networking tool. Unfortunately a certain Aussie radiohost does not understand how it works, but I know that a certain Danish journalist is getting a clarification in this Sunday's paper and if this certain Danish journalist does not feel her name sufficiently exonerated, the matter will be taken further. The piece about Facebook and this certain Danish journalist was inaccurate, defamatory and actionable - as this certain Aussie paper is well aware of. Oh, enough about me!
Defamatory? Inaccurate? Sounds like things that happen to Mary all the time. Perhaps she should start action against those who do the same to her.
Dressing a toddler in an expensive fur vest may not be the best idea, but she can hardly put her in a $20 chain store top either - there would surely be just as much fuss???
And I also feel that seeing as Mary is wearing Prada (& other designers), why should she take less 'care'/interest whatever in what her beloved children wear - especially in public?
I realise that these clothes will fit the children a lot shorter time, but I would still want my children to wear quality clothes, were I in her position.
What I am trying to say (with, I feel, limited success) is that maybe these designer labels are not necessary for the kids, but they still need to be respectable for their position.
Just MO.
No jet lag???Would the palace ever admit that theyr hired a PR-person to handle press during CP Mary's private family trip? Of course not? Naturally, they insist she is hired for the so called "official functions," they have to say that otherwise CP Mary would look really bad. Who else has debunked? The BB comment by Ms krakau does not debunk anything,IMO. On the contrary, it raises far more questions than it provides answers, like why was all the Aussie press already lined up inside the zoo, when BB's people turned up?
Bravo, Ma'am. Goodness knows if I were Mary, I'd take a leaf out of the Swede's book and fire back!
Yes, but most people tend to let ludicrous accusations go by, because they are so ludicrous and unbelievable. I do/would.
...several photo opps for a private holiday...
FYI - Linkedin is a much better networking tool than facebook, at least if you are looking for professional contacts, which generally speaking people are when speaking about networking. I don't consider a site that allows you to "throw" cows at people a networking tool, so much as a social friendship tool.
There was only one official photo opportunity for the family during the visit - the one at Government House in Sydney on Tuesday. The other times we got photos of Mary and the children where when they were being followed by the paps.
Well I would not call every journalist a paprazzi...
AF NIKOLAJ VRAA
FOTO: COLOURPRESS
Journalists are not photographers. Photographers are paparazzi. They are called that b/c they follow people around, photograph them in public and not at official events or photo requests. The journalistic equivelent is tabloid journalists.
Well, looking at all those paparazzi photo's I must say that Princess Mary doesn't do much to avoid their camera's, in fact she is looking straight into them at most of the pictures. I guess that these shoots can be called "unofficial photoshoots"?
Courtesy of the MSN Starlounge.
Mary, Christian og Isabella misbrugt i ble-reklame - MSN Starlounge
"Mary, Christian og Isabella misbrugt i ble-reklame- Mary, Christian and Isabella misused(abused) in nappy advertisement."
Does anyone know which news feeds and sources MSN.dk starlounge uses?
Is the main source Ritzau, or another news agency or media source or sources?
On the majority of pics I've seen of Mary, she is always looking at the camera, putting on her best smile. She seems to really enjoy being popular with photographers. At the very least, she is always ready for her photo to be taken. It's quite amazing.
Well she knows they are there so it is better to smile than make a nasty face or remark. All the Royal Princesses are the same way. It is part of their job for their country. At least Mary always looks nice and pleasant.On the majority of pics I've seen of Mary, she is always looking at the camera, putting on her best smile. She seems to really enjoy being popular with photographers. At the very least, she is always ready for her photo to be taken. It's quite amazing.
Journalists are not photographers. Photographers are paparazzi. They are called that b/c they follow people around, photograph them in public and not at official events or photo requests. The journalistic equivelent is tabloid journalists.