the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Weddings




Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 04-26-2004, 11:00 AM
mgrant's Avatar
mgrant mgrant is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, United States
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by irishchic5@Apr 25th, 2004 - 7:00 pm
I don't think the top of Mabel's dress was that bad, but that train was just terrible. I don't know what she was thinking. But, she has a lot to live up to with Maxima and Laurentein as her sisters-in-law. They are both very stylish.

I thought both Maxima and Laurentein looked absolutely beautiful. I can't believe Laurentein just had a baby! She looks wonderful!

I wish Johan Friso and Mabel many years of happiness. :flower:
Yeah. When I saw the couple walking down the aisle on CNN, I couldn't really make out what the gown was like. Overall, I thought she looked very pretty. Alexandra's pictures showed the details and oh my! there are certainly a lot of bows on her gown :P It's a different look from the classic looks of Maxima and Laurentein's gowns, but it's a good different look. I don't think I'd be able to pull it off since I'm not as tiny as she is but it works well for her. :flower:
__________________
Optime positum est beneficium ubi meminit qui accipit. Syrus, Maxims
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 04-26-2004, 11:20 AM
norwegianne's Avatar
norwegianne norwegianne is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northumberland, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,088
Send a message via AIM to norwegianne Send a message via MSN to norwegianne Send a message via Yahoo to norwegianne
Default

Well, the wedding dress has been disected, and I have nothing further to add there...

But didn't King Harald look elegant? I don't think I've seen him in a tux like that before. Plenty of uniforms, suits and other clothes, but *that* was one he looked very elegant in. And he looks relatively healthy and seems like he's enjoying himself. It's good to see him out and about again.

Really, all we do is discuss what the ladies wear... why not the men ? Some of them do dress up...
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 04-26-2004, 12:10 PM
Lady Jean Lady Jean is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: _, United States
Posts: 482
Default

I am not BOWled over by the beauty of this gown, but she sure made out in the jewels department. The Queen must really like her.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 04-26-2004, 04:49 PM
Bubbette Bubbette is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,259
Default

She looks just a little scary there. . .

well, if you call lying to the Dutch govt something that a highly educated person would do!

Last edited by Elsa M.; 08-13-2006 at 03:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 04-27-2004, 04:17 AM
Wisnu Wisnu is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 62
Default

How lucky queen Beatrix, she has 3 highly educated and independent daughter in laws.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 04-27-2004, 11:01 AM
karolinabraganza karolinabraganza is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 467
Default

i agree, i dont consider the third addition incredibly vituous.

however, from a purely education and achievement standard, beatrix did do well, all three daughters in law are very well educated and did something in their lives before they entered the royal house.

think of the poor norwegian couple: a pretty but uneducated mette-marit (the things she achieved are taking drugs and hopping at as many parties as possible, catching haakon was the best she did), ari behn is different, but i wonder how famous he'd be without the royal connection.

the danish didnt do so well: alexandra was very independent and successful in her own right, but mary...well, i wrote my share on her. same as mette, very sweet and perfect for the role (think of sweet but silly diana...), but not much behind her forhead, i suggest.

and imagine: if victoria marries her fitness trainer: good luck to the swedish reigning couple
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 04-27-2004, 12:14 PM
Xandra Xandra is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 110
Default

Oh gosh, the dress is really hideous. And the train is really like a clown suit, fit for a circus.

Strange...I used to think Mabel is very pretty...but on her wedding day, she looked really ...erm...
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 04-27-2004, 04:28 PM
mgrant's Avatar
mgrant mgrant is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, United States
Posts: 387
Default

I have a question and pardon me for looking at the ladies' apparel again :P I noticed that the brims on the hats are somewhat on the wide side. I've notice at some other royal weddings that the ladies' hat brims are very wide. Is that just a style or some sort thing that women of royalty do?

Also, what dictates the dress at a royal wedding? At Johan and Mabel's everyone is dressed as I would for a wedding (except for the hat, I don't like wearing hats ) While at others, the women wear gowns and tiaras, and the men are in tails. Is it the time of day of the wedding or the royal status of the couple being married?
__________________
Optime positum est beneficium ubi meminit qui accipit. Syrus, Maxims
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 04-27-2004, 06:44 PM
Alexandria Alexandria is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: , Canada
Posts: 4,049
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mgrant@Apr 27th, 2004 - 4:28 pm
Also, what dictates the dress at a royal wedding? At Johan and Mabel's everyone is dressed as I would for a wedding (except for the hat, I don't like wearing hats ) While at others, the women wear gowns and tiaras, and the men are in tails. Is it the time of day of the wedding or the royal status of the couple being married?
I think that the dress code, whether it is suits or gowns and tiaras depends on the time of the wedding, just as it does for non-royals! Johan Friso and Mabel had a morning ceremony with festivities going on into the early afternoon for example, in which it would be skirts, jackets and hats for the ladies and a morning suit/suit for men.

In the case of the two recent Norwegian weddings (Haakon and Mette-Marit, and Martha Louise and Ari) in which the ceremonies took place in the late afternoon/early evening, with festivities going on into night time, ball gowns and tiaras for the ladies, and tuxes for men would be standard.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:58 AM
Bubbette Bubbette is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,259
Default

The hosts say whether it is black tie, morning coat, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 04-28-2004, 01:29 PM
mgrant's Avatar
mgrant mgrant is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, United States
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Alexandria+Apr 27th, 2004 - 5:44 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Alexandria @ Apr 27th, 2004 - 5:44 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-mgrant@Apr 27th, 2004 - 4:28 pm
Also, what dictates the dress at a royal wedding? At Johan and Mabel's everyone is dressed as I would for a wedding (except for the hat, I don't like wearing hats ) While at others, the women wear gowns and tiaras, and the men are in tails. Is it the time of day of the wedding or the royal status of the couple being married?
I think that the dress code, whether it is suits or gowns and tiaras depends on the time of the wedding, just as it does for non-royals! Johan Friso and Mabel had a morning ceremony with festivities going on into the early afternoon for example, in which it would be skirts, jackets and hats for the ladies and a morning suit/suit for men.

In the case of the two recent Norwegian weddings (Haakon and Mette-Marit, and Martha Louise and Ari) in which the ceremonies took place in the late afternoon/early evening, with festivities going on into night time, ball gowns and tiaras for the ladies, and tuxes for men would be standard. [/b][/quote]
Thanks! :P
__________________
Optime positum est beneficium ubi meminit qui accipit. Syrus, Maxims
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 04-29-2004, 06:02 PM
samitude's Avatar
samitude samitude is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: , United States
Posts: 719
Default

I wasn't able to watch the wedding live so I have looked different places on the internet to watch the whole wedding. So far all I have found are a few little fragment clips, but not one or two video clips that show the entire wedding from beginning to end. I was able to watch the other weddings on the web after they took place. I wish I could see this one as well. Does anyone know of anything? I have combed throught the NOS site and I haven't found much. I was very surprised.
__________________
Sylvia M.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 04-30-2004, 04:41 AM
didem didem is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 265
Default

congratulations Mabel and Johan Friso

Mabel's wedding dress very very interesting
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 04-30-2004, 05:46 PM
helleniki helleniki is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Athena+Apr 24th, 2004 - 1:40 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Athena @ Apr 24th, 2004 - 1:40 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-helleniki@Apr 24th, 2004 - 1:21 pm
Very nice wedding pictures.

HM Queen Beatrix I of the Netherlands hat is simply fantastic, very very stylish; very typical in HM.

I didn't realize that a hat that looks like a bird's nest was so fashionable?! Call me crazy, but Queen Beatrix looks ridiculous! As for Laurentian (sp?) there are no words :woot: ! [/b][/quote]
Of course Queen Beatrix's hat is fashionable. HM is known to have such beautiful and stylish hats... This hat proves this...
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 04-22-2005, 01:49 PM
Josefine Josefine is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: , Sweden
Posts: 8,922
Default

Mable do have her own style
that i like about her
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:40 AM
misshelen's Avatar
misshelen misshelen is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 1,132
Default

Leaving the palace. ANP, Rex and unknown sources
Attached Images
File Type: jpg huwelijk1.jpg (101.3 KB, 53 views)
File Type: jpg 07aaa.jpg (64.6 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg 07.jpg (57.8 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg 59606206.jpg (25.4 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg 59606207.jpg (22.7 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (35.2 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg 59606208.jpg (13.3 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (55.4 KB, 49 views)
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:42 AM
misshelen's Avatar
misshelen misshelen is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 1,132
Default

Leaving the palace part 2. ANP, Rex and unknown sources
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 06.jpg (59.0 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg 59606209.jpg (14.4 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg 59606210.jpg (15.1 KB, 30 views)
File Type: jpg paleisuit2.jpg (15.9 KB, 29 views)
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:43 AM
misshelen's Avatar
misshelen misshelen is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 1,132
Default

Leaving the palace part 3 Hendrik Jan van Beek
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_2367.jpg (37.2 KB, 47 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2372.jpg (37.5 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2378.jpg (32.5 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2387.jpg (36.7 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_2389.jpg (36.8 KB, 39 views)
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:48 AM
misshelen's Avatar
misshelen misshelen is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 1,132
Default

Arrival Delft civil wedding part 1 without watermark ANP, Rex and unknown sources
Attached Images
File Type: jpg z-2936.jpg (46.1 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg auto.jpg (33.5 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg HuwelijkFrisoenMabel2004bewerkt20.jpg (34.3 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg burgelijk6.jpg (31.5 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg 757182_01.jpg (29.9 KB, 56 views)
File Type: jpg 756554_02.jpg (23.8 KB, 41 views)