![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Portal | Blogs | Articles | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
![]() |
|||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#381
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're welcome everyone, and I completely agree with Ghost Night, I think that these photos are really the first photos that I've seen where I could see Kate and Chelsy being the next Princesses (especially Chelsy). I think they proved themselves this day, and I think that Kate being able to be there by herself (without William) shows that she could do the kind of duties that would be required of the Princess of Wales. She needs to be albe to stand on her own two feet without William...
Last edited by randomlyKeira; 05-22-2008 at 02:56 PM. |
|
#382
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
.jmo
|
|
#383
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dunno if it proves she as in Kate in particular can be Princess of Wales but I meant she just looks the part appearance wise as I said we'll have to wait and see her actions once and if she gets the title.
|
|
#384
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Catherines' jacket is superb with all the detailing and such a pretty pink. I know I am very old fashioned, but I do wish we didn't have to see down their throats when they laugh! yuk
|
|
#385
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
MARG "Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assualts of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes |
|
#386
|
||||
|
||||
|
thanks for posting the photos of kate and chelsy at the wedding! it was the first time i saw this shot, i think they both looked adorable. chelsy's dress was extremely flattering and kate's hat and jacket were just delightful.
__________________
Sign the United Nations Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare: http://www.animalsmatter.org YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE! Feed an animal in need, click for free. http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Take some time to sign the petitions @: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/animal-welfare/all |
|
#387
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview. |
|
#388
|
||||
|
||||
|
They may well be annoyed too because the photos, especially of Kate, are not at all flattering and her huge open mouth looks terrible in most of the photos. A poor show altogether.
|
|
#389
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're very welcome! I really do wonder how long they are going to run with this, although I have to say William owes Peter a great deal of gratitude - his helicopter stunts are all forgotten thanks to this
![]() Quote:
|
|
#390
|
|||
|
|||
|
were there any pictures of the yorks at the reception??
|
|
#391
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#392
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think she looked very pretty. I do however, think that who ever did her make-up should have been a little more powerful with the brush!! On the eyes and some toned color on the lips would have done her well....IMHO
__________________
Lady Ann "Carry out a random act of kindness, with no expectation of reward, safe in the knowledge that one day someone might do the same for you." Diana, Princess of Wales |
|
#393
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x...edding/161.jpg what is sophie wearing on her head her hat choice gets bigger and bolder but not for the better it looks as if she can hardly keep her head straight because of the sheer weight of the thing glued to her ear
clearly she and bea are sharing the same advisor What really surprised me was the lack of a number of the royals - a list of the ones that didnt attend Duke and Duchess of Glouester Duke and Duchess of Kent Earl and Countess of St Andrew and family Lady Helen Taylor and Tim and family Lord and Lady Nicholas Windsor Princess Alexandra and her children and their families Prince and Princess Michael of Kent does anyone know of any more (apart from william of course) any ideas why?? Last edited by PrincessofEurope; 05-22-2008 at 05:04 PM. |
|
#394
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw the Hello! article via digital and I must say that it is much better than the magazine itself. Overall, I'm happy that I had a chance to read the story and view the up close images.
The couple look incredible together and I wish them much happiness.
|
|
#395
|
||||
|
||||
|
The couple in question did not feel obliged to attend this wedding or present reasons for doing so. Suffice it to say that Prince and Princess of Michael were in fact represented by their children, who belong to the same generation as Mr and Mrs. Philips do.
__________________
... perfection is "simplicity devoid of unnecessary elements"... Last edited by Al_bina; 05-22-2008 at 10:26 PM. |
|
#396
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can someone ID the kids in the family picture: http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x...edding/161.jpg
I know that's Charles Armstrong-Jones second from the right (looks just like his dad!) Is Margarita the little blonde girl? I wonder why Louise isn't in the family picture...
__________________
His sense of responsibility is not less than yours or mine. How could we tell right from wrong as simple people in any kind of situation? How could we know that our courage, loyalty and lives were not misused for evil purposes? |
|
#397
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#398
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have the magazine and I have to say the pictures are lovely. I especially liked the ones taken from above in the church.
However I have one problem and its just me being picky. But if you lifted a microscope you could just about make our Lady Louise Windsor in the church sitting between her parents. In the group picture with the family of both sides she wasn't sitting with all the other children of both families in the front even though her parents, aunts, uncles and cousins were all in the picture. I realise her parents want her kept out of the spotlight but would one family photo really hurt? |
|
#399
|
|||
|
|||
|
The pics in Hello! are lovely. Frogmore was the perfect venue for the reception too.
Shame we didn't see more of Lady Louise, especially as there were many children there. |
|
#400
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree..i would have loved to see louise but i hear that her parents took her home before the reception..thats why they werent on the stairs..i dont know if thats true but im sure her parents had their reasons
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Autumn Kelly Converts: Peter Phillips Keeps Place in Succession May 2008 | NotAPretender | The Princess Royal and Family | 107 | 10-17-2009 07:41 AM |
| Autumn Phillips's Fashion and Style Part 1: February 2008 - | PrincessofEurope | Royal House of Fashion | 44 | 07-19-2009 07:19 PM |
| Autumn Phillips Jewellery | PrincessofEurope | Royal Jewels | 64 | 09-02-2008 08:24 PM |
| Peter Phillips and Autumn Kelly to marry 17 May 2008 | suztav | The Princess Royal and Family | 315 | 05-17-2008 01:45 AM |