 |
|

10-03-2007, 04:32 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,709
|
|
|
i really like the picture in mtcbm's post of diana and the queen talking it shows that they had a perfectly normally mother/daughter-in-law relationship and what has been written about them is most likely rubbish
does anyone know the origins of the tiara worn by lady sarah was iot sold in the auction of her mother's possessions in june 06?
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

10-21-2007, 09:41 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 188
|
|
|
does anyone know the origins of the tiara worn by lady sarah was iot sold in the auction of her mother's possessions in june 06?[/quote]
This tiara was called "the Snowdon Floral tiara" or something to that effect. It was a gift from Antony Armstrong Jones to Princess Margaret on their wedding day. I don't know that the Princess ever wore it as a tiara, but it could be broken up into brooches, so perhaps she wore it in that form. Not sure if it was sold at auction--I hope not. It's really a lovely piece. Lady Sarah looked truly beautiful on her wedding day (second only to her mother, imo)
There was an amazing picture of her getting out of the car on her wedding day, surrounded by her bridesmaids all in white themselves. With those beautiful pastel flowers all around them fluffing her dress--my favorite picture!!
|

10-25-2007, 01:55 AM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Branson, United States
Posts: 81
|
|
|
No, the tiara wasn't sold at auction. Because it was a gift from Lord Snowdon, it would be considered a family heirloom, like the Spencer Tiara reverted to Charles, Earl Spencer after his father's death and was on loan to Princess Diana. It was loaned to Serena Stanhope, for the wedding and returned to Princess Margaret after it. With Princess Margaret's passing, the tiara would revert to Lady Snowdon (Serena) - as the wife of David, Lord Snowdon.
__________________
(Under Construction)
|

12-21-2007, 06:42 AM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: hangzhou, China
Posts: 61
|
|
|
I love her wedding dress!
|

12-24-2007, 05:03 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,709
|
|
|
Serena Linley did not wear the tiara on her wedding day that Sarah wore instead she wore a diamond and pearl tiara loaned from Princess Margaret
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

12-30-2007, 03:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,709
|
|
|
Serena wore the Papyrus Motive Tiara. This tiara was bought by Queen Mary from Garrard's. She later gave it to the Duchess of York later the Queen Mother. She in turn gave it to her daughter Princess Margaret. Serena borrowed the tiara for her wedding day.
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

01-27-2009, 05:14 AM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 75
|
|
|
Just seen the pictures again. This dress (and also the dresses and bouquets of the brides maids) are my all time favourites. This is a WOW dress (with capital letters).
she seems also a very lovely lady.
|

01-27-2009, 05:59 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 1,492
|
|
|
What a lovely bride and what a wonderful chance to view again that ceremony.
|

06-29-2010, 03:30 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: around the uk, United Kingdom
Posts: 198
|
|
|
Nice to see these pictures again , I think the tiara is still in the possession of Lady Sarah, but proberbly worn as brooches. Perhaps we will see it again in this form when any of their children marry
|

01-30-2011, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 195
|
|
|
Lady Frances Armstrong-Jones wore the Snowdon Floral Tiara on her wedding day (halfsister to Sarah)
|

02-12-2011, 08:31 AM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St Helens, United Kingdom
Posts: 281
|
|
|
As for the less-is-more look, I feel that such a look was great for a small, intimate ceremony but it's not a look that I'd choose for myself.
__________________
Princess Diana, the best Queen this country never had
|

03-14-2011, 12:48 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 668
|
|
|
Sarah was one of the most elegant royal brides. Her gown was simple, yet well-designed and reflects the bride very well. I also loved the complimentary gowns worn by her bridesmaids.
I would love to see Catherine Middleton wear something similar.
|

06-17-2011, 06:12 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,964
|
|
|
I really loved her dress.It has medieval feel to it.
|

06-17-2011, 06:36 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 9,839
|
|
|
Sarah (as evidenced by my sometime Avatar) looked absolutely beautiful on her wedding. I loved the simplicity and richness of the dress.
|

07-08-2011, 02:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,964
|
|
|
|

10-05-2012, 08:27 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,964
|
|
The Royal Order of Sartorial Splendor: Readers’ Top 10 Wedding Gowns: #9. Lady Sarah Chatto
Sarah's gown was simply beautiful. Her gown had elegance, timelessness, and romance. Love the corset bodice, the skirt, and train. It does have a great fluid movement. The tiara is lovely but I don't like the greenery with it. This would not be in my top 10 since it is very similar to Mette Marit's wedding dress and I much perfer her gown to Sarah's. Still, I think it's a very beautiful dress.
|

10-16-2012, 11:12 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 79
|
|
|
Sarah's gown was beautiful! Love the simplicity of it.
__________________
xeinacasaragi is a cunt
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|