the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > Royal Family of Belgium
Portal Royal Articles Royal Calendar Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read




Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2008, 07:38 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Picture of the Month Representative - Belgium
Articles Editor
TRF Author
Amsterdam - Netherlands
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,557
Default Dotations of Members of the Belgian Royal Family under Discussion

Parlament decided yesterday (18 april 2008) that of Phillipe and Mathilde's children only Princess Elisabeth will receive a dotation in the future, the others will have to provide an income themselves. Princess Astrid and Prince Laurent can keep there dotation for now, but a discussion about it will be reopened when the King turns 75 or if he dies before that age.

It seems that no senator actually looked at the 'work'that Astrid, Laurent and Claire do on behalf of Belgium, which is much larger than for example the two younger sons of the Queen of the Netherlands. Cutting allowances willcertainly stop such an involvment.

Senator Lambert also asked for the goverment to give an annual sheet with all the costs of the RF. He claims that this already exists in the Netherlands (which is not tru, but the government is working on it).

An article in Dutch here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2008, 11:29 AM
Nobility
Torrance - United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 400
Default

Marengo, are these dotations to Princess Astrid and Prince Laurent meant to cover their expenses when they're on royal duty?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:38 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Picture of the Month Representative - Belgium
Articles Editor
TRF Author
Amsterdam - Netherlands
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,557
Default

According to newspaper 'Het Laatste Nieuws' the dotation of Prince Laurent will be even more under discussion as the senate started an ad hoc advice group who will take a look at the dotations of the royals. Apparently some dotations will be decreased while others will disappear completely.

And no surprise: the Flemish parties will be proposing this while it is expected that the Walloon parties will block it. Newspaper ' de Morgen' calls it a new dilemma like Brussel-Halle-Vilvoorde, but that is over the top IMO, unless this issue will paralise Belgian politics for the next decade or so (which won' t happen of course).

Article in Dutch here.

And the original article in Dutch of 'De Morgen' here.

---

What I don' t understand is why the dotation of Prince Laurent is ' in danger' while they do not mention the one of Princess Astrid (who is in the same position as her brother).

Last edited by Marengo; 05-23-2008 at 06:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2008, 06:45 AM
norwegianne's Avatar
Administrator
Newsletter Editor
Copenhagen - Denmark
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,953
Send a message via AIM to norwegianne Send a message via Yahoo to norwegianne
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo View Post
Parlament decided yesterday (18 april 2008) that of Phillipe and Mathilde's children only Princess Elisabeth will receive a dotation in the future, the others will have to provide an income themselves. Princess Astrid and Prince Laurent can keep there dotation for now, but a discussion about it will be reopened when the King turns 75 or if he dies before that age.
It seems to be in line with what's happening in the Norwegian royal house, only they're instituting it themselves - and therefore have a lot more power over the proceedings.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2008, 08:41 AM
crm2317's Avatar
Courtier
Belfast - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 854
Default

So if Gabriel, Emmanuel and Eleonore do not receive an allowance from the state will they not take part in any royal duties? They will cease to be members of the royal family?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2008, 11:52 AM
Empress's Avatar
Administrator
Picture of the Month Coordinator
Book Club Coordinator
Ridgefield - United States
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,970
Default

I have a feeling that this is a temporary fix for a government that is in trouble, and they are trying to look good, although I suspect that this move will not make them look good in the least.

I don't see the siblings of Elisabeth being cut out entirely, as she will need help with Royal duties when she gets older. Nope, I just don't see this one as having staying power!
__________________
Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with TRF's Rules and Guidelines and FAQ

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:05 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Moderator
Esslingen - Germany
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 558
Default

Perhaps it will also be like in the Netherlands where only the reinging Monachrc and his/her spouse, the former monarch and his/her spouse and the heir and his/her spouse will get an allowance by the State. But the cots of official duties of the other members of the Royal House are covered by the King/Queen.
I think it is fair in the cases of Gabriel, Emmanuel and Eleonore that they know they will not get an allowance from the State. But for Laurent and Astrid it ist not as they had where not prepared for it in the way of their job-choice etc.
__________________
Stefan


Royal Travel and Events

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-24-2008, 12:11 PM
Courtier
Houston - United States
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 864
Default

This might be an instance in which Laurent's frequent bad headlines are causing Parliament to look for a way to ensure that future generations do not cause as many problems -- by forcing them to work.
__________________
Kelly D
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2008, 06:27 PM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Picture of the Month Representative - Belgium
Articles Editor
TRF Author
Amsterdam - Netherlands
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,557
Default

I agree, the most sensible thing for the future is to give the reigning couple and the direct heirs + spouses a dotation, and not the other children of the monrachs. I like how the dutch do it, just give the monarch a bit more and let he pay his relatives.
However I do not think that halfway the game you should change the rules. Astrid and Laurent planned their future, education etc. on the fact that they would be representing the RF and not have a normal job, so if they don' t get any money any more what should they do all of a sudden?

Last edited by Marengo; 05-25-2008 at 08:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2008, 11:52 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
Book Club Advisor
*** - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,358
Default

That's what they did in the UK when they shrank the Civil List a few years ago. Mostly it was a reaction against the younger royals, especially the Queen's younger children and their various spouses, but the Civil List was slashed so that long-term recipients like the Kents, Gloucesters, and Princess Alexandra, who had worked hard all their lives and, in the case of the Duke of Gloucester, given up a career to take on public duties, were all of a sudden cut loose. But the Queen is repaying them herself for continuing to take on public duties, so I assume there was some sort of agreement between her senior people and the Government that these junior royals wouldn't be left high and dry after all these years. The same is probably true of the Queen's younger children, who are continuing to perform public duties as they did while they were still on the Civil List. However, it does send a message to people like Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie that they might have to find other ways of supporting themselves when they get out of college. The chances are that they'll have a lot less involvement in royal life than the Queen's cousins did.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-25-2008, 02:45 AM
marmi's Avatar
Courtier
- - New Zealand
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 514
Default

I think its an interesting situation - I can see why they want to cut back but it is very difficult. If you cut the donation to the longer serving royals, do you increase the Queen/King's to recognised their increased expenses? And surely in doing so you'd eliminate the benefit of making the original cut...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who is your favorite member of the Belgian Royal Family? stephanievl Royal Family of Belgium 35 07-07-2008 08:14 AM
The Belgian Royal Family and the name Marie Empress Royal Family of Belgium 15 06-24-2008 04:39 AM
Members Of The Belgian RF As Children Cathérine Bergeyck Belgian Royal History 141 11-18-2007 08:15 AM
Dynastic History of the Belgian Royal Family Lila Rose Belgian Royal History 26 12-19-2006 06:51 PM
Belgian Royal Family Picture Thread Cathérine Bergeyck Royal Family of Belgium 21 08-06-2006 09:28 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement
Airstream Trailer Forum - Aquarium & Reef Forum
Royal Forum - Book and Reader Forum - Yoga Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Yoga Forum
Interference - U2, Pop Culture & Social Responsibility - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008
Jelsoft Enterprises
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0