Roslyn
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2006
- Messages
- 4,140
- City
- Tintenbar
- Country
- Australia
I can understand the Swedish people being dissatisfied with Madeleine's performance, but in my - foreigner's - mind, I distinguish between Madeleine and Chris and apply different tests. That's largely because one is royal and one is not, but also because I don't think of married couples as a single unit and I don't expect them to always go to events together.
Chris is not Royal, and obviously made a conscious decision to retain that status. I think that therefore he is free to live his life as he chooses without giving any explanations - public explanations, anyway - for why he is or is not at a certain public event. I suspect that being able to avoid having to turn up at all these sorts of things when they are not vitally important was one of the reasons he elected to remain a private citizen.
Chris runs a business and one which I imagine is demanding and time-consuming. I imagine he wants to be able to spend his treasured leisure time doing things he wants to do, and if his wife's family has some family thing on that is not something so important that he can't not go to it - like CP's wedding - and he doesn't really want to go to, preferring to give priority to his own mother's birthday, or even sitting around home watching TV or listening to music, whatever he chooses, I fully understand him declining it. There are going to be lots of things in the "I can't get out of it" category in his life, so he asserts his right to control what he does in his free time when he can. Maybe they have a list on the wall marking events in the Swedish royal calendar with category codes, from "can't miss at any cost" to "only if you really want to".
Chris is not Royal, and obviously made a conscious decision to retain that status. I think that therefore he is free to live his life as he chooses without giving any explanations - public explanations, anyway - for why he is or is not at a certain public event. I suspect that being able to avoid having to turn up at all these sorts of things when they are not vitally important was one of the reasons he elected to remain a private citizen.
Chris runs a business and one which I imagine is demanding and time-consuming. I imagine he wants to be able to spend his treasured leisure time doing things he wants to do, and if his wife's family has some family thing on that is not something so important that he can't not go to it - like CP's wedding - and he doesn't really want to go to, preferring to give priority to his own mother's birthday, or even sitting around home watching TV or listening to music, whatever he chooses, I fully understand him declining it. There are going to be lots of things in the "I can't get out of it" category in his life, so he asserts his right to control what he does in his free time when he can. Maybe they have a list on the wall marking events in the Swedish royal calendar with category codes, from "can't miss at any cost" to "only if you really want to".