The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #241  
Old 05-07-2015, 06:11 PM
JR76's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 1,167
Madeleine and Chris: Media Negativity and Public Opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocketmom View Post
Is there a reason people don't think Victoria and Daniel =will have any more children? Estelle is only 3. That's not a long time to wait before another pregnancy. Many people wait even longer. Was the first pregnancy difficult?

I'm not sure about how much we're allowed to speculate about pregnancies here on the forums but yes apparently Victoria did have a hard time conceiving and by now she almost 38. Adding to that is that many men afflicted with the same disease as Daniel have problems conceiving because of all the medicines they have to take.i


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
__________________

  #242  
Old 05-07-2015, 10:51 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 2,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by xenobia View Post
I have no problem with Chris running his own business and just showing up for a few important royal occasions. My problem is that he (just like Madeleine) seems to show up when it suits them, not when they can be expected to.

Take the Nobels. Madeleine chose not to attend in 2010 and 2011. In 2012, Chris was supposed to attend with Madeleine, but he excused himself just a few weeks be. The Nobel celebrations is one of the biggest (if not the biggest) occasions in the royal calendar. In 2013, Madeleine was heavily pregnant - a good reason not to attend. I have no problems with that. But showing up when they feel like it, not regularly, that isn't exactly what I expect from a princess of Sweden and her husband. Either you're in, or you're not.
And what do you base your opinion on that they only do as they please? The royal family and household is a tightly run operation so if you have inside information please share it with all of us.
__________________

  #243  
Old 05-08-2015, 03:56 AM
xenobia's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Near the artic circle, Sweden
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by grevinnan View Post
And what do you base your opinion on that they only do as they please? The royal family and household is a tightly run operation so if you have inside information please share it with all of us.
It's not just my opinion that they change their minds and/or show up when they like what's on the agenda. If you take Chris' participation in the Nobels, it was an official fact that he was supposed to be there for Nobel in 2012, and then cancelled very late. You just don't do stuff like that if you're not seriously ill or something similar.

Like I said many times before, I have no problem with both of them showing up just 2-3 times a year. But we need to know what we can expect from them. At this point, we can't.
  #244  
Old 05-08-2015, 05:48 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: N/A, France
Posts: 1,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocketmom View Post
Is there a reason people don't think Victoria and Daniel =will have any more children? Estelle is only 3. That's not a long time to wait before another pregnancy. Many people wait even longer. Was the first pregnancy difficult?
I do sincerely hope Victoria and Daniel will have more children. Without any problems, it can take two years before conceiving a child. I don't know - and don't want to know - whether and when Victoria and Daniel had the desire to give Estelle a sibling. I can only hope they won't go through hard times and processes.
  #245  
Old 05-08-2015, 06:15 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,554
Well, well biological clock is ticking...
  #246  
Old 05-08-2015, 07:43 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: bedford, United States
Posts: 1,368
We are not supposed to be speculating on who is pregnant and who is not I believe or pregnancy matters at all.
  #247  
Old 05-08-2015, 07:55 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biri View Post
Well, well biological clock is ticking...
Much as I am loathe to speculate, I do think a second child for V&D does increasingly appear unlikely.
  #248  
Old 05-08-2015, 09:16 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
Much as I am loathe to speculate, I do think a second child for V&D does increasingly appear unlikely.
In any case, the succession is reasonably secure with Estelle, Leonore and her soon-to-come sibling. CP is also getting married now and I assume he would like to have children of his own.
  #249  
Old 05-08-2015, 09:27 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
In any case, the succession is reasonably secure with Estelle, Leonore and her soon-to-come sibling. CP is also getting married now and I assume he would like to have children of his own.

I hope they are all close and spend time together an only child can become very lonely if they only mix with adults. I think it's great that Leonore and new baby are back home


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
  #250  
Old 05-08-2015, 12:58 PM
Muhler's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 9,724
Is it such a big problem?

V&D have proven that they can have children and should they have a few problems having one more the natural way, they can get help nowadays.
So I'd say we don't have to be concerned about Estelle being an only child until Victoria turns 45.
Also people "stay younger" nowadays. A generation ago a woman age 45 was from a childbearing point of view just one step away from the retirement home. Now a 45 year old having a child is just a bit mature.
  #251  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:13 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler View Post
Is it such a big problem?

V&D have proven that they can have children and should they have a few problems having one more the natural way, they can get help nowadays.
So I'd say we don't have to be concerned about Estelle being an only child until Victoria turns 45.
Also people "stay younger" nowadays. A generation ago a woman age 45 was from a childbearing point of view just one step away from the retirement home. Now a 45 year old having a child is just a bit mature.

Just because some people have babies at 45 doesn't mean anyone can. Most babies in older mothers are with donor eggs. I have had a lot to do via family with secondary infertility when you can have 1 or 2 babies but not anymore even after many attempts with IVF. It's a myth that any one at any age can have a baby using IVF. There are many many heart broken women believe me.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
  #252  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:20 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 2,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Just because some people have babies at 45 doesn't mean anyone can. Most babies in older mothers are with donor eggs. I have had a lot to do via family with secondary infertility when you can have 1 or 2 babies but not anymore even after many attempts with IVF. It's a myth that any one at any age can have a baby using IVF. There are many many heart broken women believe me.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
You are right Dear, and the percentage is very low, about 5%.
  #253  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:26 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: bedford, United States
Posts: 1,368
Plus the risk of birth defects goes up considerably;They have a beautiful healthy precocious little girl so it might not be worth the risk for them.
  #254  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:34 PM
Frelinghighness's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England, United States
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Just because some people have babies at 45 doesn't mean anyone can. Most babies in older mothers are with donor eggs. I have had a lot to do via family with secondary infertility when you can have 1 or 2 babies but not anymore even after many attempts with IVF. It's a myth that any one at any age can have a baby using IVF. There are many many heart broken women believe me.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
You are right about that thank you for bringing that up
  #255  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:47 PM
Muhler's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 9,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Just because some people have babies at 45 doesn't mean anyone can. Most babies in older mothers are with donor eggs. I have had a lot to do via family with secondary infertility when you can have 1 or 2 babies but not anymore even after many attempts with IVF. It's a myth that any one at any age can have a baby using IVF. There are many many heart broken women believe me.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
True, but that's not what I said.

I merely pointed out that it isn't a problem yet. And should V&D have problems they can get help.
When Victoria turn 45 without having become pregnant with the second child, then IMO we can talk about there being a problem.
For all we know V&D may have decided to wait three years before trying again and have their reasons for doing that.
While M&D apparently want their children as soon as possible. Each to their on IMO.
  #256  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:54 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler View Post
Is it such a big problem?
Also people "stay younger" nowadays. A generation ago a woman age 45 was from a childbearing point of view just one step away from the retirement home. Now a 45 year old having a child is just a bit mature.
From what I read in earlier centuries there were much more mothers who had their last children around age 45 (it was usually a child number 10+); having already grandchildren and a few babies in cemetery.
  #257  
Old 05-08-2015, 01:58 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhler View Post
Is it such a big problem?

V&D have proven that they can have children and should they have a few problems having one more the natural way, they can get help nowadays.
So I'd say we don't have to be concerned about Estelle being an only child until Victoria turns 45.
Also people "stay younger" nowadays. A generation ago a woman age 45 was from a childbearing point of view just one step away from the retirement home. Now a 45 year old having a child is just a bit mature.

I don't know if they are having problems having another child "the natural way", but, if they are, I personally think that, strictly from the point of view of the royal succession and the future of the monarchy, there is no need to seek any kind of "help". After all, they already have a daughter and a niece with an additional brother or sister soon to be born. If they still want to do it for personal reasons, I'm fine with that, but, having seen similar cases recently in my own family that resulted in difficult multiple pregnancies, I don't think it is worth the risk if you already have a child.
  #258  
Old 05-08-2015, 05:10 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,698
Doesn't the line of succession go: Victoria, Estelle and any future siblings, Carl Phillip and any children he may produce, Madeleine, Leonore and any future siblings?
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
  #259  
Old 05-08-2015, 05:30 PM
JR76's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
Doesn't the line of succession go: Victoria, Estelle and any future siblings, Carl Phillip and any children he may produce, Madeleine, Leonore and any future siblings?

Yes that's correct it does


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
  #260  
Old 05-08-2015, 07:14 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Springfield, United States
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
Doesn't the line of succession go: Victoria, Estelle and any future siblings, Carl Phillip and any children he may produce, Madeleine, Leonore and any future siblings?
That's how I thought it was. Similar to the U.K.
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
chris o'neill, princess madeleine


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania aristocracy best outfit best outfit october 2016 birthday catherine child christening crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess victoria crown princess victoria hats denmark duke of edinburgh europe fashion poll kate king abdullah ii marriage maxima in australia and new zealand monarchy monarchy versus republic natural disasters nobel 2016 november 2016 october 2016 parliament picture of the week prince charles prince philip princessanne princess marie princess marie eveningwear princess mary princess mary eveningwear princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia cocktail dresses queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia eveningwear queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen mathilde in jordan queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania fashion queen rania in australia rohan romanov royal wedding state visit succession sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises