In Denmark Mary had both her sisters as bridesmaids.
Autumn Kelly had Zara Philips as her maid of honor.
In Denmark Mary had both her sisters as bridesmaids.
IMO, it's normal and natural for a bride to have her sister as a Maid of Honour, and for a bridegroom to have his brother as a best man.
Phillippa is nearer to Kate than Zara; for Kate Zara will be a "borrowed" family.
I think the Zara reference was another example to show that sisters have been in the royal bridal party before. Zara, of course the sister of Peter when he married Autumn.
Honestly, I am a little taken aback by the notion that having one's sister as a maid of honor for a royal wedding is a "opportunistic form of nepotism." She's her sister for goodness sake.
Not at all surprised by Louise and Margarita. Though I am pleased as punch about Margarita...I knew she was going to be one!
Iluvbertie,
Beatrice and Eugenie York might as well not exist and that is a sad commentary on that situation..as this was perfect opportunity to have them.Lady Louise is a kind gesture and loving one. The Queen had bridesmaids that were all the same age. - young ladies etc...... I have to wonder whether Sarah will even show up-The decision to possibly have Catherine's sis there as bridesmaid might have called for a unified field in age-for the bridesmaids; this is all over the age board- mostly children and teenagers her sis may look like a sore thumb.. quite a mix-yet an opportunity to have Beatrice and Eugenie to participate for once and to possibly mend fences alas!
I do not see a peacemaker of initiative in the wedding arena.. one to unify rather than divide. These choices ingratiate the couple to the status quo and the notions that they are doing things their own way and with a hint of iconclasm is but a fallacy.Those are popular choices and not of precedence really. However it is their wedding and they are doing it as they please. It might be regarded as of form contemptuous selection and exclusion..and continuing the favoritism that prevails JMO
Lady Rose is an Astor.
Why is there no one from Kate's family included in the wedding party but her sister? It seems awfully dominated by William's side.
Why is there no one from Kate's family included in the wedding party but her sister? It seems awfully dominated by William's side.
I can picture it now: The two 3 yr olds followed by the 7 and 8 yr olds, then Pippa, then Kate.
Feel free to shoot me down here, because I don't have kids myself, but do you think the really young ones will cope with the occasion. I imagine it may be a little overwhelming, what with it being the wedding of the decade and probably billions of people watching all over the world.
Or will they be too young to care about the enormity, and just be carefree...
I must say I think it is lovely that Eliza Lopes will be a bridesmaid! She and Grace van Cutsem will look very cute together as will Lady Louise and Margarita.
I can picture it now: The two 3 yr olds followed by the 7 and 8 yr olds, then Pippa, then Kate.
How did Prince William handle being a pageboy at Andrew and Sarah's wedding, wasn't he around that age.
Feel free to shoot me down here, because I don't have kids myself, but do you think the really young ones will cope with the occasion. I imagine it may be a little overwhelming, what with it being the wedding of the decade and probably billions of people watching all over the world.
Or will they be too young to care about the enormity, and just be carefree...
How did Prince William handle being a pageboy at Andrew and Sarah's wedding, wasn't he around that age.
It was said that Diana had to lure him with M&Ms or some other form of candy so he would have to pay attention. He was a little fidgety in the chair during the ceremony, and was talking to the young girls sitting next to him.
Little children will behave....how they behave...all you can do is try and teach them and hopefully they will be good to go the day of the wedding..hahaha...