It's at about the 1:20 mark Lady Nimue.
Thank you, TLLK.
I wound up starting to watch it and then realized he began referencing them early in the video. Thank you. He does a very nice job in how he speaks of Charles in some detail. Never mentions Diana, just refers to 'parents'. Mentions 'grandparents' and then Philip. Gives the historical context for royal interest in charities going back to King George. Looks to me to be a nod to the men in the family, actually.
I'm so annoyed. I haven't really posted much about Duke of Cambridge but I was so so happy that his father got a mention..,I was actually thrilled. I even put good job Sir. A few hours later, I looked on Kensington Palace twitter and saw a pic (lovely it was) of two young boys with mum, nothing of father and I thought that's deliberate. Would it have been that hard to post another? Telling to me. I then looked at Clarence House twitter, and they must have been thrilled also for they posted the part of speech honoring dad. Its so telling to me. Earlier when I first joined, I posted something and mentioned I thought William was still seething and nothing has changed my opinion. Maybe this is OT but I am disappointed Lady Nimue.
I understand, Missjersey.
This mention was very heartening, like William has matured, what with being a father himself now. I would be inclined to take it as is, and not place too much on the Kensington twitter feed. William's mention was extensive.
Diana was a very possessive and jealous woman. Her 'boys' likely lived with that, trying always to placate her. Potentially any mention of 'papa' in a positive light ignited storms in Diana that had to be placated, so they are still doing that placating. I suspect there is guilt nested in there, too, like for William who was already in his teens and likely doing his push-back to 'mummy', trying to stand on his own without her smothering. I believe he openly argued with her just before her death. One can only suppose the conflict for him. This is all speculation, of course.
Bottom line is families have their dynamics The shock of losing her the way they did must have shattered deep. Who can blame them really? It is obvious that they carry scars. We can be happy that both men (finally) seem to have lucked out with their personal lives.
I think William being so direct at this time is perhaps an indication of familial healing though we will never know. It's definitely a sign of maturation. What we do know from what he said is that William is taking his position beside his father in the line of succession, and will be loyal to his father in the 'family business' of 'being royal'. That's really all we need from him, not so? The rest is personal. JMO.