 |
|

12-10-2012, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,685
|
|
|

12-10-2012, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 311
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
|
I think they will make smashing grandparents. But it is very sad that Princess Diana is not here to experience it - can you imagine the clothes she would buy this child if it's a girl???LOL
|

12-10-2012, 02:42 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
|
I can imagine them being brilliant grandparents. I'm sure we'll see lots of cute pictures after the baby is born!
|

12-10-2012, 02:59 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,685
|
|
People has an article entitled
Pink Offers Sympathy for Kate's Pregnancy Woes
though she doesn't actually mention the Duchess by name in the interview All it really says is this:
Besides that the rest is just about Pink and how she didn't have morning sickness instead she felt alot of rage.
|

12-10-2012, 03:12 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,685
|
|
|
Ya I know it's the first I've ever heard of a woman feeling rage during her pregnancy but I guess everyone is different idk
|

12-10-2012, 03:40 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 4,395
|
|
|
There seems to be an awful lot in the press these days about the Cambridges not having a nanny or at least not a full time one as if this is a fact. Have they ever actually said in an interview or released a statement saying this themselves or is it just a lot of speculation by the usual "palaces sources" starting all this up?
|

12-10-2012, 03:57 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Durham, United States
Posts: 362
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine
There seems to be an awful lot in the press these days about the Cambridges not having a nanny or at least not a full time one as if this is a fact. Have they ever actually said in an interview or released a statement saying this themselves or is it just a lot of speculation by the usual "palaces sources" starting all this up?
|
Maybe Jessica Hay knows and has told the media.
|

12-10-2012, 04:07 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 427
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine
There seems to be an awful lot in the press these days about the Cambridges not having a nanny or at least not a full time one as if this is a fact. Have they ever actually said in an interview or released a statement saying this themselves or is it just a lot of speculation by the usual "palaces sources" starting all this up?
|
Neither of them have ever said a word about this issue, to my knowledge, (and why on earth would they), but this is the sort of speculation that will quickly settle into "fact" and follow the couple, especially Kate, around until the end of time.
Case in point: Prior to getting married to Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark, Mary Donaldson gave an interview in which she said she and Frederik didn't plan on their children being "raised by nannies." Not once did she say they wouldn't HAVE nannies, and she also said that she would consider herself a working mother and that she realized she'd be in the fortunate position of having a lot of help, compared to most mothers, which to me if anything indicates that even at that time she knew she and Frederik would be employing help to look after their eventual children. A couple years later, Prince Christian is born, the family hires an extremely well qualified nurse to help care for him and the snotty comments started immediately about how Mary was a hypocrite for doing something she'd said she never would. Those sorts of comments still pop up to this day.
|

12-10-2012, 04:21 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,685
|
|
|
my grandma has a way of telling whether it's a boy or girl but I'll have to wait till Kate starts showing then I'll show her a pic of Kate and see what she says. So far she's never ever been wrong. Should be interesting to see if she once again gets it right.
|

12-10-2012, 04:27 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: IN THE CITY, United States
Posts: 842
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman
We also know Catherine has never smoked. She recently mentioned this on an official engagement.
|
I can remember when the Duke and Duchess were dating seeing pictures of the Duchess, open purse with a pack of ciggarettes in it and the press going nuts that she smoked... I guess they could have been someone elses and she was just holding them. Anyway, if she did smoke lets be thankful that she is not now...
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=duche...8&tx=113&ty=70
__________________
Lady Ann
Be the kind of women, that when your feet hit the floor each morning the Devil says "OH CRAP SHE'S UP!!!!!!"
|

12-10-2012, 06:37 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 325
|
|
|
[QUOTE="Lady Ann;1492261"]
I can remember when the Duke and Duchess were dating seeing pictures of the Duchess, open purse with a pack of ciggarettes in it and the press going nuts that she smoked... I guess they could have been someone elses and she was just holding them. Anyway, if she did smoke lets be thankful that she is not now...
LOL! Someone gave the Duchess of Cornwall their cigarettes to hold. Wouldn't believe it if my kids gave me that excuse, and I surely don't believe it here.
|

12-10-2012, 06:50 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 4,395
|
|
|
Not sure of the no support story is true, but if so it could be because the hospital is in London and the family live in Bristol. The hospital is establishing a fund for the family.
from the BBC
"King Edward VII's Hospital said it "has at all times offered to provide whatever assistance and support it can to Mrs Saldanha's family".
Her family made a private visit to the hospital on Monday, which has now set up the Jacintha Saldanha Memorial Fund. This will offer financial support to Mr Barboza and her children."
|

12-10-2012, 07:07 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGalitzine
There seems to be an awful lot in the press these days about the Cambridges not having a nanny or at least not a full time one as if this is a fact. Have they ever actually said in an interview or released a statement saying this themselves or is it just a lot of speculation by the usual "palaces sources" starting all this up?
|
The DM and the Telegraph have printed this story - the same story because they feed stories between each other.
Catherine and William do not talk to anyone about their personal lives - except perhaps their parents. This story, in my opinion, has been made up. Its like setting a trap *rather like the incident with CP Mary). The Cambridges will undoubtedly need a nanny and then the DM (followed by the Telegraph) will say that they have gone back on what they had said about bringing up their children "normally" without a nanny. As the majority of working mums in the Uk use nannies/au pair or child minders - that's a joke.
EDIT: Other papers will pick up on the story as well. If there is one thing about reporting that I would like is that they have to name their source - even if it is another paper. A give away is the suual "it has been reported" - that's another newspaper but they are never specific.
__________________
This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
|

12-10-2012, 08:19 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,057
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe
The DM and the Telegraph have printed this story - the same story because they feed stories between each other.
Catherine and William do not talk to anyone about their personal lives - except perhaps their parents. This story, in my opinion, has been made up. Its like setting a trap *rather like the incident with CP Mary). The Cambridges will undoubtedly need a nanny and then the DM (followed by the Telegraph) will say that they have gone back on what they had said about bringing up their children "normally" without a nanny. As the majority of working mums in the Uk use nannies/au pair or child minders - that's a joke.
EDIT: Other papers will pick up on the story as well. If there is one thing about reporting that I would like is that they have to name their source - even if it is another paper. A give away is the suual "it has been reported" - that's another newspaper but they are never specific.
|
This was well stated - and I agree completely. If anyone ever meets a "normal" child these days, please let me know.  Thank heaven, they and we are all unique!
|

12-10-2012, 08:37 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 439
|
|
|
Why are some people acting like they have never hold their friend items (wallet, keys, etc) in their purse for their friend? I have when I was carrying a bigger purse than my friends and we were going to the same events
|

12-10-2012, 08:46 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 5,907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess
I can imagine them being brilliant grandparents. I'm sure we'll see lots of cute pictures after the baby is born! 
|
I'm in agreement here. The Duchess of Cornwall is excellent with children, and the Prince isn't far behind. The baby will be very, very loved.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

12-10-2012, 10:31 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 6
|
|
|
The royal family seems to be doing a fairly first rate job of raising children, despite the difficulties of being in the public eye.
|

12-10-2012, 10:47 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 251
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS
The Hospital is getting fried in the press for not provinding counseling to the family of the nurse that died. Can some explain for those of us not covered by the NHS...
There are articles in the press about how the family of the nurse who died had not received an offer of counseling from the hospital.
Here in the US, counseling would be covered under our healthcare plan offered by our employer (if our employer offered one). Additionally most US employers have an additional service called an EAP (for Employee Assistance Program) that offers counseling for all the things employees run into in their lives. They can call the EAP and get limited help with everything from financial issues to a child having behavioral issues to depression. If the employer offers mental health care (and most that offer insurance do) and the issue needs more attention, the EAP can refer to providers.
In addition, many employers will offer special employee counseling (usually sourced through the EAP or the healthcare plan) for special workplace issues - a fire, a death at work, whatever. It's offered as a one off and is discretionary but deductible for tax purposes. Technically - it is for employees, but in special circumstances they will field relative calls and sort them out and refer to care givers. It also has significant PR value.
From a NHS coverage and business perspective - what is the prevailing practice for counseling in the UK when there is a work related death? Is the family usually counseled by employer provided services and if so is that through NHS - or is it an additional offering and what is customary for a significant employer?
Often as not here in the US, a family of an injured employee wants the employer to be hands off and prefers to make their own decisions about counseling. Of course, they want the tab to be picked up - but they often do not trust counselors offered by employers in these cases.
How is it different in the UK and with NHS?
|
Well, I am in the U.S. and we don't offer counseling to families of deceased employees. I just help them to fill out life insurance paperwork since I am the benefits person.
About 20 years ago I worked for a different college, and a coworker was murdered. They did bring in some counselors for us, but not the family. Where I am, at least, even EAP is only offered to employees, not their families.
So it surprises me that anyone expects the hospital to offer counseling to the family.
|

12-11-2012, 01:06 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brown, United States
Posts: 46
|
|
|
Grief counseling is part of the employee's life insurance policy for the surviving family members...
|

12-11-2012, 01:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,482
|
|
|
Every morning I wake up there's a story about Kate's illness and morning sickness. I'm getting really annoyed hearing about these stories. I'm happy for the couple but I don't know if I can handle another 7 or 8 months of continuous baby talk and talks of morning sickness! I don't mean to offend anyone, but this is all becoming too much.
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|