The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:20 PM
Lenora's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,057
As far as I 've read some time ago,on Facebook there was a blond woman under the same name as Kate's,her profile was deleted.Then it came on the surface that she is just another Kate Middleton in her own right.
What strikes me is that now on FB there is one or some Kates and I doubt anyone of them is Kate.So I do not understand why they stay on FB under a celebrity name,if the previous girl was not allowed.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 03-26-2011, 02:15 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 207
Well I suppose if their name is legitimately Kate/Catherine Middleton, it's a little harsh for them to be kicked off facebook simply because they share their name with a famous person (unknowingly of course since these people's parents obviously wouldn't have known a Kate Middleton would become famous later in life )

What should be (& probably is) done is facebook organisers/whoever runs that thing should ask the various Kate Middletons to prove they are who they say they are privately to them & just let that be enough. If anyone is attempting to pretend to be KM then sort that out but if they're just using facebook legitimately for themselves & just happen to share a famous person's name & are making no attempt to fool anyone else into thinking they are that famous person then I think facebook should leave them alone, they can't help what they were called! Lol!
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 03-26-2011, 02:50 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: not far from Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 648
These persons have perhaps also a 2nd christian name and could use that one for the FB.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:11 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilla
These persons have perhaps also a 2nd christian name and could use that one for the FB.
Why should they? If Catherine Middleton is their name, they shouldn't have to change it because there is now a Catherine Middleton who will one day be the future Queen.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:50 PM
Mia_mae's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SP, Brazil
Posts: 1,092
Perhaps some of those profiles also named "Kate Middleton" or "Catherine Middleton" display themselves as "not her"/ or not really her" while the other one, the ones of "real " Catherine's Middleton, who obviously never intended to be mistaken by PoW future bride, didn't even thought about it. I'm just guessing here, but sure the Facebook people, should be more careful. with all the money they earn, you'd think they could take a more carefully look.
__________________
There's not much of a difference between a stadium full of cheering fans and an angry crowd screaming abuse at you. They're both just making a lot of noise. How you take it is up to you. Convince yourself they're cheering for you. You do that, and someday, they will - Sue S.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 03-31-2011, 08:34 PM
MRSJ's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,844
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-research.html

How Kate Middleton is also related to George Washington....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 04-01-2011, 06:01 PM
MRSJ's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,844
Kate's favorite burger is 805 calories!

http://m.usmag.com/v/CelebNews/KateM...d37e2714a2ddc3
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 04-01-2011, 08:44 PM
Zonk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 10,211
I realize that we are all excited to share information on Catherine but if we can stop double posting (i.e. posting the same information in a variety of different threads) that would be GREATLY appreciated.

One time is fine

Zonk
__________________
.

Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 04-04-2011, 08:19 PM
zembla's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camden, United States
Posts: 875
The Newsweek article on Kate actually has new info--surprisingly. But it actually doesn't paint a great picture of Charles and Camilla--they come off catty, prissy and snobby, especially in regards to the Middletons.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 04-05-2011, 05:16 AM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by zembla View Post
The Newsweek article on Kate actually has new info--surprisingly. But it actually doesn't paint a great picture of Charles and Camilla--they come off catty, prissy and snobby, especially in regards to the Middletons.
Are you able to provide a link to the Newsweek article?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 04-05-2011, 10:18 AM
windsorgirl's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel View Post
Are you able to provide a link to the Newsweek article?
Kate Middleton: The Commoner Who Could Save the Foyal Family - Newsweek

(Excuse Newsweek's misspelling in the link)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 04-05-2011, 10:48 AM
christinacg's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by windsorgirl View Post
Thats a terrible article IMO. Filled with things the author can only assume or imagine. I thought Newsweek was more reputable than your average tabloid.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 04-05-2011, 11:28 AM
muriel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,074


Many thanks for posting the Newsweek link
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 04-05-2011, 11:58 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by christinacg View Post
Thats a terrible article IMO. Filled with things the author can only assume or imagine. I thought Newsweek was more reputable than your average tabloid.
All things could be read before in the Daily Mail - but are assumptions more than verified information. In addition the author put some negative slants to it. Eg that Camilla was amused to hear the Middletons visited her old home was printed but I read nowhere that she was catty because of that as claimed here. Plus it is known that Charles, while being very concious of his station and social position, is never unkind or unpolite to people. He expects people who are employed as servants to serve but he does not treat them with disrespect. He is open and friendly to people he meets on official engagements. So while the Middletons need not become part of his inner circle of friends, why should he be anything but kind and attentive to the parents of his son's chosen bride and treat them with the respect due to them?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 04-05-2011, 12:16 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vernal, United States
Posts: 36
I think we all need to be grateful that we are able to participate at all! Obviously he is HER choice and she is HIS choice. We should be happy for them, not trying to figure out what fault either have that is new and interesting. The article was not that well written or informative. It seems to have been stitched together with a lot of speculation and un-named sources (always suspicious of those!). Congratulations Will and Kate!! Many years of adventure and happiness await!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 04-05-2011, 01:36 PM
Zonk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 10,211
I wasn't impressed with the Newsweek article either.

They really haven't told US (by US I mean TRF members and those who follow the BRF) anything that we haven't already known in the last 8 years. I agree that the snarky comments about Charles and Camilla were totally uncalled for. Sounds like the author did a google and read some Daily Mail, Sun and Daily Mirror articles and that was about it.

I also loved the implication that Kate was going to save the BRF. Not to get into comparisons but they certainly said that in the past about a blonde and a redhead. While Kate will certainly be a welcome addition to the family and there are certain things that can and should be changed...its not about Kate. Its about Charles and William.
__________________
.

Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 04-05-2011, 02:34 PM
KittyAtlanta's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 2,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by christinacg View Post
Thats a terrible article IMO. Filled with things the author can only assume or imagine. I thought Newsweek was more reputable than your average tabloid.
Not for many years. It is now a magazine with an agenda.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:14 PM
ZaJa's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York , United States
Posts: 121
Newsweek is owned by Tina Brown who is high on tabloid talk mixed with news.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:17 PM
ZaJa's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York , United States
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zonk View Post
I wasn't impressed with the Newsweek article either.

They really haven't told US (by US I mean TRF members and those who follow the BRF) anything that we haven't already known in the last 8 years. I agree that the snarky comments about Charles and Camilla were totally uncalled for. Sounds like the author did a google and read some Daily Mail, Sun and Daily Mirror articles and that was about it.

I also loved the implication that Kate was going to save the BRF. Not to get into comparisons but they certainly said that in the past about a blonde and a redhead. While Kate will certainly be a welcome addition to the family and there are certain things that can and should be changed...its not about Kate. Its about Charles and William.
They say this all the time. I subscribe to the Nook version of the magazine and I lol when I saw the cover. She looks great but Catherine is not going to change much. I say that as a realist. The media does this with every marriage. I recall reading how Queen Elizabeth II's marriage and reign was supposed to be the new Elizabethan Age. Talk about hype! The reality is some small things might change but they will have to evolve and change as a whole. No one person is going to do that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:54 PM
1222's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Warren, United States
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zonk View Post
I wasn't impressed with the Newsweek article either.

They really haven't told US (by US I mean TRF members and those who follow the BRF) anything that we haven't already known in the last 8 years. I agree that the snarky comments about Charles and Camilla were totally uncalled for. Sounds like the author did a google and read some Daily Mail, Sun and Daily Mirror articles and that was about it.

I also loved the implication that Kate was going to save the BRF. Not to get into comparisons but they certainly said that in the past about a blonde and a redhead. While Kate will certainly be a welcome addition to the family and there are certain things that can and should be changed...its not about Kate. Its about Charles and William.



I so agree with you. Its just article to sell copies of Newsweek,with the wedding so close.
__________________

__________________
Ellen
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chelsy davy, kate middleton, lady kitty, princess diana, spencer family


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
General News and Information for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family Zonk The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 1494 10-17-2014 10:21 AM
General News & Information about Prince Albert & Princess Charlene Part2: March 2012- iceflower Prince Albert and Princess Charlene 606 10-14-2014 11:02 AM
General News and Information for the Duke of Cambridge Zonk The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 100 10-08-2014 04:19 PM
Victoria, Daniel and Family, General News Part 2: September 2010 - June 2014 Marengo Current Events Archive 679 06-02-2014 09:38 PM
General News & Information: Prince Albert & Princess Charlene 1: July 2011 - Feb.2012 iceflower Prince Albert and Princess Charlene 843 03-01-2012 03:38 AM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria dutch royal history engagement fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympic games olympics ottoman poland pom pregnancy prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess laurentien princess mabel princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess of asturias queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]