The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #401  
Old 04-13-2011, 10:21 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ****, Canada
Posts: 1,506
I agree wholeheratedly with every single post Iluvbertie has made and I do so because he has been a valid and excellent contributing member for ages on this forum with the truth of his own opinion unabashedly expressed. That is democracy. I happen to agree- and I am grateful for someone being so frank and having the courage to put it in writing.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #402  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:09 AM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
While I can kind of understand what Iluvbertie is saying, I have to respectfully disagree. Each Queen Consort/ princess in the UK and in other countries have played major roles in influencing charities, public opinion, and the fashion of the day as well as shaping women's roles and views and world views. Yes, they do give birth to the heir, the spare, and the extras, their role is far more important. Look at Queen Alexandra, Queen Mary, The Queen Mum, Diana, Grace Kelly, Queen Sophie, Princess Alexandra.... on and on women, queens, princesses who have influenced and contributed greatly to their country and are remembered and admired not for just being the mothers of furture monarchs, but their own contributes to society as well.I think we should all be careful about the comments we make because you come off a bit snobbish and rude to say the least.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #403  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:30 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,717
Like everyone else, except Jaya, you have missed the point that I am saying.

The roles that you describe are a choice not an 'official role'.
The only one with an official role in Britain is the Queen.
If the others did nothing nothing would change but if the Queen didn't fulfil her 'official duties' then the government would cease to operate.

That is the point - the others choose to do something but there is nothing laid down about what they have to do - Kate could decide to literally do nothing - no patronages, no public appearances, no fashion statements and what would change - the popularity of the monarchy might suffer but in reality nothing would change - as long as the Queen and in time Charles and William are able to write their names when required nothing needs to change if Kate decided to sit on her backside in Wales and never leave the home.

She has no 'official role' - just like Charles, William etc at the moment. Only the Queen has an 'official role' - and to me that is the point.

Queen Victoria said it best when asked what role the Prince of Wales would fulfil after his marriage - 'there is no official role for the Prince of Wales' - and she didn't give him anything to do for that very reason - he had no official role. The same today - Charles has no official role to play - he has chosen to create a role for himself but it isn't an 'official' role.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #404  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:36 AM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
OHHH okay now I get your point. My apologises.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #405  
Old 04-14-2011, 12:50 AM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
My only question to this and I do agree with your points. Is then a coronation as Queen Consort an "official" act or not? I know its way down the line and anything can happen between now and then. Just wondering.
That's a good question. I know most monarchs have been crowned with consorts, but before that it was up to the monarch themselves whether they chose to crown the spouse. In my opinion, it's a courtesy thing and only official in the sense of the title they go by. Being crowned a consort doesn't necessarily subject you to duties and an official role. I think the importance of duties have come into play sense most of the monarch's powers have been stripped and they have to form a new role so to speak if that make sense. I believe that's what Iluvbertie is saying I could be wrong.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #406  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:01 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 4,184
Ahhhh ya caught me! Actually I went back and deleted that post after I thought about it. Of course the coronation is official and she's Queen Consort but that doesn't define her role as Queen Consort. This is the point that Iluvbertie is putting across. As far as the role of the monarchy in the UK, the only official role that means anything is the Queen's (and after the coronation of William and Catherine... William's).

Every one has "roles" in life. Its been a good lesson I think and once again Iluvbertie has taught this old goat something. I love reading the thoughts that come out with these discussions.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #407  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:04 AM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
I was wondering! I knew I wasn't crazy! That makes sense. I wasn't sure is you meant official role or title wise.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #408  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:26 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
If the Queen does nothing the government couldn't function - hence my view that only the Queen has an 'official role'.
Charles and DoE are appointed members of the queen's Privy Council, thus have official roles within the monarchy. Other members of the RF in line of the succession who are over 21 are appointed to official roles as well (can't find the exact term at the moment).

But of course Catherine will have no such official role at first. But why is there a need to be so aggressive about that? Like when KittyAtlanta states that this means in her opinion that Catherine will not do more than she needs to do? And if so, as she has no official role and her husband can support her out of his own means without needing money from the taxpayer, so why not? Why be so unkind to this charming bride even before she had the time to do "nothing"?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #409  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:29 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 4,184
Yes.. Councillors of State I believe it is.

To be honest about William and Kate, I think they are going to be seen over the years as a team. For a while they will be low level such as Edward and Sophie are now. I simply cannot picture William with the attitude of "you walk 3 steps behind me" but more so as "walk along with me". Of course he tends to walk fast sometimes.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #410  
Old 04-14-2011, 04:07 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I simply cannot picture William with the attitude of "you walk 3 steps behind me" but more so as "walk along with me". Of course he tends to walk fast sometimes.
Catherine will be fast in learning the soft spoken but unmistakable Hiss: "William, will you please WAIT!" that many a wife masters as her first words in their personal "language of love"... LOL...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #411  
Old 04-14-2011, 04:50 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn View Post
Charles and DoE are appointed members of the queen's Privy Council, thus have official roles within the monarchy.

There are over 500 Privy Counsellors and the Queen can appoint anyone to that position. Most appointees are politicians as the work they do is part of the parliamentary process. Most privy councillors never actually attend a meeting (my distant relative who was a member for over 30 years never attended a meeting. His grandfather also never attended despite being a privy cousellor for about 30 years as well).

Philip was actually appointed by George VI.

Usually about 4 - 10 councillors attend meetings with the Queen and rarely do Charles or Philip attend as the council is really just a rubber stamp of government business. The Queen and everybody else stand, the business is read and the Queen says 'approved'. That is it, unless she wishes to announce something else e.g. that she has given permission to a wedding.

Privy Council of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #412  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:20 PM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
Yes, but Prince Charles does have duties and a role because he acts as a counsilior of state and regent when the Queen is away.

But...back to the topic. Looking at some of the charities involved in their wedding fund, I think most of Kate's patronages and charity associations will be with sports and arts and education. She will undoubtably get involved with some of William's patronages and activities.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #413  
Old 04-14-2011, 10:28 PM
Anna Catherine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: U.C., United States
Posts: 321
soooo.....who was the last wife of the heir to the heir to the throne? Mary of Teck right? What did she do after her wedding...as in what "duties and roles"? It may give us an idea what Kate's role? Though that was a different time and era.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #414  
Old 04-15-2011, 10:28 AM
Sister Morphine's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Carolina, United States
Posts: 2,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anna Catherine View Post
soooo.....who was the last wife of the heir to the heir to the throne? Mary of Teck right? What did she do after her wedding...as in what "duties and roles"? It may give us an idea what Kate's role? Though that was a different time and era.

You just answered your own question. When the Duke of York (George V) got married, it was 1893. Wealthy women (as Mary now was) weren't expected to do anything back then, not even raise their kids -- that was fobbed off on nannies and governesses.
__________________
"The grass was greener / The light was brighter / The taste was sweeter / The nights of wonder / With friends surrounded / The dawn mist glowing / The water flowing / The endless river / Forever and ever........ "
Reply With Quote
  #415  
Old 04-28-2011, 02:41 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,500
But we can't really make comparisons between then and now.

Women's roles have changed so dramatically that each new generation has to make it up as they go along.

There is no blueprint anymore, and W&K will have to work it out for themselves. It's not as if there are no opportunities for the two of them...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #416  
Old 04-28-2011, 02:50 PM
Duke of Marmalade's Avatar
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 8,870
If Kate and Wills chose to be Mr. & Mrs. Wales in their hideaway playing normal husband and housewife the momentum of public excitement will very soon turn against them.

Kate has had the stigma of waiting and not working for years, now its her chance to do something useful with her title. If she misses that chance and both become a reluctant couple wanting to be left alone with their normal life they wont be popular for long and the parasite discussion will be fully back on, this time with Kate as a member of the BRF.

Its vital that Kate now starts creating her own field of interest re charities etc.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #417  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:20 PM
Sonjapearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In front of my Mac, United States
Posts: 606
According to the Daily Mail (reliable, I know :P ), the Duchess is going to be a housewife for quite a while.

Quote:
The new Duchess of Cambridge will not become a full-time working royal for up to two years – because she wants to concentrate on being a housewife.
Despite a surge of public interest in the Royal Family following Friday’s wedding, Kate is refusing to conduct any public engagements without her husband for the foreseeable future.
There are only two or three joint events pencilled in over the next couple of months and aides admit the new bride intends to spend most of her time with her husband on Anglesey.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #418  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:25 PM
CrownPrincess5's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,545
If she gets the chance to be a housewife then that's great. But I don't see why she needs Will for every engagement. Daniel was able to branch out on his own and I think Kate should eventually to do the same.

I wonder what those "that pursuits" are.
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living.
-Steven Spielberg
Reply With Quote
  #419  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:11 PM
BritishRoyals's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: --, United States
Posts: 112
Great for them! Just like the Queen when she first got married. Shows that William & and Palace are actually supporting this marriage more than anything.

Being primarily a housewife doesn't mean not doing public duties... it just means she won't be a full time member of the RF like Prince Charles or Princess Anne just yet. Remember that there's Canada in July... that in itself it a HUGE commitment -- the first time something like this to happen so soon to a new royal wife.
__________________
*** Baby Cambridge Fundraiser === http://www.justgiving.com/BabyCambridgeFundraiser ***
Reply With Quote
  #420  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:12 PM
Duchess of Durham's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Durham, United States
Posts: 619
Quote:
Kate is said to have the support of the Queen who, as a newly-wed, lived in Malta for two years when Prince Philip was based there with the Navy. The monarch considers it one of her happiest periods.
If HM is okay with it, then who am I to say it isn't okay.

I don't blame her for wanting to be a newlywed. Perhaps that was one of the (many) reasons why the Duke's parents marriage was not a good one early on. They didn't seem to get the chance to be newlywed's before they were paraded around.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
charities, charity, duchess of cambridge, duties, kate, kate middleton, roles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Duties and Roles of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie HighGoalHighDreams The Duke of York, Sarah Duchess of York, and Family 1606 06-24-2014 12:59 PM




Popular Tags
belgium carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jewellery jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince daniel prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]