The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #861  
Old 10-26-2013, 12:47 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: US, United States
Posts: 288
It's felt a whole lot of fun watching the many giving contributes from the members that gather here where we can talk about the serenity of the godsends called Royals. Many find the atypical reality of idols, their related and differentiated likeness to our own way of achieving super or the normal in our way of life, to be akin to an appreciated attribute if done to upheave, exalt us or enthrall us unto renewal of breathing in better or healthier extravagance in the environment we are given eyes for. I am glad and a bit tired following the forum but aware that we are gradually returning again and again to find that we are participating in the historical and memorable. So with that I say that it's an honor and a compliment to heritage and heredity that we can arrive at this destiny and find the homely and fantastic in the Royals' and in our selves. Continue being happy posters and admirers of a exemplary legacy. I enjoy reading and following. Cheers.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #862  
Old 10-26-2013, 06:39 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 858
Why do William's trousers look too short on the leg? Even when he stands up they are still too short on the leg. His trousers are for a shorter man.

Michael MIDDLETON's trousers - perfect!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #863  
Old 10-26-2013, 07:00 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 3,121
Cute or just creepy? Pippa's unusual Ģ7,000 christening gift to baby George - his hands and feet in silver by bespoke sculptors





Lots of criticisms of Pippa's gift, but I think it's a cute idea.
Reply With Quote
  #864  
Old 10-26-2013, 07:25 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 15,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archduchess Zelia View Post
Two more pictures? Bless them. I'm hope they're just as good as the ones already released. I'm still not over George's wonderful little hands up pose just yet He's really adorable.

As for the generation picture, while it would have been nice if HM had been the one holding George, I totally think that the picture of the BRF makes up for that. The way HM looks at George is just wonderful, such an adoring look - the look of a great-grandmother rather than that of a Queen - I love it.
Isn't that a wonderful photo,one of my favourites so far!
__________________
20th of December 1963,Birth of The Infanta Elena, Duchess of Lugo
Reply With Quote
  #865  
Old 10-26-2013, 07:27 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,081
Queen Victoria had the limbs of some of her infant children sculpted in white marble, so this isn't a new or novel thing within the British Royal family.
Reply With Quote
  #866  
Old 10-26-2013, 09:03 AM
Lee-Z's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands
Posts: 2,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
Yep, cute i have drawings of my baby-hands/feet and i always loved that i have these
sculptings are even cuter (but my dad couldn't sculpt, just draw )
Reply With Quote
  #867  
Old 10-26-2013, 09:28 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
Gentlemen did not hold babies in 1894. IMO the only reason Victoria held the baby was because she was a woman. Complaining that the picture is not a replica of the original is ridiculous. We got the picture, and it is lovely.

This is a generalization. Of course men were holding babies at the time, not as frequent or naturally as women did. But there are vintage photographs, even from the old king of Denmark (I think it was king christian IX) holding his great-grandson for the official christening-four-generations-photograph or King Oskar II of Sweden holding the future crown prince, of men when a baby or a toddler was sitting on the lap!

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/23...f8586da1ea.jpg

I even watched a father pushing a pram on Brighton pier on a documentary from about 1900 while his wife walked beside him and no passers by looked irritarted or something - the whole scene was very natural.
In all periods there were men and women who coped easily with little children while others were not. But of course zeitgeist and social norms did their bit.
Reply With Quote
  #868  
Old 10-26-2013, 09:54 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by BritishRoyalist View Post
I don't have any restatement towards any Queen or anybody. I was replying to a comment that Ish made which you probably didn't read. I was saying At least the two pictures I found of Queen Margarethe was holding a Grandchildrens. Maybe you need to read again.

By the way I am talking Grandchildren's not Children's which proves you didn't read the whole post i replied too and comments before that. Better read again.

By the way when I say holding I mean holding not just the child setting on their lap or next to them.

Itīs you who didnīt seem to have read properly. I never said you had anything against certain Queens. But certainly you did refer to two particular Queens (Victoria and Margrethe), and I just doubted the possible reason you named why Queens regnant might have predictions against being photographed with a baby.
By the way I didnīt write "restatement" but "resentment". Pleas read again!
Reply With Quote
  #869  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:16 PM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 5,713
Has anyone already seen the new photo of George? I can't find it
Reply With Quote
  #870  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:26 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty91charmed View Post
Has anyone already seen the new photo of George? I can't find it
hasn't been issued yet.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #871  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:32 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: ...., Netherlands
Posts: 222
I think the two new photographs will be released tomorrow?
In the Sunday Newspapers?
Reply With Quote
  #872  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:33 PM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 5,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
hasn't been issued yet.
Are you sure? A journalist in twitter says it has been released but maybe there's still the embargo
Reply With Quote
  #873  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:44 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,411
This is from CNN

Max Foster ‏@MaxFosterCNN 24 Oct
Want to see the FULL set if of official Prince George christening photographs? They'll appear here 10pBST/11pCET/5pET CNN.com - Breaking News, U.S., World, Weather, Entertainment & Video News

What journalist do you mean?
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #874  
Old 10-26-2013, 02:03 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: ...., Netherlands
Posts: 222
So the FULL set will be 6 photos?
Reply With Quote
  #875  
Old 10-26-2013, 02:24 PM
BritishRoyalist's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by wartenberg7 View Post
Itīs you who didnīt seem to have read properly. I never said you had anything against certain Queens. But certainly you did refer to two particular Queens (Victoria and Margrethe), and I just doubted the possible reason you named why Queens regnant might have predictions against being photographed with a baby. By the way I didnīt write "restatement" but "resentment". Pleas read again!
I know what you meant. I don't have to read again and I use my iPhone half the time so I never caught the misspelled word. By the way look up resentment. It means negative emotions which I don't have any magazine emotions (resentment) against any thing

And again go back a few pages and start reading post which obviously you never did and I never made any predictions against any Queen or why any had any prediction so I am not sure what you are talking about. I replying to a comment ISH made about the queen not holding babies but for some reason you decided to only read what I was saying and took it out of context without reading previous post first!

You should read what you wrote again in last post as that does not make sense.
__________________
Long Live the Queen!! The Real Queen of Hearts!
Reply With Quote
  #876  
Old 10-26-2013, 02:36 PM
BritishRoyalist's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmmaNL View Post
I think the two new photographs will be released tomorrow? In the Sunday Newspapers?
Yes there are Two more photos appearing in tomorrow newspapers:

@richardaeden: 'The Sunday Telegraph' @Telegraph is to publish a beautiful new portrait of #PrinceGeorge by @jasonbellphoto tomorrow

@theroyaleditor: 2 more official Prince George photographs set to be released for UK Sunday newspapers. Perhaps The Queen will be holding the baby in them?

They will appear online tonight.
__________________
Long Live the Queen!! The Real Queen of Hearts!
Reply With Quote
  #877  
Old 10-26-2013, 03:40 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by BritishRoyalist View Post
I know what you meant. I don't have to read again and I use my iPhone half the time so I never caught the misspelled word. By the way look up resentment. It means negative emotions which I don't have any magazine emotions (resentment) against any thing

And again go back a few pages and start reading post which obviously you never did and I never made any predictions against any Queen or why any had any prediction so I am not sure what you are talking about. I replying to a comment ISH made about the queen not holding babies but for some reason you decided to only read what I was saying and took it out of context without reading previous post first!

You should read what you wrote again in last post as that does not make sense.

resentment remains resentment, its meaning is undoubted.
I explain things and you proof in your answers that you donīt get me.
But it seems hopeless, I give up as I donīt think we will ever come together...
Reply With Quote
  #878  
Old 10-26-2013, 03:53 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 775
If one of these pictures has The Queen holding George everyone complained about her not holding him are going to have pie on their faces.
Reply With Quote
  #879  
Old 10-26-2013, 04:49 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,367
We all know what picture they are going to release. It is George with the star of the photo shoot, the Queen's handbag :)
Reply With Quote
  #880  
Old 10-26-2013, 05:17 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
We all know what picture they are going to release. It is George with the star of the photo shoot, the Queen's handbag :)
How about George going through the Queen's handbag? :)
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
christening, prince george of cambridge


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
ascot 2016 bavaria best gown best gown 2016 best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit catherine middleton style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge dutch state visit e-mail fashion poll grand duke jean greece kate middleton king abdullah ii king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand nobel gala norway norwegian royals november 2016 october 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week prince bernhard prince charles princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess victorias daytime fashion queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen mathildes outfits queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania in belgium royal fashion royal weddings september 2016 state visit state visit to denmark succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises