EIIR
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,656
- City
- Somewhere
- Country
- United Kingdom
St. James's Palace have apparently confirmed that the photos are genuine.
This is just a disgrace. If these people can't expect privacy while on a private estate (which is apparently extremely secluded and private) belonging to one of their family members, where can they expect privacy?
I also thought that France was supposedly passionate about the privacy of individuals, even those who are in the public eye? Evidently this is not the case when it comes to British royals.
Nicholas Witchell is on the BBC right now reporting from Kuala Lumpur and says that he's never seen royal officials so angry as they are right now. William, in particular, is apparently outraged, which is probably not surprising given his disdain for the press even before this.
In the picture I saw on Closer she seems to be in a yacht, no invation of privacy at all if that´s the case. What I found annoying from the beginning, as I said in another thread, is that they took another vacation. I think that the excuse for not attending the paralympics was that he was supposed to be "working" on the base, wasn´t it? And they were in France.
OK, notedThey weren't in a hotel, they were in the private house of William's second cousin, Viscount Linley. Apparently numerous members of the royal family have holidayed there without the press even knowing they were there.
Kate is the future Queen of England, and she has to be much more carefull than any average person. And of course she CAN'T take her top off nowere, outside of protecting walls! This is obvious, no? There is NO LAW protecting her, because it sells for millions.If Kate can't take her top off while on private property in a remote estate in a country with notoriously strict privacy laws, she can't take her top off anywhere. .
Ha Ha nice joke!!Kate will obviously have to start wearing a bikini or swimming costume in the bath or shower, given that a member of staff or the postman or some pap with a long lense might snap a picture of her and it's apparently fair game.
Sophie was taken in pic BEFORE being Erwards's wifeWas Sophie stupid for being photographed years before she met Prince Edward while goofing around on holiday when they published her topless photo?
Was Diana stupid for working out in a gym when they drilled holes in the wall and published crotch shots?
Was prosecutor Marcia Clark stupid for vacationing in Europe and being topless on a beach and seeing her 10 yr. old topless photos published in the middle of the OJ Simpson murder trial?
Sophie was taken in pic BEFORE being Erwards's wife
Diana was not taken topless
Marcia Clark is not the future Queen of England.
What I'm trying to say, is that being topless is not something bad to do. But since for a future Queen is a not acceptable behavior, SHE HAS TO DO HER UTMOST IN ORDER NEVER BE CAUGHT IN TOPLESS. So simple.
Ha Ha nice joke!!
More seriousely, when takes a shower she has to close the bath'room's door!!
I just think that besides beeing at her home she could't have been in topless in any other place...even if she was 100% that they aren't any paparazzi, she should know tha outside home that is forbiden...so things happen...and I'am not blaming her but...
I can understand the privacy issues and the photographer and publisher has gone way out of line. But even on a private estate why would you go around topless when you know paps will be anywhere they can be to get pictures. Look at the honeymoon pictures we got?
If it was to get an even tan, she shouldn't. I'm not saying she's in the wrong I just don't understand why anyone would go topless.
fandesacs2003 said:Sophie was taken in pic BEFORE being Erwards's wife
Diana was not taken topless
Marcia Clark is not the future Queen of England.
What I'm trying to say, is that being topless is not something bad to do. But since for a future Queen is a not acceptable behavior, SHE HAS TO DO HER UTMOST IN ORDER NEVER BE CAUGHT IN TOPLESS. So simple.