The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1341  
Old 06-13-2018, 02:56 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 5,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
That's absurd. Kate took off her top on a private property, miles from the road, to sunbathe or cange her swim suit...
I don't think that was Madame Maseau's view, but rather what the lawyers are trying to paint in order to say the damages were excessive. Their point is no longer that they violated her privacy. However, now it's if the damage to her justified. If we really get down to it, bringing Meghan's modelling shots into this in the first place is absurd. She has never posed topless in any of those photos. Fashion shoots are often provocative, but not going over that line for the most part. So it still doesn't jive with their argument that the damage should be less.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1342  
Old 06-13-2018, 04:26 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn View Post
What was to be expected of Harry? Just think of the chosen careers of former girlfriends: modeling like Florence Brudenell-bruce, who modelled lingerie to Cressida Bonas, who is an actress (or wants to become one). His cousin Lady Amelia Windsor works as a mannequin - it is done nowadays even by Royals and Royal men like HH Prince Nicolaj of Denmark.



So what? Times have changed and maybe the Royal family would have been happier with Koo Stark than Sarah Ferguson as Duchess of York. Who knows? As long as Meghan behaves as Harry's wife, she could have done a lot more than she actually did in her past.
To be fair to Cressida and Amelia, being an actress or a model doesn't make someone trashy per se.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1343  
Old 06-13-2018, 04:52 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 169
A few years ago I went topless at a lake , it wasn't private property or anything like that and I wasn't the only one . It was also not a nude beach area , just a local lake that had not been invaded by tourists . I'd be pissed if somebody had taken a picture and put it online somewhere, I didn't consent to that . The implied consent to see my like that was only for the people around me in various stages of undressed and swimwear themselves . Just because somebody is naked doesn't mean it's a free for all picture buffet.
Reply With Quote
  #1344  
Old 06-21-2018, 01:23 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 5,264
An apology and retraction from the Mirror to The Duchess of Sussex on this matter.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/corrections...ology-12757386

Meghan Markle's lawyers have informed us, and we accept, that no provocative images of Meghan Markle were used in the proceedings. We apologise for our error.
Reply With Quote
  #1345  
Old 06-21-2018, 03:49 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
Bet that wasnt on the front page as glaringly as the false story was!!!!! And all of those sites who quoted the Mirror's false story aren't going to publish the apology either!
Reply With Quote
  #1346  
Old 09-19-2018, 12:11 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,187
"There was an absolutely unacceptable breach, not only of the privacy and the private lives of these two individuals, but also of the dignity of a woman,"

- French prosecutor Marc Brisset-Foucault.

French Closer magazine loses appeal over topless photos of Duchess of Cambridge
Reply With Quote
  #1347  
Old 09-19-2018, 06:36 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 4,026
Thanks for sharing the update on the appeal. I had a feeling that they were going to lose.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
aif birthday celebration bracelets british royal family clothes crown prince hussein's future wife current events cypher dailyfail de belgique denmark discussão duchessofsussex duchess of sussex duke of edinburgh duke of sussex earl of wessex fashion french revolution future wife of prince hussein genealogy general news gordon hamdan bin mohammed harry and meghan headship her children interesting facts iñaki urdangarín jack brooksbank juan carlos lady louise mountbatten-windsor letter lineage meghan markle member mohammed vi nelson mandela bay patron prince aymeric prince harry prince harry of wales princenapoleon prince nicholas prince peter princess princess beatrice princess benedikte princesses princess louise princess of belgium princess royal prince william public image queen elisabeth relationship remarriage royal royal family rumania sarah ferguson state visit tiara tradition wedding windsor windsor castle windy city wivies ww1



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises