 |
|
10-10-2012, 04:52 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 7,242
|
|
|
Its about cash, nothing else. Kate sells, and frankly, why would people have respect, at least outside the UK, where magazines dont live in fear of being cut off by the royal house on future lucrative events (the money reason again)? Who is Kate, the wife of, nothing more. She is seen by most people as celebrity. Those who take royalty seriously, let alone Kate whose achievements are non-existent at this stage, are very small-numbered on a world wide scale anyway.
|
10-27-2012, 07:44 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,190
|
|
|
The Closer
__________________
|
11-21-2012, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: venice regio, Italy
Posts: 28
|
|
|
Ok this is old 'stuff', but I say, If you are a burglar and you do not want to be caught... then, do not steal.
It doesn't matter if you are a royal or not, but, if you do not want to be seen topless... then do not go for it
Instead, if you do, royal or not, also in a private location, and you get caught... well take your responsabilities...
There are 2 distinctions in 'papparazzi',
First: those ones who are telling/writing whateverwhat=lies. And they do it for money
Second: the ones, usually the ones who takes pictures, even indescretes ones, and they do it for money too... but pictures do not tell lies
So who is going to blame the guy who took the pictures and why?
And what kind of job are you doing?
__________________
Car la vie est un bien perdue quand on n'a pas vécu comme on l'aurait voulu Eminescu
|
11-22-2012, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Deep South, United States
Posts: 214
|
|
|
According to the French Court, the guy who took the pictures broke the law. So he is certainly to blame.
|
11-24-2012, 08:50 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,190
|
|
|
__________________
|
12-09-2012, 11:48 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: n/a, United States
Posts: 107
|
|
|
Not sure how invading someone's privacy and posting topless pics is part of the job.
|
12-09-2012, 11:55 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,057
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelly
Not sure how invading someone's privacy and posting topless pics is part of the job.
|
It must have been in the Job Description  .
|
12-09-2012, 04:02 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 61
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teia
Ok this is old 'stuff', but I say, If you are a burglar and you do not want to be caught... then, do not steal.
It doesn't matter if you are a royal or not, but, if you do not want to be seen topless... then do not go for it
Instead, if you do, royal or not, also in a private location, and you get caught... well take your responsabilities...
|
I must disagree. She was not in a public place at all. With current technology, photos could be taken of you in your hotel bathroom. Are you saying if you don't shower with your clothes on, it's your fault if naked photos of you are taken and published?
|
02-12-2013, 05:52 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 282
|
|
|
|
02-12-2013, 06:13 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 297
|
|
Well she has bulge and that's it. 
|
02-12-2013, 06:39 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by McKeen
I must disagree. She was not in a public place at all. With current technology, photos could be taken of you in your hotel bathroom. Are you saying if you don't shower with your clothes on, it's your fault if naked photos of you are taken and published?
|
I wholeheartedly agree. This invasion of privacy has the potential to affect all of us not just royalty, political figures, celebrities etc...
|
02-12-2013, 07:10 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Detroit, United States
Posts: 209
|
|
|
That's a baby bump? I'm bigger than that and I wear size 5,6, or 7 pants.
__________________
How can I dislike the Vasas for running my country when their babies are so cute!
|
02-12-2013, 08:30 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 282
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble Consort Ming
That's a baby bump? I'm bigger than that and I wear size 5,6, or 7 pants.
|
Yeah, but you have to compare it to her last photoshoot in a bikini...or out of it as the case is
|
04-24-2013, 01:17 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,619
|
|
Royal Central @RoyalCentral 3m
BREAKING NEWS: Two people have been charged over topless photos of the Duchess of Cambridge, Sky News reports.
Kate Middleton Topless Pictures: 'Two Charged'
Gordon Rayner @gordonrayner 10m
Photographer and publisher of Closer magazine France are the two who have been charged. St James's Palace had asked for criminal probe
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|
04-24-2013, 01:20 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,570
|
|
Gordon Rayner @gordonrayner 5m
Photographer and publisher of Closer magazine France are the two who have been charged. St James's Palace had asked for criminal probe
__________________
“The only guide to man is his conscience; the only shield to his memory is the rectitude and sincerity of his actions. It is very imprudent to walk through life without this shield, because we are so often mocked by the failure of our hopes and the upsetting of our calculations; but with this shield, however the fates may play, we march always in the ranks of honor.”
Sir Winston Churchill
|
04-24-2013, 01:30 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Jutland, Denmark
Posts: 3,553
|
|
 Good. Throw the book at them.
__________________
I don't have a beer gut. I have protective covering for my rock hard abs.
|
04-24-2013, 01:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,619
|
|
|
Paul Harrison @SkyNewsRoyal 44s
#royal reports say two were charged "this month" - photos taken while couple on holiday at french Chateau d'Autet, owned by #Queen's nephew
Peter Allen @peterallenparis 3m
Royal update: Valerie Suau charged ‘in connection’ with topless Duchess of Cambridge pics, but claims she only took decent ones.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|
04-24-2013, 02:38 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 2,595
|
|
|
I'm not convinced that the "Chi" photos are actually William and Kate. Something is not quite right, to my eye.
|
04-24-2013, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Giraffe Land, United States
Posts: 786
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta
I'm not convinced that the "Chi" photos are actually William and Kate. Something is not quite right, to my eye.
|
Interesting.... could you elaborate, please?
Why did it take so long to charge these two? Did they not know who the two were.
__________________
God Save The Bump!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|
Chevy Camaro Forum
Ford Mustang Forum
Jeep Wrangler Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum
Land Rover Defender Forum
