The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #741  
Old 04-02-2013, 04:45 PM
Baroness of Books's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 5,772
LOL, she hasn't even delivered the first baby yet and we're already starting on the second!
__________________

__________________
A book should be either a bandit or a rebel or a man in the crowd..... D.H. Lawrence
  #742  
Old 04-02-2013, 07:28 PM
kathia_sophia's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 1,702
Usually when royals have children, they don't take big gaps between their births, normally around 1.5~3 years is the gap between siblings. Should they wait more or not is up to them, but I would want to believe that they will give Cambridge Baby a sibling after 2 years at least. I love big families and children, and it shows that William and Catherine do as well, unless she has some problems when giving birth, I'm sure she will want more children of her own.

I know the baby isn't even born yet, but when I try to imagine what will be like in 2 or 3 years from now, I imagine adorable Cambridge Baby (then a toddler) with cute Baby II with lots of love and hugs!!! (I remenber when Leonor kissed her sister, so cute! Or when Elisabeth and Gabriel kissed Eleonore, it melts my heart!!!)
__________________

__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
  #743  
Old 04-02-2013, 08:58 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
Kathie Sophia, I hate to remind that Kate has already had a problem with birth, that is, having HG. I hadn't thought it was necessarily something that happens with every birth in a family, but the threads here have given information that it is often, if not usually, continued in each pregnancy of a woman who has it in her first. The Duchess may not want to do this again soon. I have not heard of any way to prevent it, have you, or has any one? I suppose it's slightly easier to handle if one is royal and has a lot of help from nannies, cooks, and nurses. I would say that at the very least IV feeding of the mother should be anticipated. We don't know if Katherine will have any problems at delivery, as I don't think those are associated with HG.
__________________
  #744  
Old 04-02-2013, 09:10 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro and Petrópolis, Brazil
Posts: 1,124
Well, there's all that "heir and spare" thing.

I believe a lot of people will expect her to have at least another child.
__________________
  #745  
Old 04-02-2013, 09:33 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
She'll probably do it, Brazilian, but there are other heirs with baby potential, Harry, Beatrice, Eugenie. Lady Louise won't be having babies soon, but of course it will be a long time (we think) until the current generation will produce a monarch. James Wessex even. So no rush?
__________________
  #746  
Old 04-02-2013, 09:37 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro and Petrópolis, Brazil
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
She'll probably do it, Brazilian, but there are other heirs with baby potential, Harry, Beatrice, Eugenie. Lady Louise won't be having babies soon, but of course it will be a long time (we think) until the current generation will produce a monarch. James Wessex even. So no rush?
Of course, but people expect the "heir and spare" from the direct heir to the Throne and his/her consort. In this case, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
__________________
  #747  
Old 04-03-2013, 03:56 AM
kathia_sophia's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 1,702
BrazilianEmpire I see your point there, I always heard about "Heir and Spare", because its a way to secure the "direct" line of sucession. I remenber Letizia had problems with her first pregnancy, even delivering with C-section,despite all the problems she had, she got pregnant again to produce a spare (of course it wasn't only the main reason) and got a worse pregnancy than her first, after the "heir and spare" births, she never got pregnant again because she didn't want to.
So I believe that even if Catherine had her HG and is eventually to have on her second pregnancy, she will probably endure it to produce a spare (of course with other reasons as well).
__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
  #748  
Old 04-03-2013, 04:50 AM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,846
I do think William & Catherine will be blessed with another baby but I think they are more concentrated on the one that will arrive in a few months time.

I just think its beautiful to watch these two now starting a family. I'm sure a lot of people will get emotional on the day of the birth.
__________________
  #749  
Old 04-03-2013, 08:39 AM
LadyCatharine's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Ohio, United States
Posts: 368
Kate did comment she did not want to wait until she's 40 to have children
Her mum did mention when you are in the baby making mode you will understand ,Kate will have alot of help unlike us,she will have nannies and her mum.
__________________
  #750  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:55 AM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,846
Will Kate give birth in an NHS hospital?
Will Kate give birth in an NHS hospital? | Richard Palmer | Columnists | Comment | Daily Express
__________________
  #751  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:51 AM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,846
Victoria Murphy ‏@QueenVicMirror 4m
OK so lots of royal baby news today! Kate revealed her baby is due in mid-July and she will be stopping royal duties sometime in June

Victoria Murphy ‏@QueenVicMirror 4m
She also said she and William have a shortlist of names but it's really difficult and her friends keep texting her names
__________________
  #752  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:56 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro and Petrópolis, Brazil
Posts: 1,124
The best thing the Duchess of Cambridge can do is research in list of English and British Kings and Queen since William the Conqueror, and choose a name that pleases both she and her husband, and Her Majesty the Queen, of course.
__________________
  #753  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:06 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
With HG, it's not just a matter of "enduring". It can be actually life-threatening. and it can happen even to a healthy looking woman like Kate, to be more than inconvenienced with HG. I think Kate will probably nurse the baby, so this may hold off another pregnancy for a while. When I had HG, I threw up EVERYTHING including medications.
I should have had frequent IV's, that's why I suggest Kate and her docs should plan on IV intervention even before she gets sick. They simply don't know the mechanism of HG (not that I've read) but I think it may happen more to slender women who diet a lot.
That is just a guess. This whole thing, and also watching Downton Abbey, where one of the characters had toxemia and died of it, made me realize that dangers of pregnancy still abound. My mom had toxemia when she carried me, and we both barely survived, and she never had another baby. And my mom was not a "sick" invalid type, hardly ever went to doctors. She was a slender, athletic woman, not a hypochondriac. Anyway, I'm ranting, but I can see good reason to hope that others have the "spare", whatever may be expected of the direct heirs to the throne.
__________________
  #754  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:28 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 3,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariel View Post
With HG, it's not just a matter of "enduring". It can be actually life-threatening. and it can happen even to a healthy looking woman like Kate, to be more than inconvenienced with HG. I think Kate will probably nurse the baby, so this may hold off another pregnancy for a while.
There is still the fact that once the baby is born and in your arms, you totally forget all the nasty stuff you endured during your pregnancy. Although I can attest to the fact that this statement is true, one never does forget totally.

I do think Kate will have more than one child and I do think they will be born close together in age. The first pregnancy is always the hardest and with the second, things aren't quite as scary and lessons are learned from the first pregnancy.
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
  #755  
Old 04-05-2013, 03:46 AM
LadyGabrielle's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: kapaa, United States
Posts: 1,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrazilianEmpire View Post
The best thing the Duchess of Cambridge can do is research in list of English and British Kings and Queen since William the Conqueror, and choose a name that pleases both she and her husband, and Her Majesty the Queen, of course.
Why does it have to pease the Queen? I did not know that she has a say in the name of the baby. Is that a normal thing?
__________________
  #756  
Old 04-05-2013, 04:11 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyGabrielle View Post

Why does it have to pease the Queen? I did not know that she has a say in the name of the baby. Is that a normal thing?
Apparently she has a veto power, which I think is nonsense.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
  #757  
Old 04-05-2013, 04:30 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,212
Nonsense that she has veto power, or nonsense that we believe she has it?
__________________
  #758  
Old 04-05-2013, 01:37 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 919
Queen Fifi Trixiebelle? King Brooklyn? The Monarch has veto power for a reason. Although it seems unlikely that she will need to exercise it, at least not in this case.
__________________
  #759  
Old 04-05-2013, 01:52 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Alamos, United States
Posts: 1,034
When Beatrice and Eugenie were born, I read that the parents wanted to call one of them Sophia. But the queen vetoed it. I also read that the Queen consulted with foreign royals about the name. Maybe that much consultation will not be in effect this time. I do not know why the queen object to "Sophia". I do not think Sophie Wessex was in the picture at that time.
__________________
  #760  
Old 04-05-2013, 02:08 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Nonsense that she has veto power, or nonsense that we believe she has it?
Nonsense that she has it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
Queen Fifi Trixiebelle? King Brooklyn? The Monarch has veto power for a reason.
Yes because clearly past royal children have shown a lot of parents choosing fifi trixiebelle and Brooklyn yes? Royals have enough common sense to know who their own children are, naming them something stupid isn't going to happen. Veto power or not.
__________________

__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Closed Thread

Tags
baby gifts, prince william and duchess of cambridge


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zara Phillips and Mike Tindall Wedding Suggestions and Musings Thread Zonk The Princess Royal and Family 480 07-30-2011 08:59 AM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth charlene crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit duchess of cambridge dutch royal history engagement fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jewellery jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king constantine ii king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympic games olympics ottoman poland pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess astrid princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess letizia princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess of asturias queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit the hague visit wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]