The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #221  
Old 04-29-2011, 05:28 PM
Skippy's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mia_mae View Post
no you are not, I also was very impressed with the dress. The problem is with others.
I second that. Am I out of touch now as well?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 04-29-2011, 05:47 PM
georgiea's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 1,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessKaimi View Post
Major designers, interviewed about the dress, are saying it was inspired by both Queen Elizabeth's and Prince Grace's dress, as well as being modern and updated from both. There's an article somewhere that lists like 6 major designers, including Lagerfeld, all saying just about the same thing - and they all liked the dress very much.

Returning to the mid-century notions of dress is not a bad idea at all.

As for Princess Grace being an AMERICAN, she was also a COMMONER, and therefore, there's a connection between Catherine and Grace, both of whom married well above the station of their birth.

It would be really odd if British designers never incorporated looks from outside their own national boundaries (silk is after all, originally Chinese) - and isn't Cartier French? The fact that British designers can look about the world and make a design that works for a home grown British lass is a good advertisement for British design. But total originality? That's not what was wanted or needed here.

The fact that Princess Grace's dress is, in my view, the most iconic of all wedding dresses, was not lost on Sarah Burton or Kate.
Agree with you PrincessKaimi. Here is a article and photos on the two brides. I really think Catherine told Sarah Burton what see wanted and the designer designed it. I love everything-dress, lace, veil and train. I think the lace's forms symbolized love and England just like the beautiful wedding cake frosting forms. Catherine again had input.

BTW I see a little in the dresses of parts from Queen Elizabeth and Princesses Grace, Margaret and Anne. I am one of the few who didn't like Pippa's dress. What I mean is Pippa's just didn't go with the rest of the bridal party. I loved all of the other attendants clothes.

Kate Middleton's wedding dress similar to gown worn by Grace Kelly; Actress married Prince in 1956
__________________

__________________
Watch your actions, for they become your habits. Watch your habits because they become your character. Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 04-29-2011, 05:49 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: everywhere, United States
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnEliza View Post
??? I was born into a well off family in America too, but that doesn't make me anything more than a commoner. We don't have aristocracy in America, even if you are born wealthy and into a well-established family.

As for being a movie star -- even less "aristocratic"!
While we don't have aristocracy in America, there is no denying that society views someone from your background to be more established than say mine as I was not born into a well-off family. It may not be a traditional aristocracy but there is a divide between rich, middle class and poor. That's why people made mean comments about her family because they have new money but I digress. But technically yes she is a commoner. This was a response to a comment written about my post that said Kate and Grace Kelly are on the same level. My point was that Kate was not born into money as Grace Kelly was so she and Kate are not on the same level. So I see no reason why channeling her makes any sense. That was my distinction...

So I guess the question is whether or not the dress should have been original or should it have been more of a copy? There are of course some differing opinions and I've made mine clear. I also agree with the posters that say that Kate had her fair share of input and in my opinion blame for the design of the dress.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 04-29-2011, 05:54 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Serene Highness - Picture of the Month Representative - Britain
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach (CA), United States
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta View Post
With wedding gowns, there are only so many variations on a classic style. Just because it had lace does not make it a copy of the late HSH's gowns. I have to say I was more than impressed with the design.

I thought her make up looked great; I guess I'm just out of touch with everything...so I'll just go merrily along my way.
I'll be out of touch along with you, cause I definitely agree with your post.

I thought Kate looked wonderful. The design of the dress fit her style perfectly - simple but elegant. I love the detailing on the bottom of the dress.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roxsteve View Post
Catherine looked tired, but she seemed happier than William. When she was walking down the aisle, William looked maybe once and turned around. I did not see him excited or wowed by his bride. He seemed tired. Harry looked happier and more animated about the bride. Even when her father is lifting the veil, William is reading or singing...He did not seem excited.
He seemed happy to me. I noticed he kept sneaking glances at her throughout the ceremony and when she got to the altar, he told her she looked beautiful. I think they were both just really overwhelmed and nervous during the service. At one point you could see Catherine's hands shaking. They seemed to really loosen up when they got in the carriage.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:03 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: port st lucie, United States
Posts: 157
I see the nod to GK I also see Queen Elizabeth's dress. But to me, it is definitely not a copy of Grace Kelly's dress. It is different enough. My only wish would be to add some pearls or sequins and maybe a different shade of lace from the dress so it stood out more. Also, another 3 to 6ft of train.
I didn't notice anything wrong with her make up, and I watched on a huge high def TV. I would think she wouldn't want to look washed out under the camera's. Going more natural would not have appealed to me on such a grand occasion or with 2 billion people watching!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:09 PM
jdcharlie's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: :), United States
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5 View Post
The evening dress is nice but as I look at it more I agree that it should have some color or something.

Both dresses are not in McQueen style IMO.

The corsetry and flared/structured hip are classic McQueen.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:33 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 516
I really love this wedding dress. It was exactly the kind of style I was hoping to see - very elegant and understated with all the details finished to the highest degree, (the description of the work that went into the lace alone almost made me swoon. :) ). First of all, it fit, which should be a no brainer but, looking back at pictures of more than a few previous royal brides it seems that ensuring the dress actually fits the bride isn't as obvious a starting point as I would have thought. I loved the overall design, from the lace work to the way the whole thing did such a good job at setting off Kate's figure and silhouette. I think the dress is a beautiful piece of craftsmanship at the highest level, in addition to just looking good on the bride.

I have to eat crow on all of this as when I first heard that Sarah Burton might be designing the dress I was kind of worried based on some of her previous work which is beautiful but completely inappropriate for the occasion we had today. But she and Kate really knocked it out of the park.

I personally would have been kind of horrified if she'd have tried to pull off something edgy or quirky or fashion forward. Those kinds of looks are great in plenty of situations, (and maybe at some point we'll see Kate start to do more of that kind of thing), but not, IMO, when you're walking down the aisle of Westminster Abbey to marry the second in line to the British throne.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:40 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,922
I like the dress and angora sweater. She looks lovely!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:01 PM
MRSJ's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 1,844
Personally for me had she stepped on of the car in the second dress she wore tonight I would have been blown away but that being said her dress was lovely! And it was a very nice wedding .....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:14 PM
teruterubouzu's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: somewhere, United States
Posts: 23
I've been lurking here for a bit and am finally posting. I thought she looked absolutely stunning. The cut of the bodice was modern and the classic lace was a beautiful touch. The whole effect was absolutely lovely.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:29 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 65
Kate's dress was timeless. It's still going to look good thirty some odd years or so from now when we're watching highlights of their wedding at the time of William's coronation.

I can see lots of Princess Margaret's dress in the design as well as the Queen's dress and Princess Grace's dress. Kate's dress has a softness to it that Grace's dress doesn't have though.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:34 PM
BritishSwede's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 4
(longtime lurker, finally had to join today to discuss W & C!)

Here is a lovely gallery of Catherine's dress on InStyle magazine's site: Photo Gallery : InStyle.com What's Right Now

The second picture in particular is interesting, it explains that the flowers in her lace are a nod to the national flowers of the UK.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:38 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Heatley, Australia
Posts: 1
I was surprised and letdown with choice of dress, not what I thought she would choose. Going by her usual style I thought something along the lines of the wedding dress Mette Marit wore (imho the most fabulous wedding dress I've ever seen). Classic, clean lines, elegant but understated allowing the real beauty of the bride to shine also. That said, I loved the veil, and tiara, loaned by the Queen and just perfect. Cartier halo tiara from 1936. Indeed a beautiful bride, William as shy and lovely as his Mother. Oh and hi, new to the forums :)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:44 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 7
All the hoopla and overwhelming coverage made the dress a let down for me. I expected something beautiful and showstopping. Her dress was pretty. No where close to Princess Grace. Grace's dress is forever show-stopping and the best royal dress of all time.

Kate's will be forgettable IMO. She made a pretty bride and looked pretty but her overall look isn't one I think will flash in memory 20 years from now as a gorgeous bride.

I expected the guests to be more dressed up. I think I had Victoria's wedding from last year on the brain so I expected the guests to be decked out in gowns and looking their royal best and stuff and not hats and suits looking like Easter service.

Everyone looked so normal. I could have sworn I've seen that yellow suit on the queen before. I just expected everyone to look different than just any old day/event because this was a royal wedding. But is that a British thing? Suits for the wedding over gowns and stuff?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:47 PM
Quathae's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vista, United States
Posts: 271
I thought Katherine's wedding gown was absolutely gorgeous. It reminded me so much of Grace Kelly's wedding gown. I thought Katherine looked lovely. I thought the evening gown was a nice, but a bit plain. Maybe some more embellishment, or a slimmer silhouette would have been nicer, but overall Katherine looked lovely on her special day.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:50 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 28
i noticed something on the evening and morning gown. I thought it wasnt detachable...and thought that theres laces at the bottom of the gown and might be different from the evening one. But I somehow noticed that shes actually wearing a top? and the skirt for the evening instead of the full piece?
If u look carefully, noticed that u can slightly see through the top at her waist area?



.


I must say that Sarah Burton is really terrific! She might even change the concept of wedding dresses for future! hiding it so well!

I'm just guessing hehe after some of u thought and suggested its same piece :P
but then looking at the hard works of sewing i think maybe its two gowns haha! the royals doesnt need to save on one gown!
i dont know!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:50 PM
sesa's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: orange, United States
Posts: 622
When I 1st saw the dress, I thought, hmm...pretty, but nothing spectacular. But once I started reading about the lace and it being hand sewn, the amount of time to make it, the thought that went into it, ect. ect. it made it very beautiful to me. I was suprised at the length of her veil. I thought for sure it would have been the same length as her train, but I'm sure that is just my preference rather than hers.
Overall, given the background of the dress, it is a simply stunning effect.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:05 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyYun View Post
i noticed something on the evening and morning gown. I thought it wasnt detachable...and thought that theres laces at the bottom of the gown and might be different from the evening one. But I somehow noticed that shes actually wearing a top? and the skirt for the evening instead of the full piece?
If u look carefully, noticed that u can slightly see through the top at her waist area?




Hmm looking at the waist area of the day gown..

Maybe I'm wrong..if we can take a look at the back pic of her in evening gown probably see if its same design :P or theres a wrap up lace thingy..or the hooks behind, but owell Sarah Burton is smart enough cos Kate wears a coat over it and just covered on the right area on her back!
I think if it is indeed detachable, I must say that Sarah Burton is really terrific! She might even change the concept of wedding dresses for future! hiding it so well!
My guess: silk strapless top > tuck in lace long sleeves see through > wrap detachable skirt..
and for evening, slip on skirt..
I'm just guessing hehe after some of u thought and suggested its same piece :P

A friend of mine thinks that those are Kate's hip bones that you can see on the evening dress. I think I agree with you that she's wearing a top and a skirt.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:08 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 28
i kinda change my thoughts when i saw the close up that someone posted:
http://img2.timeinc.net/instyle/imag...ess-11-400.jpg

hehe i dont know..just guessing..
whatever it is, its elegant and classic..pretty :P
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:16 PM
Duchessmary's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 1,089
I'm not that loopy, really~~!! The pics of them coming out of CH the light was behind them and the skirt of Catherine's reception dress was transparent. You could see soft trousers.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
prince william & catherine middleton wedding


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catherine Middleton Wedding Dress suggestions and musings Catherine Helvin Prince William and Catherine Middleton - The Royal Wedding, 29 April 2011 562 04-29-2011 05:52 AM
Catherine Middleton Wedding Tiara suggestions and musings Duchessmary Prince William and Catherine Middleton - The Royal Wedding, 29 April 2011 1392 04-29-2011 05:52 AM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge dutch royal history fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg nobility olympics ottoman poland pom pregnancy president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince felipe prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion princess of asturias queen anne-marie queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen rania queen silvia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]