The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Non-Reigning Houses > The Royal Family of Romania

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #981  
Old 06-19-2016, 05:59 PM
LadyRohan's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden, Slovenia
Posts: 395
'The royalists' is not a uniform group, and the succession line was abolished in 1947 and will never be restored. There is one way forward for a monarchy in Romania, and it is along several lines at once. One is to improve knowledge of the Royal Family and the monarchical representatives in Romania. Another is to establish the Royal House as an institution with relevance again in the country. A third is to showcase to everyone within the country what the Royal Family represents, and what monarchy can do for the country.
Nothing else will benefit the monarchy, and will only serve to undermine the cause, and make it seem to those on the outside with less interest in the issue, that people are spending more energy sabotaging each other than uniting in a common goal.
__________________

__________________
"He who has never failed to reach perfection, has a right to be the harshest critic" - Queen Elizabeth II
Reply With Quote
  #982  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:03 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
The royalists advicate to restore the Line of Succession to the role before 1947. To be a part of the republican regime as an institution is completely the opposite.
That is not a realistic goal and will not be accomplished in the near future.

It's best to pick a minimum acceptable and achievable goal. Restoring the Royal Family to an official and prominent role as described in the proposed legislation, although different than its role before 1948, is achievable, and is about to be achieved.

As I've said, duties of royal families change over time. Even the duties of the US President and Vice President have changed over time and are probably somewhat different than in 1947. Life goes on, and it's impossible for anyone to have exactly the same life and job that s/he had in 1947.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #983  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:04 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
The royalists should unite their efforts to promote the Monarchy ignoring those members of the King's Family that want their Family to be a structure of a stronger republic.
Reply With Quote
  #984  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:07 PM
MAfan's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N/A, Italy
Posts: 5,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
The King is too frail to really get involved in this story.
But that doesn't mean necessarily that he doesn't agree with the idea of reaching the agreement with the government, does it?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #985  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:40 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAfan View Post
But that doesn't mean necessarily that he doesn't agree with the idea of reaching the agreement with the government, does it?
Who could really know that?
Reply With Quote
  #986  
Old 06-19-2016, 07:01 PM
LadyRohan's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden, Slovenia
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
Who could really know that?
If we all, you included, are admitting that none of us know the thinking of the King, we have already taken a step forward.
__________________
"He who has never failed to reach perfection, has a right to be the harshest critic" - Queen Elizabeth II
Reply With Quote
  #987  
Old 06-19-2016, 07:50 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
The King has always wanted the restoration of Monarchy.
Reply With Quote
  #988  
Old 06-22-2016, 08:39 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Important royalist personalities like Doina Cornea (symbol of the fight against communism during Ceausescu regime), Acad. Alexandru Zub, Prof. Dr. Nicolae Constantinescu, Prof. Dr. Nicolae Șerban Tanașoca, artist George Tzipoia,Lect. Univ. dr. Viorel Burlacu and leaders of the Movement for Kingdom and Crown like Marilena Rotaru and others and leaders of the Monarchist Clubs like Dr. Dan Marinca and others signed a Petition asking the President.Government, Parliament and political parties to stop the project regarding an institutional role of the Royal House in the republic. In the same time they ask Princess Margareta not to accept it either:


"Din respect pentru Rege și pentru martirii închisorilor comuniste.
Din respect pentru poporul român, a cărui voinţă a fost călcată în picioare în decembrie 1947 la simulacrul prin care a fost abolită Monarhia şi Constituţia din 1923 de către o adunare (ne)reprezentativă, și din respect pentru Majestatea Sa Regele Mihai, considerăm că a sosit momentul unei clarificări care să repună în drepturi adevărul. În lipsa unor asemenea acţiuni orice încercare de introducere a unor jumătăţi de măsură este strict politicianistă, cu un substrat perfid preelectoral şi trebuie taxată ca atare.
Iată de ce ne manifestăm deschis îngrijorarea față de acțiunea Partidului Social Democrat, moștenitor direct al fostului partid comunist, autorul înlăturării prin teroare și forță a Monarhiei din România, de a da o nouă lovitură Coroanei, asimilând-o unei instituții republicane. Tentativa actuală a partidului, al cărui președinte de onoare este Ion Iliescu, se înscrie în continuarea acelorași demersuri aplicate din 1990 Regelui Mihai, când a fost, nu o dată, împiedicat să revină în Țară, prin acțiuni de sorginte sovietică.
”Astăzi, o colaborare cu regimul instalat la putere, spunea Regele Mihai într-o convorbire cu Philippe Viguié Desplaces, mi se pare nerealistă. Totul ne desparte. Mentalitățile noastre, viziunea pe care o avem despre țara noastră și despre viitorul ei sunt diametral opuse. (…) Monarhia constituțională a fost suprimată în 1947, de către o putere străină și agenții locali ai acesteia, fără ca poporul să-și poată spune cuvântul. A accepta această abolire ca un fapt împlinit, înseamnă a conferi legitimitate întregii perioade comuniste, fiecăruia dintre actele sale. Comunismul nu are nici un fel de legitimitate în România și, în consecință, aplicarea forțată a abdicării mele din 1947 este nulă și neavenită.”
Ce alt argument mai solid pentru demonstrarea faptului că instituționalizarea Casei Regale înseamnă legitimarea abdicării forțate și ilegale a Regelui Mihai la 30 decembrie 1947?!
Dacă Partidul Social Democrat s-ar fi delimitat de trecutul său întunecat, și-ar fi dorit să-și exprime respectul și prețuirea pentru Majestatea Sa Regele Mihai, n-ar fi trebuit decât să restabilească normalitatea, cinstea și moralitatea: adică să pledeze pentru restaurarea monarhiei. Bunele intenții față de Monarhie, ale PSD-ului și ale oricărui alt partid politic pot fi probate prin trei gesturi prealabile, teste ale unei bune credinţe faţă de Insituţia Monarhică şi faţă de poporul român:
1) Declararea zilei de 10 Mai ca zi națională și sărbătoare a independenței cu zi liberă.
2) Revenirea la drapelul național cu stema în forma votată de parlament în 1922
3) Revizuirea Constituției cu eliminarea aliniatului 3 din art. 152 (forma republicană nu poate fi revizuită).
Cine s-a opus vreme de 25 de ani acestor gesturi firești? În primul rând, PSD-ul.
Singurul act de referință la reglementările din Statutul Casei Regale, susținut și evocat de nenumărate ori de Regele Mihai, este Constituția din 1923. Numai Parlamentul transformat în Adunare Constituantă poate, împreună cu Casa Regală, să aprobe acest statut, după acceptarea amendamentelor ce se impun în textul Constituției monarhice. Altfel, atâta vreme cât România este republică, Statutul Casei Regale, cu modificările Regelui Mihai (din 2007 și august 2016) este funcțional doar în interiorul Familiei Regale.
Monarhia nu a fost niciodată abolită în România prin voința liber exprimată a poporului. Acum, prin formule juridico-administrative, care nu sunt decât expresia mascată a unei tranzacții de cumpărare, asistăm la încercarea principalului partid politic din România de a compromite nu doar Statutul Coroanei, ci toată jertfa Regelui Mihai în anii exilului, ca și a poporului român, care nu a iubit niciodată comunismul. Întregul neam românesc a rămas, prin coloana sa vertebrală reprezentată de cei care au avut curajul să i se opună cu prețul vieții și al celor două milioane de destine frânte în închisori, lagăre și deportări sau exilați la marginea societății, dar și prin toată ființa sa - străin de regimul de ocupație sovieto -comunist. Românii nu și-au părăsit nici în acei ani de teroare credința în Dumnezeu și Rege. Monarhia a unit. Republica a dezbinat și a terorizat, iar în zilele noastre se dovedeşte incapabilă de a reintroduce normalitatea în ţară (legi stabile şi planuri pe termen lung, care să fie respectate indiferent de culoarea politică a guvernanţilor).
Avem speranța că, după o adâncă și dreaptă cumpănire, în respectul față de înaintași și față de deviza Casei Regale, Nihil sine Deo, Alteța Sa Regală, Principesa Margareta, Custodele Coroanei, va ține departe acest dar otrăvit. Scenariul pus la cale de principala forță politică din țară, prin care aceasta se revendică încă o dată drept o formațiune politică neocomunistă este menit să anihileze pentru todeauna Monarhia și jertfa tuturor celor care și-au sfârșit zilele pentru Țară și Rege.
Contribuția Monarhiei la clădirea României moderne, democratice și prospere, valoarea sa de patrimoniu istoric și spiritual, nu poate fi anulată printr-un gest care este deopotrivă o tentativă de subminare a prestigiului Coroanei și de aservire a Casei Regale.
Solicităm Președintelui României, Guvernului, și, nu numai PSD-ului, ci și tuturor partidelor politice implicate în această "instituţionalizare republicană" a Casei Regale, și tuturor instituțiilor statului să păstreze limitele decenței și respectului pentru ceea ce a însemnat și înseamnă Regele Mihai și Coroana României și să înceteze demersurile anunțate public.
Singura schimbare de care are nevoie acum România este revenirea, pe calea cea mai dreaptă, la monarhia constituțională.
Trăiască Regele!"

Doina Cornea Č™i mai multe personalitÄƒČ›i ACUZÄ‚ vânzarea Casei Regale
Reply With Quote
  #989  
Old 06-23-2016, 09:58 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 5,936

I wonder in what fantasy these figures live? Phantasialand? They should sink on their bare knees and thank the republican government for acknowledging the historic role of the former royal family and give them semi-official role. What alse are these folks expecting? My eyes are rolling with disbelief! I hope Princess Margarita is wise enough to grab the opportunity with both hands!
Reply With Quote
  #990  
Old 06-23-2016, 10:38 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Despite the protests of the royalists the government published today the project of law regarding an institutional role of the "Royal House" in the republican state. The project was prepared by the government and by the Elisabeta Palace. The public debate starts only now and many could think if such a law is not against the constitution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post

I wonder in what fantasy these figures live? Phantasialand? They should sink on their bare knees and thank the republican government for acknowledging the historic role of the former royal family and give them semi-official role. What alse are these folks expecting? My eyes are rolling with disbelief! I hope Princess Margarita is wise enough to grab the opportunity with both hands!
These Romanian personalities want the restoration of Monarchy and not a law that closes the possibility for a restoration. They are very respected intellectuals and they know very well what their country really needs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSENYC View Post
That is not a realistic goal and will not be accomplished in the near future.

It's best to pick a minimum acceptable and achievable goal. Restoring the Royal Family to an official and prominent role as described in the proposed legislation, although different than its role before 1948, is achievable, and is about to be achieved.

As I've said, duties of royal families change over time. Even the duties of the US President and Vice President have changed over time and are probably somewhat different than in 1947. Life goes on, and it's impossible for anyone to have exactly the same life and job that s/he had in 1947.
So accepting to give up the restoration of Monarchy and work as an "institution" of the republic?This is not only absurd but probably even against the republican Constitution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post

I wonder in what fantasy these figures live? Phantasialand? They should sink on their bare knees and thank the republican government for acknowledging the historic role of the former royal family and give them semi-official role. What alse are these folks expecting? My eyes are rolling with disbelief! I hope Princess Margarita is wise enough to grab the opportunity with both hands!
Do you know who is Doina Cornea?Do you know who is Alexandru Zub?Do you know who is Marilena Rotaru?How can you speak like this about personalities widely respected by the Romanians?
Reply With Quote
  #991  
Old 06-23-2016, 01:33 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 5,936
No I do not know them but my estimation from the sideline is that a restoration will never happen. Then you have to make an assessment and count the blessings. A republican government in a former communist dictature is acknowledging the role of the monarchy, which ended more than 70 years ago. They eventually want to provide in budget, in staffing and in organization? Boy... grab it with both hands and use this "level" to consolidate a new position as Royal House and go furtherer, maybe to another level.

The stance of the die-hard monarchists is: "No, we do not want a semi-official position in the republic. We want restoration of the monarchy!" The English have a great saying for that: "Pennywise but poundfoolish".
Reply With Quote
  #992  
Old 06-23-2016, 01:41 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
No I do not know them but my estimation from the sideline is that a restoration will never happen. Then you have to make an assessment and count the blessings. A republican government in a former communist dictature is acknowledging the role of the monarchy, which ended more than 70 years ago. They eventually want to provide in budget, in staffing and in organization? Boy... grab it with both hands and use this "level" to consolidate a new position as Royal House and go furtherer, maybe to another level.

The stance of the die-hard monarchists is: "No, we do not want a semi-official position in the republic. We want restoration of the monarchy!" The English have a great saying for that: "Pennywise but poundfoolish".
You are speaking from abroad and you are judging very important and respected personalities that are Romanians.
Becoming an institution of the republic means to forget all the history of the Royal House and all the ideals of generations. And only for benefits ( a palace free of charge ,funds,etc)...sad...
Reply With Quote
  #993  
Old 06-23-2016, 01:56 PM
MAfan's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N/A, Italy
Posts: 5,536
Well, that's what King Michael has already done some years ago. He is a citizen of the Republic of Romania, officially acknowledged as a former Head of State of Romania and gets some benefits for this reason (a palace free of charges, funds, car, office, etc...).
Yet, I can't recall many protests from the royalists because he has accepted this settlement, officialized by a law of the Republic of Romania approved by the republican parliament (but - still - I'm also one who speaks from abroad and doesn't know the so-called "romanian realities").

Besides that, personally I find interesting and funny that those who have screamed for years that each and every Romanian constitution approved after the 1923 one were illegal acts, unlawfully approved, that "de iure" Romania should still be considered as a parliamentary monarchy, etc etc etc, are now worried that a law could possibly not be in compliance with the last (and current) of those constitutions.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #994  
Old 06-23-2016, 02:07 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
The King has always wanted the restoration of the Monarchy and he has never spoken about the Royal House as an institution of the republican system.
Reply With Quote
  #995  
Old 06-23-2016, 02:08 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAfan View Post
Well, that's what King Michael has already done some years ago. He is a citizen of the Republic of Romania, officially acknowledged as a former Head of State of Romania and gets some benefits for this reason (a palace free of charges, funds, car, office, etc...).
Yet, I can't recall many protests from the royalists because he has accepted this settlement, officialized by a law of the Republic of Romania approved by the republican parliament (but - still - I'm also one who speaks from abroad and doesn't know the so-called "romanian realities").

Besides that, personally I find interesting and funny that those who have screamed for years that each and every Romanian constitution approved after the 1923 one were illegal acts, unlawfully approved, that "de iure" Romania should still be considered as a parliamentary monarchy, etc etc etc, are now worried that a law could possibly not be in compliance with the last (and current) of those constitutions.
A republic does not give laws about the Royal Houses. That's an absolute contradiction.
Reply With Quote
  #996  
Old 06-23-2016, 05:52 PM
MAfan's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N/A, Italy
Posts: 5,536
And where is it written? Who says so? It is a fact that many republics have laws regarding their former royal houses.
The proposed law would ensure that, after King Michael's death, the Royal Family will continue to have the necessary means to perform their activities; if they play their cards well, they may even succeed to persuade the majority of the Romanians that the monarchy is a useful institution and that the monarchy as a form of government could be a good thing for the country. But without such means, I cannot see how could any restoration happen.
What if the line of the more extremist and "more-royalist-than-the-king-himself" passed? In a few years you'd have the descendants of a former royal house, without any role, without a funcion to perform, without funds. People who, at a point, shoud go to find a job and live their normal, ordinary and private lives. Then please don't complain because they aren't in their (former) country full time to play the King-in-waiting.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #997  
Old 06-23-2016, 06:20 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
If the Monarchy will ever return it won't be anyway with the descendants of the King now engaged in this compromise.
Reply With Quote
  #998  
Old 06-23-2016, 06:46 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kingdom, Heard and McDonald Islands
Posts: 4,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAfan View Post
And where is it written? Who says so? It is a fact that many republics have laws regarding their former royal houses.
The proposed law would ensure that, after King Michael's death, the Royal Family will continue to have the necessary means to perform their activities; if they play their cards well, they may even succeed to persuade the majority of the Romanians that the monarchy is a useful institution and that the monarchy as a form of government could be a good thing for the country. But without such means, I cannot see how could any restoration happen.
What if the line of the more extremist and "more-royalist-than-the-king-himself" passed? In a few years you'd have the descendants of a former royal house, without any role, without a funcion to perform, without funds. People who, at a point, shoud go to find a job and live their normal, ordinary and private lives. Then please don't complain because they aren't in their (former) country full time to play the King-in-waiting.
It is a pity you do not read the comments of the Romanian royalists on what's going on.
Reply With Quote
  #999  
Old 06-23-2016, 06:59 PM
MAfan's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: N/A, Italy
Posts: 5,536
Oh, yes, of course, I forgot that for some odd reason one day the Romanians should call the Prince of Hohenzollern to be their King, who will for sure out of nowhere leave his life in Germany to become King of the land where his great-great-uncle once reigned...

Anyway, if this is the premise and if the "descendants of the King" won't have any place in the future Romanian monarchy, why are the romanian royalist personalities worried that the compromise might cause some harm to the monarchy?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #1000  
Old 06-23-2016, 07:08 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 5,936
Look at the former royal families in Germany: Hannover, Bavaria, Hohenzollern, Lippe, Württemberg, Hessen, Baden, Waldeck-Pyrmont, etc. All of them have made agreements with the state and with the various Bundesländer. For an example the State of Bavaria still pays an annual compensation to the Wittelsbachers, almost 100 years after the collapse of the monarchies. These former royal families still enjoy wealth, reside on their ancestral castles, are living from family assets and explore vast dominions: the former royal and aristocratic families are by far the biggest private landowners in Germany.

Before the current Romanian republic, the immensely royal and darkblue blooded Michael was an impoverished man, living with his equally immensely blueblooded Bourbon-Parma spouse out there in Switzerland, cut off from all and everything he once owned in Romania. In the current republic King Michael has been acknowledged by presidents, he has addressed the republican Parliament, the republican Government has returned properties and gave (and still give) assistance in finances, in staffing, in houding, in facilitating. They even allow Romanian military to have a ceremonial role connected with the former royal family. In fact a semi-formal position for the former Royal House woul be a great and symbolic recognition of the non-official coexistence sinct the fall oj Frauces u.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monarchy and Restoration; Rival Families and Claimants aj00192557 The Imperial Family of Russia 955 08-03-2015 03:49 PM
Is the Morocco Monarchy in Trouble? tenngirl Royal Family of Morocco 33 04-26-2011 08:17 AM




Popular Tags
ascot 2016 best gown best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit catherine middleton style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge dutch state visit e-mail fashion poll grand duke jean greece josephine-charlotte kate middleton king abdullah ii king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand nobel gala norway november 2016 october 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week pierre casiraghi portugal prince bernhard prince charles princess charlene outfits princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen mathilde's daytime fashion queen mathildes outfits queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania fashion royal fashion september 2016 state visit state visit to denmark succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises