He also changed the subject when asked if he would be willing to be King if the Romanians wanted it.
He said that just because you read something in the media does not mean it is true, and that he would not comment on his personal life. But that was a direct response to being asked about the woman so it could mean he was emphasizing that rumour as not true. But he did evade all the rumours. Obviously the rumours aren't all true since they contradict each other. He also said he was not given a reason when he was striped of his titles and job; and there had been no discussion beforehand either, it just came out of the blue. He says he still has no idea why it happened, so maybe he has not done any of it.
He said that since then there was been a wall between him and some family members; and that he has been prevented from seeing his grandparents. His mother and aunt Sophie have recently gone to Switzerland, and before them Maria and Margarita but not Irina. So does being taken out of succession mean you can't visit King Michael and Queen Anne anymore?
Only Mr Nedforth Mills knows really what is true and what's not true from what the press wrote about last august events. One thing is sure: nobody really seem to have spoken with him before those events. You can't really take a decision about a man and not even have a chat with him first.
On the Facebook Page Nicolae de Roumanie Medforth Mills very interesting message of the 17th of June :" Coroana României nu poate fi aşezată preş în fața nimănui.Nihil Sine Deo!".
Is this Page administered directly by Mr Medforth Mills?
https://www.facebook.com/PrincipeleNicolaealRomaniei/?fref=ts
That is his side of the story. In reality probably he was summoned to give an explanation to the King, or his aunt Margareta, or maybe even his mother Elena - with whom he seems on non-speaking terms too. The story "Oh, they have stripped me of my title, they have removed me from the succession, and I do not have any clue why..." is really hard to believe. Seen the massive internal fall-out in the family, absolutely something has happened which was considered as unacceptable for the royal family.
Wandering around at a baptism of a baby of one of the three pretenders for the defunct French throne will not help his position in Romania. Jean and Philomena d'Orléans seem very likeable persons with a warm heart but we must not overreacting the attendance of Nicholas Medforth-Mills at a French baptism.
Nicholas could use a lot more than plain sympathy from Romanian monarchists, in particular, if ever there is to be much of a future for the monarchical project in the country.
Open support and calls for the return of the young prince would be a good start.
Sorry, but what is your point?
One is rather confused as to how it actually adds to the discussion at hand (i.e. Prince Nicholas).
I had (and I still do have) great admiration for Nicholas.
His grandfather decided to make him a prince and to ask him to represent Romania from within the Royal Family. Sounds like a fairytale - but he changed his life for the sake of his grandfather's request and worked hard to make something of the request.
He learned the country's language, moved from his home to Bucharest, learned about the country's history and culture, carried out engagement and set up charitable interests and became a popular member of the family.
Then he was sent away again.
Certainly Mr Medforth Mills was the most popular member of the Kin's Family after the King himself.
You oppose the changes in the line of succession: cutting the House of Hohenzollern out. At the same time you seem to see Mr Medforth-Mills as only reliable candidate. Did I understand this correctly?
He can only be a candidate when he is re-instated back into the michaelist line of succession which you seem to oppose. So you are not clear in what you want. Hohenzollern? Or Medforth-Mills?