Reports have recently appeared in the Romanian press suggesting that Prince Nicholas lost his succession rights after a very brief affair with Nicoleta Cîrjan which resulted in a pregnancy.
Neither the lady or gentleman in question has commented on the parentage of the unborn child.
The baby, a girl, is due in early 2016.
Royal Musings: is a baby the reason Nicholas Medforth-Mills lost his succession rights and title.
This article goes into more detail as to why such an occurrence may have caused the reaction of Royal House.
EXCLUSIV/ FLUX 24 dezvăluie SECRETUL alungării Prințului Nicolae: Un copil nedorit de Casa Regală și BĂTĂLIA PENTRU AVERE
So if I understand this: Nicoleta ended a six year relationship, claims to have had an unprotected fling with Nicholas and that she then took a morning after pill but it failed. I am not saying that she is lying, she may honestly believe that, but what if she is wrong? I have seen stats from the US where when there is a paternity test, that in 1/3 of the cases the man the woman said was the father was not the father and many had genuinely believed it. What if it is true about the fling but that the morning after pill did work and that the child is a result of the 6 year relationship. In the second article they have her at first last summer claiming the child to be a boy but say now she claims it to be a girl. Here they do not like to confirm sex before 23 weeks and I know cases where they were wrong. Since she is still pregnant (early 2016), she was not that far in May/June. Yet they reportedly acted based on her saying it was a boy and possibly still in her first trimester? Also why were they so adamant on him leaving Romania, if he does have a baby about to be born in Romania - to limit the media attention? From a PR point of view so far this has not been handled well, so do they have a plan for that scenario? If this is about a out of wedlock child, besides being overkill, shouldn't you have proof of paternity first before you act?
Last edited: