![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Portal | Blogs | Articles | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
![]() |
|||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#121
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#122
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well said fromEU!
Mary's job first and foremost is to act as a representative of one of the oldest royal families in the world, not to be a fashion icon. This dress wasn't worn to make a statement...it was worn because it was appropriate for the formality of the evening. Granted, I highly doubt any of us would ever choose this dress for ourselves but then again, none of us will probably ever have a chance to attend such an event. I don't know about any of you, but I've never seen a "doudy housewife" that looks like she does.
__________________
Noelle "In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different." ~Coco Chanel |
|
#124
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now, I don't see a need for members to state "that you all don't have any sense of fashion" or "Mary as a dowdy housewife." First, lets not generalize, if you don't agree with a statement, please don't categorize everyone in a lump saying they have no idea about fashion, for fashion is a very relative thing, what you may like doesn't have to be favored by everyone. Secondly, stating "Mary looks like a dowdy housewife" could be stated a little subtely, using harsh words will only force members to retaliate forcefully and lead to a verbal war, yet again, on the forum--which none of us want.
|
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#126
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#129
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#130
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#131
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do agree with those that the occasion didn't call for a fashoin statement and that too much skin would be offensive to some rather than pleasing. But still I believe that one can still be very formally dressed and have the wow effect as in wow being elegant, suitable to role, age and occasion. And that IMO opinion has not been achieved at these last two occasions.
But even the most flawless pic the wrong robe at times ( look at Caroline of Hanover at the last Monaco National Holiday and you will know what I mean). Maybe these were her two bad taste days of the year and we will see better dresses next time. |
|
#133
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
At first I wasn't sure about the outfit, but I think some of the pictures (due to flashes) didn't do her justice. I can understand why some people think it looks like a housecoat, but upon closer examination I now think it's quite classy and well-coordinated. I think it suits the occasion and can easily be recycled in the future with different coloured dresses underneath. I suspect a lot of thought went into the planning of this outfit to ensure an elegant, yet appropriate outfit that reflects the importance and traditions of this event.
|
|
#135
|
||||
|
||||
|
This argument is really a battle that isn't going to be won.
Some people refuse to think these two dresses are anything but ugly and frumpy and others (myself included) won't stop thinking Mary picked these gowns because of their formality. Maybe we should all just move on?????
__________________
Noelle "In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different." ~Coco Chanel |
|
#136
|
||||
|
||||
|
Formality has nothing to do with it. You can still have the princess formal look and be elegant and up to date. The first dress was so so. The color was divine. I loved it. But, it was way to tight on her stomach. I think that dress was made for her pre-pregnancy figure. She needs to resize it to her much healthier figure. I think the dress just needs to be recycled and altered a little and you got a gorgeous dress. The hair sucks. Plain and simple. Really bad. I love the jewels but they did not work for Mary with the blue dress. I also felt the order was worn a bit sloppy. Alexandra had it on nice but for Mary it looked like an oversized ghetto necklace. The second outfit. Well, her worst one yet. No more to say. I also really like the tapestry. It is really cool and unique.
|
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
it's not like she needs to choose that dress because someone MAKE YOU to rite? I also think that the princesses (especially CPs) have LOTS and if not more TONS of choices in these kinda of dresses, they dun need to stick to the ONLY ONE choice!:) |
|
#138
|
||||
|
||||
|
Keep in mind she probably has very little say in what she wears. She gets the last word, yes, but a team of stylists are to blame/praise when it comes to any celebrity looking bad/good.
__________________
Noelle "In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different." ~Coco Chanel |
|
#139
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Elspeth; 01-06-2006 at 03:37 PM. Reason: Fix tags in quoted bit |
|
#140
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think she looked very beautiful, elegant, formal with much dignity fit for a future queen. Her gown is gorgeous from the close ups seen in CPMB.
http://crownprincessmary.ipbhost.com...pic=3748&st=30 Last edited by Harmony; 01-04-2006 at 08:10 PM. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| danish new year levee, danish royals |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opening of Parliament (Folketinget) 2003 to 2009 | Josefine | Royal House of Denmark | 246 | 10-09-2009 12:59 PM |
| Crown Princess Mary Scholarship Event: 2005,2006,2007,2008,2009 | norwegianne | Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary and Family | 73 | 05-23-2009 12:52 PM |
| Holiday in Dubai - New year 2008-2009 | Princess Robijn | Prince and Princess of Orange and Family | 34 | 02-13-2009 02:39 AM |
| Pascua Militar; 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 | Alexandria | Royal Family of Spain | 317 | 01-08-2009 03:42 PM |
| Royal Danish Family Christmas 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008 | paulette | Royal House of Denmark | 181 | 01-08-2009 01:50 PM |