 |
|

03-07-2007, 12:28 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My Home, United States
Posts: 704
|
|
|
Two questions:
1) Is Alexandra's title, Countess, hereditary for any future children she might have?
2) Would this child, if she is expecting, carry the title, or would it pass onto one of her son's that are Prince's?
Just wondering...
|

03-07-2007, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,061
|
|
|
I obviously have no idea if it's really true. But it seems that a rumor such as this wouldn't creep up so soon. I could be wrong about that. But it just would make sense that there are still enough other stories surrounding this union that it wouldn't need a pregnancy rumor on top of everything else. So it seems to me that Alexandra being pregnant is definitely very probable. Guess we'll have to wait and see!
|

03-07-2007, 12:32 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 6,021
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RachelD
Two questions:
1) Is Alexandra's title, Countess, hereditary for any future children she might have?
2) Would this child, if she is expecting, carry the title, or would it pass onto one of her son's that are Prince's?
Just wondering...
|
Alexandra's title is personal - and not herditary. If she has children with Martin, they'd most likely carry the surname Jørgensen.
|

03-07-2007, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,061
|
|
|
In order for us to really know that it's true what types of news agencies or newpapers/magazine's are the most credible for things like this? How long can such a rumor like this remain unconfirmed and who would confirm this rumor? Is there a press secretary related with the DRF that might confirm it or does Alexandra have here own press representation to confirm? I'm just curious to know exactly how we will know if this is true or not. Of course in a month or so it might be obvious when looking at Alexandra so maybe that is the only confirmation the public will get.
|

03-07-2007, 12:44 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ciutat Comtal, Spain
Posts: 1,185
|
|
|
Has it been confirmed yet? if it's true than that's great. Congrats to the couple. Felix and Nicolai could be happy to have a new brother or sister. No wonder they got married so soon if it's true
|

03-07-2007, 12:48 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,730
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
I see. A shotgun wedding. How quaint.
|
I doubt they got married because she was pregnant. Did you ever consider that maybe they planned the baby at the same time as the wedding because of Alexandra's age? There hasn't even been a confirmation yet as to whether or not she is pregnant so we can't really assume it was a "shotgun weding".
|

03-07-2007, 01:00 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,841
|
|
|
She's been married a few days and now she's pregnant? If she is pregnant that is. And if she is, she was carrying a bun on her way to the cake shop.
__________________
|

03-07-2007, 01:05 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 256
|
|
|
I think itŽs normal that Alexandra would want to give her new husband a child. How old was P Caroline when she had Alexandra? - about the same age as Alexandra now?
|

03-07-2007, 01:29 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,730
|
|
Yes i realise that IF she is pregnant then she was pregnant at the wedding all I'm saying is that it isn't realistic to say that is why they got married. But that is just my opinion
|

03-07-2007, 01:31 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union City, United States
Posts: 659
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eireann
I think itŽs normal that Alexandra would want to give her new husband a child. How old was P Caroline when she had Alexandra? - about the same age as Alexandra now?
|
Yes. Princess Caroline was born Jan. 23, 1957. She married Prince Ernst on her 42nd birthday, Jan. 23, 1999. Six months later, she gave birth to Princess Alexandra on July 20, 1999.
-Ayvee
|

03-07-2007, 01:35 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,029
|
|
|
the pregnancy must be confired for palace or for alexandras staff?
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
|

03-07-2007, 01:43 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,900
|
|
|
It's nothing to do with the palace, corazon. She isn't a member of the royal family any more.
|

03-07-2007, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My Home, United States
Posts: 704
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by norwegianne
Alexandra's title is personal - and not herditary. If she has children with Martin, they'd most likely carry the surname Jørgensen.
|
Thanks for the answer! And now that I think about it, duh! Someone please slap me up-side the head!  Of course the child/children would carry their fathers surname! I guess this head-cold is really getting to me...
Thanks!
|

03-07-2007, 01:48 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,029
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
It's nothing to do with the palace, corazon. She isn't a member of the royal family any more.
|
oh, thanks.
so, we can't wait for a ''official'' confirmation of this news
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
|

03-07-2007, 01:48 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 83
|
|
She's a 42-yr-old divorceé with two kids who recently married a guy very much her junior in a church in a "white" dress and veil while pregnant.
How very danish.
__________________
It's much easier to be critical than to be correct. - Benjamin Disraeli
|

03-07-2007, 01:52 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lake texoma, United States
Posts: 1,069
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
She's been married a few days and now she's pregnant? If she is pregnant that is. And if she is, she was carrying a bun on her way to the cake shop.
|
thanks for my laugh outloud moment today
if its true i can't say i'm surprised but it makes the over the top wedding kinda tacky. if i remember caroline was married in suits to both her husbands in low key ceremonies. sorry if i offend anybody with my old fashioned way of thinking. if they do want children i think it's great the older you are the harder it gets, so this is a good thing and i wish them happiness.
|

03-07-2007, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 109
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ctejnoe
She's a 42-yr-old divorceé with two kids who recently married a guy very much her junior in a church in a "white" dress and veil while pregnant.
How very danish. 
|
Does this happen often in Denmark? Your comment was cute!
|

03-07-2007, 01:56 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Dakota, United States
Posts: 299
|
|
|
I know. Didn't she just got married?
So it is possiable for a woman get pregnant the same day???
|

03-07-2007, 01:58 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The O.C. Fanatic
I know. Didn't she just got married?
So it is possiable for a woman get pregnant the same day???
|
Yes, but I don't think it's possible that the pregnancy would be able to be detected a week later.
|

03-07-2007, 02:03 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: N/A, France
Posts: 1,636
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
Yes, but I don't think it's possible that the pregnancy would be able to be detected a week later.
|
And even if a baby had been conceived the day she married Martin, she would not have had the time to
- detect it
- announce it to the whole family
- and let the family announce it to the press
She married FOUR days ago.
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|