The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > Princely Family of Monaco > Current Events Archive

Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #61  
Old 04-15-2006, 02:22 PM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laviollette
Is Albert going to make a statement that Jazmin is his daughter in the upcoming People magazine issue? If not then I ask again, what more is there?
Probably nothing more Laviolette, just the same things wrapped in a new package.
Endless re-hashing, as we are seeing here in the Forums (but at People magazine they would call it "journalism").
__________________

__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
  #62  
Old 04-15-2006, 02:35 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
Probably nothing more Laviolette, just the same things wrapped in a new package.
Endless re-hashing, as we are seeing here in the Forums (but at People magazine they would call it "journalism").
Um, if he were I think he would do it through his lawyer and not in People.
__________________

__________________
  #63  
Old 04-15-2006, 03:08 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinklady1991
Um, if he were I think he would do it through his lawyer and not in People.
I'm sure he would that's why the upcoming issue of People is irrelevant if in fact there is something upcoming on the TR story. More rehashing as Warren said. It's the same as the tabloids who claim to document first class travel, lodging, etc. - irrelevant if Albert makes no statement confirming he is the father. Also, it is well known and has been widely discussed on TRF and in the tabloid press that the man TR was married to submitted to a DNA test and was ruled out. Again, old news.
__________________
  #64  
Old 04-15-2006, 03:20 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 122
It's an "upcoming" issue in the weeks ahead.
And it is my understanding it's the American version of the same stuff repeated in Europe -- nothing new. It does state the photos and Birth Certificate is in the court file.
__________________
  #65  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:18 AM
LadyMacAlpine's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: *****, United States
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustWorthy
There were two recent visits published: Monaco at Christmas and Paris two weeks ago. Photographs from the Paris visit were published and they included Thierry LaCoste and Prince Albert. Both articles documented first class travel, escorts, drivers, expensive lodging. Since the board now has restrictions on personal comments I just mention the obvious. Prince Albert is litigious yet he has not sued Tamara, or to remove his name on the birth certificate.

In California birth certificates are public record. Anyone can get a copy with certain required information: Mother name, Mother Maiden name, Father's Name and Father's Mother maiden name, baby name and date of birth. Sadly for all involved this information is known so therefore anyone could have, and did, get a copy.

But here's the REAL answer as to who the source is for both any photos and the birth certificate --- the original 1991 court case filed in California. All these items were submitted to the court as part of the case. So mystery solved once and for all. How do I know this? My sister works at People Magazine in New York and they have the court case like every other magazine would I assume.

Look for upcoming People Magazine issue.
This is your photo from December 2005 taken in Monaco. Go back to look at the photo of the trip to Paris and what you will see is this one of Jazmin with Tamara cut out and pasted with another to make it look as if Albert is walking infront of her which was in Voici. Having had to give press releases over the years due to cases I worked I know what the media can do.


The photo below was taken in WY after the trail and Tamara didn't get the desired results she wanted. It's obvious that Jazmin is a toddler.



This photo below appeared in the press last year and as you can see Jazmin was not a baby but a growing young girl of about age 5 therefore the photo did not come from the court records but a private source. As you can see it is also a posed for photo not taken by the paparatzzz.

All photos have been posted by me before in the Forum on the other threads. It's obvious to those of us following this case all information and photo's is being leaked to the press from a private source who has access to it. Tamara has either given it to them or someone close to her has with her permission or she would have sued them long ago. They are speaking on her behalf so its not likely to sue why she hasn't gone after Bruce McCormick. You don't go after the one on your side no matter if they are your friend or not which I heard he wasn't by someone fighting her case as you are. Also if Tamara didn't like her daughters BC published due to idenity theft she could sue but she hasn't. The media is doing her a favor by keeping this issue alive. It's media blackmail.

Albert has not had any contact with Jazmin according to him in his last published interview and has denied any other children other than Alexandre. People want this to be true for many reasons and each one might be different. The media wants to sell stories just like People Magizine.

People have questioned why Albert doesn't sue over the BC here is the answer.
Quote:
Thierry Lacoste, rises: "That wants nothing to say because, in the United States, the birth certificates are based on simple declarations which are not checked".
© EPA (01/03/2006) I said before its easy to get a man's name on a BC. I listed my father for emergancy contact stating relationship as father. When the papers came to be for final review they had him listed as my childs father. Easy to get the name there or someone else could have signed for it.
__________________
  #66  
Old 04-16-2006, 03:04 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 122
Other than Bunte cover -- these ARE NOT cut and pasted photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyMacAlpine
This is your photo from December 2005 taken in Monaco. Go back to look at the photo of the trip to Paris and what you will see is this one of Jazmin with Tamara cut out and pasted with another to make it look as if Albert is walking infront of her which was in Voici. Having had to give press releases over the years due to cases I worked I know what the media can do.
Other than Bunte cover -- these ARE NOT cut and pasted photos. Can anyone post a larger version of these?






I found these and other photos, some larger and of better quality throughtout this forum. Maybe someone with better talents can enlarge or translate the text?
__________________
  #67  
Old 04-16-2006, 03:40 AM
Suonymona's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: *******, United States
Posts: 830
None of the above are cut and pasted. However, none of them show Jazmin, Tamara, Albert and/or Thierry in any telling combination together in the same photo. They are separate photos published together to illustrate a story. Emphasis on the story. Articles contain facts.

One rag did post a shot that was 'photoshopped'. It appeared to be Albert walking in front of Jazmin to his car. The car photo is in the above pages. Lady Mac posted the photo that was used for the Jazmin part of the trick shot.

I think publishing manipulated pictures and calling them real or "fair use speculation" is just horrid and should be illegal in every country. Its not just the famous royals and celebrities who are embarrassed. Innocent people are hurt from the perceived reality.


Ann
__________________
  #68  
Old 04-16-2006, 07:42 AM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,402
first of all, I do not think BUNTE was trying to make it look like Jazmin and Albert were walking together here: http://files.profilemix.com/2006/04/...3792_03829.jpg

For one thing, Albert's proportioning in the foreground is much larger. Also, this pic of him is obviously from the July 2005 enthronement. So I don't think this was an attempt to make them look like they were walking together. If it was, it was a bad attempt.

Wasn't the paternity question solved? I thought there was a DNA test and it was negative, right? At least, I think that is what the Palace said, but Tamara claims it wasn't done or something like that?
__________________
Chewsteraghi on Tumblr. Schmichaelira on Twitter. Tumblr aka obsessivechewsteraghidisorder. Be warned: I'm weird.
  #69  
Old 04-16-2006, 10:36 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustWorthy
Other than Bunte cover -- these ARE NOT cut and pasted photos. Can anyone post a larger version of these?

I found these and other photos, some larger and of better quality throughtout this forum. Maybe someone with better talents can enlarge or translate the text?
But the none-Bunte photos don't show them together either and you continue to suggest they do without proof and I thought that was against the rules on TRF. These photos don't show them together so why are they continually repeated as showing them together? And if TR has a secret deal with PA then why has she become more visible? Imo she's trying to force his hand and get him to publicly acknowledge Jazmin as he did with Eric Alexandre but PA has not dignified her continued claims with a response.
__________________
  #70  
Old 04-16-2006, 10:48 AM
LadyMacAlpine's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: *****, United States
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio
first of all, I do not think BUNTE was trying to make it look like Jazmin and Albert were walking together here: http://files.profilemix.com/2006/04/...3792_03829.jpg

For one thing, Albert's proportioning in the foreground is much larger. Also, this pic of him is obviously from the July 2005 enthronement. So I don't think this was an attempt to make them look like they were walking together. If it was, it was a bad attempt.

Wasn't the paternity question solved? I thought there was a DNA test and it was negative, right? At least, I think that is what the Palace said, but Tamara claims it wasn't done or something like that?
I have to disagree Bunte was trying to make it appear they were together but I agree it was a poor job. A quick look and people wouldn't know they weren't and would buy the photo's. That is the photo I was talking about of being cut and pasted together. I do believe he was in South Africa when the Rotolo family was in Monaco.

The Palace has always denied the claim. It's been Tamara's claim the Grimaldis were afraid to acknowledge her daughter as being Albert's first born and rightful heir to the Throne as to why they wouldn't allow the DNA testing even though the samples for DNA was given to the Grimaldis. She has maintained had the testing been negative Albert would have announced to the world he wasn't Jazmins father, therefore he knows he is. That was Tamara's comments (not quoted) in 1997-1998 some six to seven years after the court dismissed the case. According to Albert he thought this had gone away until Nicole's story came out about Alexandre. Gone away means dropped as I understand the meanings of the words. He is the Palace that said he was not the father just as his attorney spoke for him after he repeatedly said in interviews that no other claims can be true. If he knows of no other claims that can be true that is a denial. This story is making money for the media like People Magazine which apparently is now getting in the mess of rumors about a child under the age of 18, a minor. I still find this disgusting that any mother can do this to their child and deny them of a safe and normal childhood by placing them on public display. The child is being mentally abused by this whole thing. The press and the public is trying to blame this on Albert when in fact its Tamara not him.

In court records Tamara stated Albert was the only man she was with after she separated from her husband and she was with no other until the child was born. No where did she admit she cheated on her husband while married except with Albert. She has refused to give proof by medical records that Jazmin was premature. If she was born 6 weeks early as she stated there was NO NEED to do DNA testing on David and what was the sense in her doing so if she knew as she claimed from the start Albert was the father? She also used the Grimaldi name before she knew the DNA results or filed a paternity suit. What is there to say she didn't have another affair and it was the cause of her split with David? Sorry the part of me that likes to get evidence to put criminals behind bars is coming out.
__________________
  #71  
Old 04-16-2006, 11:01 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustWorthy
It's an "upcoming" issue in the weeks ahead.
And it is my understanding it's the American version of the same stuff repeated in Europe -- nothing new. It does state the photos and Birth Certificate is in the court file.
How do you know this?
__________________
  #72  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:18 PM
BurberryBrit's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: onthenet, United States
Posts: 1,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustWorthy
Other than Bunte cover -- these ARE NOT cut and pasted photos. Can anyone post a larger version of these?
Yes, these have been posted several pages back. We already saw them. But all they show is PA and his people walking into a building. JR and TR walking around, shopping, walking into a building. They don't show them together in any way. We don't even know if they're in the same building. And the fake cover is the icing on the cake for me as far as the legitimacy of the story they're trying to create with the photos.
__________________
  #73  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:56 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laviollette
But the none-Bunte photos don't show them together either and you continue to suggest they do without proof and I thought that was against the rules on TRF. These photos don't show them together so why are they continually repeated as showing them together? And if TR has a secret deal with PA then why has she become more visible? Imo she's trying to force his hand and get him to publicly acknowledge Jazmin as he did with Eric Alexandre but PA has not dignified her continued claims with a response.
I am not suggesting anything, just pointing out and commenting on what the article which states they were all together at the same hotel.
__________________
  #74  
Old 04-16-2006, 01:29 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,897
So the argument here is whether two people were together somewhere on the basis of photos which shown them separately in what may or may not be the same place at what may or may not be the same time, is that what's going on here?
__________________
  #75  
Old 04-16-2006, 01:30 PM
enchantednights's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
So the argument here is whether two people were together somewhere on the basis of photos which shown them separately in what may or may not be the same place at what may or may not be the same time, is that what's going on here?
as far as i've read, yes.
__________________
  #76  
Old 04-16-2006, 01:42 PM
mw7060a's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio
first of all, I do not think BUNTE was trying to make it look like Jazmin and Albert were walking together here...
I pose this thought....Could it be the photos in BUNTE showing Prince Albert and Jazmin on the same page was done not so much to indicate that they were together in the same place, but rather, to put in the minds of BUNTE's readers to compare physical characteristics to determine paternity? I mean that BUNTE was trying to show or imply to the reader that Jazmin (allegedly) possesses Prince Albert's physical traits as an alleged daughter???
__________________
  #77  
Old 04-16-2006, 01:48 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,897
They could have done that by putting separate photos next to each other.

Did the text in the magazine say anything about the picture being a composite, or did it just give the impression that the two of them were together in the same photo?
__________________
  #78  
Old 04-16-2006, 02:07 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by mw7060a
I pose this thought....Could it be the photos in BUNTE showing Prince Albert and Jazmin on the same page was done not so much to indicate that they were together in the same place, but rather, to put in the minds of BUNTE's readers to compare physical characteristics to determine paternity? I mean that BUNTE was trying to show or imply to the reader that Jazmin (allegedly) possesses Prince Albert's physical traits as an alleged daughter???
what BUNTE was clearly trying to do here was just as any news organization does daily: more than one subject, paste images together not to imply they are together in the same photo but rather the two subjects of the same story. As an example, in yesterday's San Fransico Chronicle there's a photo of Barry Bonds and a Syringe. Is the newspaper implying Barry Bonds uses steroids, is that HIS Syringe -- or is it a story about Barry Bonds, Steroids and the Syringes fans are throwing on the field?

I'm sorry to have to point this out to you, but in looking at any newspaper/magazine cover around the globe you will find a number of photos pasted together to show the subjects of a story -- NOT THAT THEY ARE TOGETHER IN THE SAME PHOTO.
__________________
  #79  
Old 04-16-2006, 02:11 PM
tbhrc's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: *Ruhrgebiet*, Germany
Posts: 9,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
They could have done that by putting separate photos next to each other.

Did the text in the magazine say anything about the picture being a composite, or did it just give the impression that the two of them were together in the same photo?
BUNTE did not say that they were at the same place.... The headline is ' Is this Prince Albert's daughter?'..... That's it.....
__________________
_*_*_tbhrc_*_*_
'I think optimism is a choice one makes. For me, the cup is half full. Or maybe a quarter full. Or at least there is a cup.
Or there could be a cup…' (Princess Caroline of Hanover)
  #80  
Old 04-16-2006, 03:35 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, United States
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustWorthy
what BUNTE was clearly trying to do here was just as any news organization does daily: more than one subject, paste images together not to imply they are together in the same photo but rather the two subjects of the same story. As an example, in yesterday's San Fransico Chronicle there's a photo of Barry Bonds and a Syringe. Is the newspaper implying Barry Bonds uses steroids, is that HIS Syringe -- or is it a story about Barry Bonds, Steroids and the Syringes fans are throwing on the field?

I'm sorry to have to point this out to you, but in looking at any newspaper/magazine cover around the globe you will find a number of photos pasted together to show the subjects of a story -- NOT THAT THEY ARE TOGETHER IN THE SAME PHOTO.
Of course we all know this happens but you continue to re-post these pictures, both the Bunte pasted-together cover photo and the photos of TR and Jazmin put next to the photos of Albert and his lawyer to imply they were together. My point is none of the photos show these people together. One photo is pasted and the others show separate pics of Albert and his lawyer put beside other pics that show TR and Jazmin. We know the pics don't show them together as mentioned in post after post yet we keep having to view the same re-posted pictures implying they were together. Whenever someone doubts TR was in MC to see Albert you put these same pictures up as exhibit A to prove it happened when they don't show anything.
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jazmin Grace Grimaldi Current Events 4 : Feb.2007 - April 2007 Lady Jennifer Current Events Archive 43 04-09-2007 01:14 AM
Jazmin Grace Grimaldi Current Events 3 : June 2006 - Jan.2007 Elspeth Current Events Archive 946 01-29-2007 08:55 PM
Charles and Camilla current events 11: April 2006-June 2006 Warren Current Events Archive 202 06-26-2006 01:27 AM
Jazmin Rotolo (Grimaldi) Part 1 lashinka2002 Prince Albert and Princess Charlene 461 04-03-2006 07:01 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
birth bourbon-parma charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events dutch royal history fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta cristina infanta elena infanta leonor infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg ottoman pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince laurent prince pieter-christiaan princess princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess claire princess elisabeth princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess marie princess mary princess of asturias queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia spain state visit wedding william


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]