The article in dutch (provided by Joris on the Benelux royals MB):
I have read the article and am completely unimpressed.
The fake baron points his arrows first at the biographer of Queen Wilhelmina (Professor Cees Fasseur). According to de Roy the professor claims he could write in all liberty about the RF but Edwin claims that The Queen made him change several passages. Not to shocking IMO, and Edwin gives no other evidence the that he heard this from his wife.
The he goes on about the refusal of the goverment to open the files on the constitutional crisis whiaround faithhealer Greet Hofmans. According to Edwin Prince Bernhard created this as an hoax, to cover up 3 letters of himself that he wrote to Himmler and Hitler in 1942. Again, Edwin has no other sources then ´my wife told me´. He gives no insight about what was written in those letters though.
A terribly weak article, not worth the paper on which it is printed IMO, no evidence whatsoever! I am also annoyed by the language Edwin uses, he goes out of his way to use as many ´difficult´ words and intelligent sentenses as possible, so he can appear clever. IMO it only makes the article tedious to read and shows that he is a snob (my professors would definately make me change something like this).
The fake baron doesn´t use ANY evidence or sources (other then his wife, who of course will deny this all) and uses the foornotes not to show where he got the information but to enlighten us that he is related to the wife of professor Fasseur.
Also creepy: he talks about ´my wife´ all the time.