The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #41  
Old 05-15-2006, 10:32 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 19,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bella
If you think about it, it's actually quite shocking that in the countries where there are still royal families, there is still an adoring public.
Maybe you should broaden your vision. Some people might consider a republican goverment with approval ratings around 30% shocking. A monarchy can at least count on the support of a vast majority as they are above the parties and a-political.
__________________

__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-17-2006, 04:34 AM
Cascadia's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seattle, United States
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo
Maybe you should broaden your vision. Some people might consider a republican goverment with approval ratings around 30% shocking. A monarchy can at least count on the support of a vast majority as they are above the parties and a-political.
Based on that logic, then one would assume you think the best government would be a totalitarian one, where the people wouldn't have any choices and would have a government given to them by a non-constitutional monarchy or a communistic regime. Hard to believe that is really what you believe--but, of course, you might. Chacun a son gout!!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-17-2006, 06:58 AM
Marengo's Avatar
Administrator
Royal Blogger, TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 19,870
I wonder how you can conclude something like that from my post, I think you misunderstood my logic. I never said anything in favour of totalitarian regimes with manipulated approval ratings and only stressed that monarchy and democracy do not have to be a contradiction, while a republic and a democracy do not always have to be the same either.
__________________
TRF Rules and FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-17-2006, 07:25 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo
I wonder how you can conclude something like that from my post...
I'm confused too. How can an apolitical monarchy be equated to a totalitarian government or a communist regime?
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-19-2006, 06:37 AM
Cascadia's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seattle, United States
Posts: 34
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo
I wonder how you can conclude something like that from my post, I think you misunderstood my logic. I never said anything in favour of totalitarian regimes with manipulated approval ratings and only stressed that monarchy and democracy do not have to be a contradiction, while a republic and a democracy do not always have to be the same either.
Sorry if I offended you, but I felt your statement was implying that it would be superior to have a monarchy which people have to accept because they basically cannot change it (even though we know all countries with monachries do not have a totally adoring public) to a republic such as the U.S even if the approval ratings are 30%. Aren't there some rumors of Belgian perphaps eliminating its monarchy. We all know how polls change. Right now they are at 40% -- a change of 10% in about two weeks time. Not sure I understand your last statement about a republic and democracy not always having to be the same either unless you mean a parliamentary system versus a presidential one then I understand that comment. As I said, I didn't mean to offend you and am not trying to get this site blogged down in a discussion of governments. So, please accept my apologies. lol
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12-29-2014, 08:05 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,131
Would Edward VIII of England be considered a shocking royal because of the Abdication?
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shocking shocking Member Introductions 2 10-17-2007 06:37 PM




Popular Tags
australia baltic republics british royal family britishroyals camilla caracciolo charles china clothes current events danish royal family documentary duchessofcambridge duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of edinburgh duke of york family fashion felipe and letizia forum gordon hohenzollern juan carlos kate middleton king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander ladies-in-waiting lord snowdon meghan markle member monarchy nobel prize plantagenets porphyria portugal prince charles prince daniel prince harry prince harry of wales prince laurent princenapoleon prince of belgium princess alexia princess beatrice princess claire queen elisabeth queen elizabeth queen maxima quizz remarriage royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding sarah duchess of york smith spain state visit surname sweden swedish royal family swedish royal registry tom bower tradition wedding windsor castle windsor wedding ww1



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises