The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #381  
Old 09-08-2017, 08:34 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 4,320

I don't know...adventurous, imaginative names can be a pain later in life!
I think it's best to stick with classic, traditional names, especially if you are a member of the RF!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #382  
Old 09-08-2017, 10:39 AM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,995
Since Charlotte and Caroline are basically the same name-a female version of Charles - I doubt if the Cambridges would give the name Caroline to a second daughter.

I am hoping for Victoria, if it's another girl. I love that name.
__________________

__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #383  
Old 01-18-2018, 02:55 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by IloveCP View Post
I doubt they will go for John.The british royals think that name is a curse.
I am quoting this because at times when a child is to be born in the British Royal Family an individual has suggested that John could be used for a boy. However, it is pointed out that John is unlucky because of the two demises: Prince Alexander, the youngest son of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra and Prince John, the youngest son of King George V and Queen Mary.
On July 25, 1970 a son was born to Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Katharine, Duchess of Kent. He was named Nicholas Charles Edward JONATHAN. If the name John is considered unlucky to British Royals, why did Lord Nicholas receive JONATHAN as a middle name?
Reply With Quote
  #384  
Old 01-18-2018, 02:59 PM
Lee-Z's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands
Posts: 2,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
On July 25, 1970 a son was born to Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Katharine, Duchess of Kent. He was named Nicholas Charles Edward JONATHAN. If the name John is considered unlucky to British Royals, why did Lord Nicholas receive JONATHAN as a middle name?
Because John is a familyname from his mother's side (her grandfather and greatgrandfather are named John, afaik)?
__________________
Wisdom begins in wonder - Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #385  
Old 01-18-2018, 03:48 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
I am quoting this because at times when a child is to be born in the British Royal Family an individual has suggested that John could be used for a boy. However, it is pointed out that John is unlucky because of the two demises: Prince Alexander, the youngest son of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra and Prince John, the youngest son of King George V and Queen Mary.
On July 25, 1970 a son was born to Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Katharine, Duchess of Kent. He was named Nicholas Charles Edward JONATHAN. If the name John is considered unlucky to British Royals, why did Lord Nicholas receive JONATHAN as a middle name?
jonathan is Not the same name as John.
Reply With Quote
  #386  
Old 01-18-2018, 03:58 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 1,864
I would indeed say that choosing Jonathan indtead of John might actually proof the point that John itself is considered unlucky, so they picked a different name that has some resemblance (but with different roots; nobody would confuse them in Hebrew I guess) - the only thing they have in common is the reference to God.

Roots:
John from Yochanan = God is gracious
Jonathan from Yonathan = God has given
(God as in JHWH/Jehovah/Yahweh)
Reply With Quote
  #387  
Old 01-18-2018, 05:12 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,310
They are not the same name. I don't know why Nicholas Windsor has the name Jonathan but it is probalbly after a relative.. or godparent.
Reply With Quote
  #388  
Old 01-18-2018, 10:38 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,976
While not the same name (in Hebrew), John is often used as a nickname for Johnathan/Jonothan, which leads to people's confusion.

Considering the abundance of John's in Katherine's family, it likely was chosen as an alternative to John. Katherine's mother Joyce was a scion of the Brummer baronetcy. Joyce's father, grandfather and great-grandfather were all named John. Joyce's father broke the pattern when he named his son Felix John, but Joyce's nephew, the current baron, is also John. Katherine had three older brothers. The youngest of them is named John, and the eldest of them had John as a middle name.

Its not uncommon to use another 'form' of a name to honor family. While in Hebrew, they are different names, in English they are often considered forms of each other (even if wrongly so).
Reply With Quote
  #389  
Old 01-19-2018, 02:55 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,310
Well I don't know anything about Kath Kents' famly but John is a pretty common name. however it is nothing to do with Jonathan as a name. And I don't see that there would have been an issue with using John as a middle name... it has even been used by the RF as a "called name" but I think that after the sad cases of Q Mary's son John dying young and Q Alexandra's baby dying at birth, the RF aren't likey to use it for some time more, as the "given name".
Reply With Quote
  #390  
Old 01-19-2018, 02:48 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,000
Queen Alexandra's son was actually Prince Alexander John. Why do the British Royals not consider Alexander unlucky?
Reply With Quote
  #391  
Old 01-19-2018, 02:59 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
Queen Alexandra's son was actually Prince Alexander John. Why do the British Royals not consider Alexander unlucky?

John has a long history of being an unfortunate name in the BRF, and is most considered unlucky because of Prince John, son of George VI and Mary (the most recent holder).

Alexander has a much more varied history and is generally considered okay because while some holders did not fair well (like Alexander John), others have - it helps that the feminine forms were in Queen Victoria and Queen Alexandra’s names. It is also the name of three Scottish Kings, who I don’t believe are remembered negatively - in contrast to John of England who is remembered very negatively and John Balliol (of Scotland), who likewise... not remembered very fondly.
Reply With Quote
  #392  
Old 01-19-2018, 03:05 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
Queen Alexandra's son was actually Prince Alexander John. Why do the British Royals not consider Alexander unlucky?
why would they?
Reply With Quote
  #393  
Old 01-19-2018, 03:06 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,844
There were several relatives, monarchs bearing the name Alexander when Alexandra and Bertie's son was born, notably the father in law of Alexandra's sister Dagmar/Marie of Russia, and Marie's husband was also an Alexander, so it probably wouldn't have been considered very diplomatic to reject the name, whereas 'John' was fairly generic.

I do think it was the death of young John, King George V's son, that put the final seal on it being considered unlucky, though. And after all, the sole John who was an English monarch wasn't exactly a popular fellow!
Reply With Quote
  #394  
Old 01-19-2018, 03:16 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,310
I thnk that Alexandra's baby was called Alexander after her, and John because it was an old English name - he was intended to be known as John. But then the poor liltte thing died at birth. So that made the name which had not been used for ages and ages, seem unlucky. Then George V's little son was ill and died young. so I think that the RF just don't like the name..
Reply With Quote
  #395  
Old 07-15-2018, 09:32 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,000
It would be nice if a male heir, a future King of Sweden, was given the name of Johan (John). There has not been a King Johan of Sweden since Johan III was King from 1568 to 1592.
Reply With Quote
  #396  
Old 07-15-2018, 11:50 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
It would be nice if a male heir, a future King of Sweden, was given the name of Johan (John). There has not been a King Johan of Sweden since Johan III was King from 1568 to 1592.



It would be intresting if Estelle will give rher firstborn child name which was used only rarely or not very long time.


And it would be nice to see king Magnus on throne of modern Norway. That names hasn't been used since Middle Ages when Norway was independent kingdom.
Reply With Quote
  #397  
Old 08-11-2018, 09:16 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 4,000
It would be nice if a male heir, a future King of Spain, was given the name of Sancho. There has not been a Sancho since Sancho VII was King of Navarre from 1194 until 1234 and Sancho IV was King of Castile from 1248 until 1295.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible names and godparents for Joachim & Marie's baby principessa Prince Joachim, Princess Marie and Family 390 07-26-2009 11:56 AM
Names for Märtha's 3rd baby Her_Majesty Princess Märtha Louise, Ari Behn and Family 69 10-02-2008 12:07 AM
Possible Names for Louis and Tessy's Second Baby crm2317 Prince Felix, Princess Claire, Prince Louis, Princess Alexandra, Prince Sebastien and Families 6 07-11-2007 12:41 PM
Suggestion for baby names? norwegianne Princess Märtha Louise, Ari Behn and Family 19 04-08-2005 09:06 AM




Popular Tags
archduchess marie astrid book british royal family camilla ceremony china chris o'neill crown princess victoria current events duke of cambridge england family fashion general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta pilar infanta sofia interests iñaki urdangarín juan carlos king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle monaco monarchy news nobel nobel prize piromallo porphyria prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess alexia princess claire princess elisabeth princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess margaretha of luxembourg princess of asturias princess victoria public image queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family tiara victoria wedding windsor windsor castle ww1



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises