The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
View Poll Results: Who's the most beautiful royal woman?
Princess Diana 60 10.07%
Princess Beatrice 1 0.17%
Princess Eugenie 3 0.50%
Crown Princess Mathilde 21 3.52%
Crown Princess Mary 79 13.26%
Countess Alexandra 5 0.84%
Crown Princess Maxima 14 2.35%
Princess Laurentien 1 0.17%
Princess Mabel 0 0%
Queen Noor 6 1.01%
Queen Rania 76 12.75%
Princess Alexandra of Luxembourg 9 1.51%
Princess Grace 81 13.59%
Princess Caroline 29 4.87%
Princess Stephanie 1 0.17%
Charlotte Casiraghi 38 6.38%
Crown Princess Mette-Marit 16 2.68%
Princess Märtha Louise 7 1.17%
Crown Princess Letizia 56 9.40%
Infanta Elena 0 0%
Infanta Cristina 9 1.51%
Crown Princess Victoria 15 2.52%
Princess Madeleine 40 6.71%
Other 29 4.87%
Voters: 596. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #601  
Old 09-07-2016, 02:56 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,106
Royals not necessarily need to look like models. Stéphanie de Luxembourg, Camilla of Cornwall, Máxima of the Netherlands, Mathilde de Belgique, Catherine of Cambridge they all look pretty regular, nothing special. And I think that is good. That royals marry with models is not a recommended way, I think.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #602  
Old 09-07-2016, 08:41 AM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
I agree with you on Princess Märtha Louise. She is very beautiful in my eyes and also has a warm radiation.
I am genuily pleased that we finally agree on something.

Yes, Martha Louise has really a lovely face: beauitful, fresh and sweet.
__________________

__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
Reply With Quote
  #603  
Old 09-07-2016, 08:54 AM
sthreats's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: midwest, United States
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
I agree about Mary. I saw a few minutes of a film about her recently and the actress who played her was pretty in the usual bland way of actresses nowadays. SO I too was a bit surprised when I looked at a photo of the real Mary. I'd say she's pleasant looking, but no more than that. (and I presume that's after she had the money and attention to dress better anad look more glam as a princess. Fred certainly wasn't (good for him) the sort of man who was dazzled by beauty and picked a girl on the basis of her looks.



Diana grew into her looks, as a girl she was pretty and dressed ok. As she matured, she did sometimes overdo things like bleaching her hair and she was too thin.. which made her look washed out. But as she got over the bulimia, (I think having seen her in RL that her skin DID suffer from that), she grew into a real beauty. But she had flaws in her face, as you say, which IMO made it more interesting.

And the camera loved her.

Camilla now is no more than average looking and never was anyting more, but Charles clearly love her for something inside.

Why are Camilla 's look young or old constantly being trashed. The thread is who is most beautiful not who is not. Same in regard to Diana and her nose-what's the point?
Reply With Quote
  #604  
Old 09-07-2016, 08:55 AM
Frelinghighness's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England, United States
Posts: 4,816
Queen Mathilda, letitizia and Madeline are the most beautiful royals of this era. Princess grace and Paola of their era.
Not all women age badly, omo. We could have another thread for women of a certain age beauty. Paola has aged quite badly.
Reply With Quote
  #605  
Old 09-07-2016, 09:10 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty91charmed View Post
I am genuily pleased that we finally agree on something.

Yes, Martha Louise has really a lovely face: beauitful, fresh and sweet.
It's actually the second thing we agree on
Sometimes people unexpectedly find common ground

She also has a very mature look about her, in like that she knows what she is doing. Feet on the ground, so to say. I don't know, she just has *something* and she's a very beautiful woman in general. IMO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frelinghighness View Post
Queen Mathilda, letitizia and Madeline are the most beautiful royals of this era. Princess grace and Paola of their era.
Not all women age badly, omo. We could have another thread for women of a certain age beauty. Paola has aged quite badly.
Queen Letizia I totally disagree with. Neither beautiful nor pretty. She isn't ugly but I'll pass.
Princess Madeleine... Well, she does have her looks, but that's about the only thing I can say about her. She has looks that are more beauty-pageant like. She's pretty, imo, but not beautiful per se.

On Queen Paola I agree. There is a heap of difference between her then and now. And some women don't seem to age at all, in comparision.
Reply With Quote
  #606  
Old 09-07-2016, 09:13 AM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,077
[QUOTE=Skippy;1922022]It's actually the second thing we agree on
Sometimes people unexpectedly find common ground

She also has a very mature look about her, in like that she knows what she is doing. Feet on the ground, so to say. I don't know, she just has *something* and she's a very beautiful woman in general. IMO



I don't even follow much the norwegian royal family ( along with other royal family as well), butMartha Louise would always be on the first positions on my personal "royal women beauty contest"...
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
Reply With Quote
  #607  
Old 09-07-2016, 09:42 AM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
Royals not necessarily need to look like models. Stéphanie de Luxembourg, Camilla of Cornwall, Máxima of the Netherlands, Mathilde de Belgique, Catherine of Cambridge they all look pretty regular, nothing special. And I think that is good. That royals marry with models is not a recommended way, I think.
I don't find any of the above women truly average looking with the exception of the Duchess of Cornwall. And even she, I suspect, had something even as a young woman that transcended physical beauty. Men were said to really go for her when she was young. I saw a photo of her from the '60's and while she never had Lady Diana Spencer's radiant English Rose persona, Camilla was quite pretty.

I cannot imagine anyone describing Queen Maxima as "average looking". She is a tall, big boned, striking woman with warm deep brown eyes and a dazzling smile. She isn't beautiful but she would stand definitely out in a crowd.

I don't find Catherine Cambridge beautiful but I wouldn't really call her average either. She has amazing legs and hair, and like Maxima her height will always give her a bit of advantage.

Stephanie de Lannoy is not a conventional beauty, but she has a flawless skin, beautiful hair and the 2nd best set of legs in Royal Europe behind the Duchess of Cambridge. I know people who have met her who attest that her photographs don't do her justice. I suspect that in the 14th to 16th centuries Stephanie would have been considered a knockout. She looks exactly like what she is in fact, a northern European blue blood, complete with aquiline nose which isn't in fashion now but was all the rage during the Middle Ages to Renaissance period.

The only current Royal female who really looks like a model is, imo, the Queen of Bhutan. Charlotte Casiraghi doesn't have the height or the figure of a supermodel but she certainly has the face(even though she isn't really what she used to be)
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #608  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:04 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 78
Among the royal born ladies, I like the Monaco princesses most - Caroline, Charlotte and Pauline Ducruet. I am also a fan of Jazmin Grace, but not sure if she counts for "royal born"...

The other women, puh. I liked Diana and now Madeleine, but the both are more "cute" and sympathic, but not beautiful in the meaning of the word.

The greatest beauties are Viktoria of Bourbon-Parma, Claire and Tessy of Luxemburg and Marie (not Mary!) of Denmark. And of course, queen Sylvia.

Queen Maxima and the Duchess of Cambridge are very, very pretty, but in a way you just remember their nice faces for being steadily in the press.

Letizia looks like the queen of snow form the Andersen tale. Beautiful but cold. Mary of Denmark is the other way around, not really pretty but that lovable I always forget this.

One of my favourites is Annemarie of Bourbon-Parma, my first thinking when I see pictures of her ist about warmth and sun, this woman has a special kind of lovelyness.

Crown princess Victoria and Zara Tindall are not pretty at all but have so shiny personalities that you don't mind.
Reply With Quote
  #609  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:24 AM
Empress Merel's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
True (current and alive) beauties to me are Charlotte Casiraghi, Queen Jetsun Pema, Sheikha Mozah, Queen Rania, Princess Caroline, Princess Marie, Pauline Ducruet, Princess Madeleine, Princess Ameerah, Princess Sofia, Lalla Salma, Haya and Princess Claire. But I think most Royal ladies do have a certain je ne sais quoi about them that makes them stand out. In particular Màxima, Mary, and Victoria.

I do find it a bit strange that it's often stated that certain Royal ladies, in particular Camilla (singling her out here) may not be considered all that attractive, but she had something within that made Charles and other men fall for her. In my opinion, almost all of the Royal men punched above their weight. Charles did so twice.
Reply With Quote
  #610  
Old 09-07-2016, 11:06 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,901
Really? I woudl say that Charles and Camilla match in looks; nether of them is dazzlingly good looking. Camilla is said to have sex appeal, she's an earthy horsey sort of gal, and men like that in her. But clearly Charles loves her for something deeper than looks.
I like interesting looks, so while Diana may not technicaly be the most beautiful of the princesses, she had IMO enough natural beauty to pass as a beauty and enough flaws ot make her face interesting. "Regular" or perfect features can be bland...
Reply With Quote
  #611  
Old 09-07-2016, 11:12 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by sthreats View Post
Why are Camilla 's look young or old constantly being trashed. The thread is who is most beautiful not who is not. Same in regard to Diana and her nose-what's the point?
Diana is beautiful but her nose was crooked. That's a fact... what's wrong with stating that?
Reply With Quote
  #612  
Old 09-07-2016, 11:14 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,901
[QUOTE=Marty91charmed;1922025]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
It's actually the second thing we agree on
S
I don't even follow much the norwegian royal family ( along with other royal family as well), butMartha Louise would always be on the first positions on my personal "royal women beauty contest"...
She is very very pretty and youthful looking, Martha Louise.
Reply With Quote
  #613  
Old 09-07-2016, 01:25 PM
Lee-Z's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Heerlen, Netherlands
Posts: 2,648
Am in the mood for lists so here goes

Best looking this year, division "ladies over 18":
P.Madeleine of Sweden
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge
Queen Rania of Jordan
P.Märtha-Louise of Norway
P.Benedikte of Denmark (i honestly think that she gets better looking every year)

Best looking this year, division "men over 18":
K.Felipe of Spain
P.Nikolai of Denmark (okay, i cheated, he's only 17 )
P.Maurits of the Netherlands
P.Michael of Kent (especially in a suit )
(still thinking about a fifth name...maybe i can list K.Felipe twice? )

Best looking at some point in time, ladies over 18
P.Caroline of Monaco (early 80's)
P.Madeleine of Sweden (practically any year)
Q.Silvia of Sweden (late 70's)
P.Margaret Rose of the UK (1950's)
P.Margriet of the NL (60's)

But ofcourse, my opinion can be different tomorrow
__________________
Wisdom begins in wonder - Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #614  
Old 09-12-2016, 12:41 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,901
Of men I think that George VI was very handsome. Charles is no looker but he looks interesting! IMO which can be attractive. Andrew had rather florid good looks as a young man which ran to fat soon.
Of women I think that Princess Michael is very striking looking, perhaps not strictly beautiful but even in her forties very attractive and had lovley hair. Sarah F too had loveley hair, it seems to have faded bit and I think she should NEVER Cut it.. that looked awful. (I'm jealous of women with a striking hair colour like goldeny or red)
Reply With Quote
  #615  
Old 09-12-2016, 02:28 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,106
On the age of 77 looking like this.... wow!
HRH Princess Irene of the Netherlands two days ago (opening Museum Voorlinden in Wassenaar, with her nephew King Willem-Alexander)

Picture and picture

The same Princess in 1966, looking absolutely fabulous picture next to her husband Prince Carlos de Bourbon de Parme.
Reply With Quote
  #616  
Old 09-12-2016, 03:08 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,901
I think she looks far beter in the later photo, she's kept her figure and looks very smart
Reply With Quote
  #617  
Old 01-23-2018, 04:19 AM
IloveCP's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -, United States
Posts: 9,943
Other royal women I find beautiful are Lady Amelia Windsor, Princess Rajaa of Jordan, Princess Talita Natasha von Fürstenberg, and Beatrice of Monaco.
Reply With Quote
  #618  
Old 01-23-2018, 05:14 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,759
I agree about Talita von Furstenburg and Beatrice Casiraghi...both truly stunning aristocratic women.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
Reply With Quote
  #619  
Old 01-23-2018, 10:20 PM
XeniaCasaraghi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas, United States
Posts: 3,276
How would you classify Meghan? She's definitely on a different level of looks than Harry, but I personally don't find her particularly pretty. She has a sparkle about her.

Went back to my post from 2013 and I have no idea why I put Mette-Marit on my list. Her son is a doll but turning heads she is not.
Jetsun is also up there with the great royal beauties: Grace, Paola and Margaret.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
Countess Stephanie of Belgium October 20, 2012
Reply With Quote
  #620  
Old 01-23-2018, 10:48 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 509
Meghan is gorgeous! She's not aristocratic-looking (whatever that means), but still beautiful. What's more, she'll still be beautiful into her 60s--her mom is very young looking in her early 60s.

Grace was beautiful. So was Diana, but not when she was in her 20s--only in her early 30s or so. Lady Amelia is okay looking. Her skin is beautiful, but while I think her features are nice and symmetrical, she's not particularly interesting to look at.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
camilla caracciolo carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess victoria crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events danish royal family denmark family fashion felipe and letizia general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín james bond king felipe king felipe and queen letizia current events king felipe vi king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia lord snowdon meghan markle miguel urdangarin news norwegian royal family porphyria prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince guillaume prince harry prince harry of wales prince louis prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess victoria pyrmont queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima question royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding shaikh zayed bin hamdan bin zayed al nahyan state visit stephanie succession sweden swedish royal family theatre victoria waldeck wedding windsor wedding



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises