 |
|

11-15-2011, 07:17 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 113
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen
That kind of eye make up is very fashionable or is supposedly fashionable these days and you see it on a lot of women and girls going out on nights out or university bar crawls/student nights. Particularly in the larger cities such as York, London, Newcastle and Manchester. To me, they just look like they have black eyes. 
|
I see smoky eyes more smudged than heavy But I agree with you they do look like a pair of black eyes. Let's hope the fashion moves on quickly
Thanks everyone for replies
|

11-15-2011, 11:23 AM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EIIR
I'm 26 and live in the UK, although not in England, so I'm pretty much in the same age group as Kate and her sister. I would say that the trend among people our age has become more and more towards very dark, smoky eyes with the rim of the eyes very well defined. This is why Kate's make up is so unremarkable to me, I see it on friends and colleagues on a daily basis.
There is no 'class' issue here, I feel it is generic among a certain generation.
|
Thank you for sharing. You're from the same generation so you''ll be in tune with what is "in" for your age group.
|

11-15-2011, 07:51 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,059
|
|
|
ok i also would like it if kate and sophie would have switch hats..jmo
__________________
ain' no sunshine when i gone
|

11-16-2011, 01:22 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 47
|
|
|
I have been wondering why the Duchess of Cambridge has never worn any Victoria Beckham dresses. The media has indicated that the Beckham's and the Duke and Duchess are friends. I fully expected that she would wear a Victoria Beckham design during their time in California, but she didn't. Just wondering.
|

11-16-2011, 01:53 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 1,493
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duchessrachel
I have been wondering why the Duchess of Cambridge has never worn any Victoria Beckham dresses. The media has indicated that the Beckham's and the Duke and Duchess are friends. I fully expected that she would wear a Victoria Beckham design during their time in California, but she didn't. Just wondering.
|
Probably for that reason :) She most likely doesn't want to look as if she's promoting a friend's business or "playing favorites".
|

11-17-2011, 02:26 AM
|
 |
Super ModeratorBlog Editor Royal Blogger Picture of the Month Assistant Coordinator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: -, France
Posts: 16,412
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duchessrachel
I have been wondering why the Duchess of Cambridge has never worn any Victoria Beckham dresses. The media has indicated that the Beckham's and the Duke and Duchess are friends. I fully expected that she would wear a Victoria Beckham design during their time in California, but she didn't. Just wondering.
|
Maybe the outfits she has from Victoria have not called for the right event yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione
Probably for that reason :) She most likely doesn't want to look as if she's promoting a friend's business or "playing favorites".
|
I don't think that would be the case since Kate tends to wear different designers and not stick to just one.
|

11-18-2011, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
I love Victoria Beckham, her style and most of her fashion creations. If I was Kate I would be wearing her clothes, but thats only because Vic is my fashion mentor.
Kate's eyeliner hardly bothers me, but during the Remembrance Day celebration it was more the amount of blush and foundation that bothered me.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

11-18-2011, 06:42 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 4,647
|
|
Kate shopping today in London. Thanks to lancchick from the DofCam current events thread:
Kate Middleton Shopping at Zara Pictures
Kate looks very refreshingly casual today. She's wearing her standard black boots and a handbag I've seen before, I think for her departure for Canada, that I've always liked. The skirt is cute, but reminds me a lot of my Catholic schoolgirl days when we used to roll our pleated skirts up waaaay past our knees.  And is it me, or are the boots too gappy around the calf? I think they'd look better with jeans tucked in them. It also doesn't make sense to cover up with that heavy turtleneck if she's leaving her bare legs exposed; I know I'd be feeling the chill.
|

11-18-2011, 08:44 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 1,493
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baroness of Books
|
She looks beautiful! So happy and casual, but in an elegant way. And the shot of her engagement ring is particularly nice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazzling
I don't think that would be the case since Kate tends to wear different designers and not stick to just one.
|
I seem to remember an article from during the engagement that said that Victoria had sent Kate a bunch of dresses, but Kate sent them back because she's been advised not to take free/deeply discounted clothes.
Did I make that up in my head, or does anyone else remember reading that?
Granted, we don't know if it's true or not.
|

11-18-2011, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
I think I remember Sarah Ferguson getting criticized for taking free gifts from people. I know some of them were trips and plane tickets.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

11-19-2011, 02:10 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: My own head, United States
Posts: 5,924
|
|
|
She looks great. Very youthful and classy at the same time.
__________________
"My guiding principles in life are to be honest, genuine, thoughtful and caring".
~Prince William~
I'm not obsessed with royalty...I just think intensely about it.
|

11-19-2011, 03:07 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 1,493
|
|
|
Also, I just noticed Kate is wearing what looks like her charm bracelet that has her cypher and Camilla's on it. I love that it's a favored piece of casual jewelry that she just wears when she's out and about.
|

11-19-2011, 05:48 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Somewhere, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,624
|
|
|
I covet her Mulberry handbag immensely. If only I had a spare £850 lying around!
|

11-19-2011, 09:10 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: -, Poland
Posts: 1,802
|
|
|
Nice and comfortable outfit for shopping. But Kate should eat something, she looks terrible skinny.
|

11-19-2011, 11:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: --, Portugal
Posts: 5,811
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baroness of Books
|
She's wearing Mulberry: Polly Push Lock Skirt (£ 395) and Polly Push Lock Tote (£ 895)
|

11-19-2011, 03:41 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator Picture of the Month Representative - Monaco and Sweden
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 22,282
|
|
|
__________________
As a general reminder: fashion threads are for fashion discussions only,
please use the current event's/news threads for all other themes in connection with certain appearances.
Again several off topic posts have been deleted!
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
|

11-19-2011, 05:28 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,170
|
|
|
I don't see bare legs, I see tights. I don't think it would be possible for a real (unzippered) boot to fit over her feet and be any less in circumference than these are - her legs are very thin, which is why there's a gap which wouldn't be there on most wearers of this type of boot. We're accustomed to seeing a more seamless boot/leg on other women.
As I said on the other thread, it's refreshing to see her in motion, with her hair swinging and looking relaxed and casual. She looks glad to be shopping.
|

11-20-2011, 10:04 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 4,647
|
|
 Oops, yes, I meant bare legs in contrast to wearing jeans or slacks in what seems to be chilly weather; obviously she is wearing dark tights. It is a cute look, nevertheless.
|

11-20-2011, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,959
|
|
|
I love Mulberry as well and she looks lovely with her 2 amazing pieces am I jealous ... YES!!!!!
|

11-20-2011, 07:45 PM
|
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,059
|
|
|
has anyone notice that kate seems to be wearing flats lately...hmmmm whats up with that and im not implying anything
__________________
ain' no sunshine when i gone
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|