 |
|

11-28-2011, 07:42 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: -, Poland
Posts: 1,802
|
|
|
Her skin is damaged by the sun (she lived for many years in Australia) and now after many cosmetic treatments (especially peelings) she must be more careful. But compared to 11 years younger Kate, Mary looks really good.
|

11-28-2011, 07:55 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 255
|
|
This is a real photo of Princess Mary in Gala.
I think don't have photoshop...
http://www.hola.com/imagenes//realez...spedida--z.jpg
__________________
"Right now we have our hands full"
|

11-28-2011, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator Picture of the Month Representative - Monaco and Sweden
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 22,222
|
|
|
__________________
Time to get back to the topic of this thread - skin problems and photoshopping are no real fashion topics - thanks!
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
|

11-28-2011, 09:30 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 1,218
|
|
|
I think Mary still looks amazing and I love her earrings
|

11-28-2011, 11:27 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: las vegas, United States
Posts: 2,182
|
|
|
I am so in love with this dress and her loooks, the earings stunning! wonder who made this dress any one knows? from all the CP i think this is the only one who i would love to see her closet! wouldnt mind to try some of her dresses
__________________
Ashelen
|

11-29-2011, 07:04 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,965
|
|
|
Mary looked stunning in that dress!
|

01-01-2012, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,965
|
|
Mary wore a repeated but modified gown at the New Year's reception:
[DNF] Fotoarchief Denieuwsfoto
Even though I do prefer the original version,I thought she looked great! I love the color and the jewels.
|

01-01-2012, 03:23 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: daytona beach, United States
Posts: 1,935
|
|
|
Very nice. Such a regal look for Mary!
|

01-01-2012, 03:26 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 601
|
|
|
There would have been a lot of (wasted) fine velvet in that dress if it were not modified and reworn...
|

01-01-2012, 03:34 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,561
|
|
|
Very pretty! I love the jewels in her hair. I first posted they were from a brooch, but I see in another post that they are part of the tiara.
|

01-01-2012, 03:37 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ANKARA, Turkey
Posts: 538
|
|
|
Love the dress and the jewels. She looks great..
|

01-01-2012, 04:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 15,601
|
|
|
I tend to believe it's a new dress made by the same person who made the other red velvet dress. I understand when royals recycle, but I do grave for new gala dresses occasionally.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

01-01-2012, 04:45 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: las vegas, United States
Posts: 2,182
|
|
|
I have a postcard that a freind send me from a new year a while ago with Alexandra and not with Mary I supponse this was before Mary Married Fred and Alexandra have a very similar dress, I wonder if this was Alexandra dress and they made same changes well not too many just the cleavage?????
__________________
Ashelen
|

01-01-2012, 04:49 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In front of my Mac, United States
Posts: 588
|
|
|
I love this red velvet gown. So lovely, sensual and elegant. Then again, I'm a sucker for velvet gowns :)
|

01-01-2012, 06:00 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Porterville, United States
Posts: 267
|
|
|
I wasn't aware that the cleavage stands out. To me the colors look nice on both of them. Fred looks sharp in the uniform with the black hat on. Of course Mary's old fashioned velvety gown looks good in that pose. They looked pretty once again and I just hope they and everyone had a fabulous new year's celebration. Things seem so good for them and the world so, it's nice to see this new day dawn. Good luck people.
|

01-01-2012, 06:02 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dusseldorf, Germany
Posts: 758
|
|
|
I am not sure whether this is the same dress with modifications as worn a few years ago. It pretty much looks the same but the modifications are too many I think. So maybe it really is a new dress that reminds us to the one she has worn before. But I am not very sure on it..
|

01-01-2012, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bookstacks, United States
Posts: 4,640
|
|
|
Mary looks sensational and that's a gorgeous purple velvet gown that so flatters her coloring. The style is really beautiful as well and that looks like a fishtail train, if I'm not mistaken. I really like that jewel in her hair; I believe it's part of the ruby parure from another thread I've seen.
|

01-01-2012, 06:31 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 3,114
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naggi
I am not sure whether this is the same dress with modifications as worn a few years ago. It pretty much looks the same but the modifications are too many I think. So maybe it really is a new dress that reminds us to the one she has worn before. But I am not very sure on it..
|
I agree. The original dress was elegant and flattering and, if this is the same dress, I would go so far as to say it had been ruined. The front sillohette is completely straight and figure hugging, and not in a flattering way. It needed a little volume at the waist and in the front of the skirt (a la Queen Margarethe) to give it the required gravitas for such an occasion.
I would go so far as to say that a fabulous train is not sufficient to overcome the obvious deficiencies in the front and, in the end, fabulous colour and material notwithstanding, it did not meet the required standard for a Gala Gown.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

01-01-2012, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cambridge, United States
Posts: 1,273
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IloveCP
Mary wore a repeated but modified gown at the New Year's reception:
[DNF] Fotoarchief Denieuwsfoto
Even though I do prefer the original version,I thought she looked great! I love the color and the jewels.
|
The dress looks nice on the Danish crown princess although I don't like that it's velvet but it's nice anyways.
__________________
" An ugly baby is a very nasty object, and the prettiest is frightful when undressed."
- Queen Victoria
|

01-01-2012, 07:19 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England, United States
Posts: 1,484
|
|
|
I think it's the same dress that's been altered because of the new, set in waist, and also because of the "skimpiness" of the front as Marg above mentioned. I remember thinking the maternity dress was skimpy in front also.
The maternity version had a scoop neck and empire waist. All you would have to do is to cut off the original bodice on the front from the waist up, ripping out the sides. Put in a new front bodice piece, stitch it across the waist and sides. Then add a new waistband all around. The bell-like sleeves are the same.
We have a really nice picture of the back and the train, I don't remember the old train.
All this depends upon saving some old fabric and having it match after 5 years, lol!
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|