The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #41  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:56 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
The queen mother had more then u thought an article written just after she passed claimed she left them over 230 million pounds And get this Royals don't have to pay tax on the estate so no death dues divide that up is a pretty nice pile
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:01 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,110
Anything the Queen Mother left to anyone other than The Queen was subject to Death Duties. Only monarch to monarch is death duties' free.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:21 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 409
It is completely unfair that the monarch does not have to pay inheritance tax even though every other citizen does where necessary. The monarch should not be above the law.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:37 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
Yes, but I doubt that she got all that much if the Queen Mother left an inheritance to all of her grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

(At least, it probably wouldn't be enough to fund that sort of lifestyle).
The Queen Mother didn't leave anything to her grandchildren. In 1994 2/3 of her money fortune, at the time 19 million pounds, went into a trust fund for her great grandchildren and Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto, on the gamble that she would live another 7 years and therefore avoid the 40% tax. It's perfectly legal and anyone can do it, and it's a gamble that paid off.

Source: The gamble that foiled the taxman | UK news | The Guardian

Given the length of time the Queen Mother Trust held that money for Beatrice and Eugenie, who would have been 6 and 4 at the time the money was invested, it likely had 15 - 20 years to grow - and then there is the trust fund that Her Majesty The Queen set up for Beatrice and Eugenie when Andrew and Sarah divorced in 1996, when the Princesses were 8 and 6, again, another 15 years to grow at the minimum.

And who knows if Sarah saved money for her girls - although she has encountered many financial difficulties over the years, Sarah is generous to a fault and it's well known she contributed to her daughter's lifestyle. I would not be at all surprised to discover that some of her earnings went into trust funds for her girls.

Ultimately, the York Princesses are wealthy women in their own right and it's that independent wealth that undoubtedly shapes some of the decisions they take with the roles and duties they wish to/are allowed to pursue as members of the Royal Family and as private citizens in careers.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-30-2015, 10:55 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
But there are ways around it after the queen mother died there was mentioned that The queen mother estate would not be subjected to death taxes since she once was Queen People were pretty mad about it I will see if I can find that article
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 05-01-2015, 12:03 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,110
The law is clear - the Queen Mother didn't have to pay death duties on what she left to The Queen and she left her most of her estate for that reason.


What else she did was set up a trust fund early enough that it was in existence for over 7 years and that was also not subject to death duties. If she had died within that 7 year period it would have been - the same as for everyone else.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-01-2015, 05:26 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
Ann said a long time ago that her children have trust funds set up for them They also got money from the Queen Mother
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-01-2015, 05:53 AM
muriel's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal-blue View Post
It is completely unfair that the monarch does not have to pay inheritance tax even though every other citizen does where necessary. The monarch should not be above the law.
The monarch is not above the law, it is just a different law that applies.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-01-2015, 06:19 AM
Nice Nofret's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 540
The Monach is paying taxes - just not death duties (which in Switzerland, no one has to pay, anyway).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-01-2015, 08:10 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 3,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Royal View Post

And who knows if Sarah saved money for her girls - although she has encountered many financial difficulties over the years, Sarah is generous to a fault and it's well known she contributed to her daughter's lifestyle. I would not be at all surprised to discover that some of her earnings went into trust funds for her girls.
I thought that there was an interview in which Fergie admitted having to use money from those trust funds because she was broke?
So it seems unlikely she'd have contributed to them at any point.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 05-01-2015, 09:51 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by janjan View Post
Ann said a long time ago that her children have trust funds set up for them They also got money from the Queen Mother
No one is disputing that they all have trust funds and money from the Queen Mother in those trust funds.

The facts are that because The Queen Mother set up the trust fund more than 7 years before she died there was no death duties to be paid on that money. That law applies to everyone.

Had she died within the 7 years of setting up the fund then there would have been appropriate taxes to be paid.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-01-2015, 04:12 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
No cause the Queen got Parliament to pass an act my cousin lives in London and was pissed off big time because he thought that she should have paid
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-01-2015, 04:35 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,661
According to www.royal.gov.uk it states

"In 1992, The Queen volunteered to pay income tax and capital gains tax, and since 1993 her personal income has been taxable as for any other taxpayer. The Queen has always been subject to Value Added Tax and pays local rates on a voluntary basis."

This applies to her personal income.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-01-2015, 06:20 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by janjan View Post
No cause the Queen got Parliament to pass an act my cousin lives in London and was pissed off big time because he thought that she should have paid

The Queen cannot dictate to Parliament what they should & should not do.

I think you've been watching too much Wolf Hall. That might have been the case in the days of Henry VIII but it has not applied during this Queen's reign. She had the benefit of customs and laws passed in previous reigns as Iluvbertie and others have pointed out several times.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-01-2015, 08:09 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,110
The tax situation is well known. Until George VI ascended the throne the monarch paid normal taxes like everyone else on income. George VI negotiated not to have to pay the taxes as he had to pay his older brother for Balmoral and Sandringham so from 1937 until 1992 the monarch didn't pay income tax but it was George VI who negotiated that right not The Queen.

As has been pointed out, she was forced to agree to voluntarily pay tax in 1992 (Charles had been voluntarily paying tax since he took control of the Cornwall estate in 1969 - paid at 50% until he married Diana when he reduced it to 25% to cover the additional expenses he had in having a wife and family).

In 1894 inheritance tax was introduced in the Finance Act (actually simplified the then existing five laws that covered inheritance laws and taxes into one). In most of those laws the monarch was expressly excluded - so it isn't The Queen but her ancestors from her father back to Queen Victoria and even further back to George III who negotiated those exceptions.

A lot of British people get upset about the financial arrangements to do with the monarchy largely out of ignorance and largely because the press likes to stir up the people and use misinformation to do so. I don't know how many times I read about the Civil List and who is supposedly on it - when if people actually do their research they would learn:

a) the Civil List did exist to cover the official expenses of members of the royal family - not their private expenses
b) that in 1992 The Queen agreed to repay to the government the payments made to all members of the royal family other than herself, Philip and her mother.
c) the Civil List itself was abolished in 2012 and replaced with the Sovereign Grant Act that provides The Queen with the money to run her official life, maintain the royal palaces and cover the transport costs. This includes, for instance, all the expenses associated with State Banquets and events like the Garter Ceremony.
d) Charles covers the expenses of himself, Camilla, William, Kate, George and Harry - officially and privately
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:42 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,584
I was thinking about this the other day, someone was asking why the Queen hasn't put all her jewels into a trust fund at the Dutch, Swedish and I think Luxembourg royals have. I guess the most simple answer is that there is no need for her to. While property left by one Sovereign to another is not subject to inheritance tax there is no need for a trust fund, I guess most jewels are put into a trust funds to prevent inheritance tax forcing them to be sold off and to stop the jewels from leaving the royal line. At the moment as long as the Sovereign keeps ownership of the jewels and does not give them away to others then they pass tax free onto the next sovereign, this is almost certainly why all the loans the Queen makes are one offs or 'lifetime loans'.

As for trust funds for her children and grandchildren, it was widely reported that Anne benefitted from a trust fund as a child and I have no doubt the Queen's children and grandchildren have. Surprisingly maybe we hear more about Trust Funds for the grandchildren than we ever have about Trust Funds for the Queens' own children.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-02-2017, 08:26 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,661
Although the monarch has the use of many wonderful treasures from the Crown jewels to the Royal Art collection and many different residences at her disposal, very little of it is actually the Queen's. The Crown Estate holds onto ownership in the name of Britain and it is 15% of the profits from the Crown Estate that is audited and makes up for what the Queen receives in the Sovereign Grant.

Although many things are transferable from sovereign to sovereign specifically, the Queen could not "will" any of these things to specific people.

The Queen's own personal jewelry and land such as Balmoral and Sandringham which are her own personal holdings though are at her discretion but tradition holds that it is transfered monarch to monarch.

Here is a bit of information I found.

The Crown Estate, which runs the Queen's land and property empire, posts record profits of £285.1 million | The Independent
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-02-2017, 09:34 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
Although the monarch has the use of many wonderful treasures from the Crown jewels to the Royal Art collection and many different residences at her disposal, very little of it is actually the Queen's. The Crown Estate holds onto ownership in the name of Britain and it is 15% of the profits from the Crown Estate that is audited and makes up for what the Queen receives in the Sovereign Grant.

Although many things are transferable from sovereign to sovereign specifically, the Queen could not "will" any of these things to specific people.

The Queen's own personal jewelry and land such as Balmoral and Sandringham which are her own personal holdings though are at her discretion but tradition holds that it is transfered monarch to monarch.

Here is a bit of information I found.

The Crown Estate, which runs the Queen's land and property empire, posts record profits of £285.1 million | The Independent

Most of the jewels the Queen wears on a regular basis are owned by her personally and she can leave them to whoever she wants. It is true that most of it will go to Charles, but I'm pretty sure the Queen's younger children will also inherit some items , just as part of Queen Mary's jewels are now with the Gloucesters and the Kents.


The jewels that are part of the Royal Collection are the Crown jewels properly and older pieces dating back to the Victorian age. Pretty much everything acquired or inherited throughout the 20th century is private property.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-02-2017, 10:03 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,661
Ah thanks for explaining that.
__________________

__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, finances, inheritance


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titles of the Dutch Royals eneill Dutch Royals 47 09-18-2015 12:55 PM




Popular Tags
baptism birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events david armstrong-jones denmark earl of snowdon family fascism general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy nassau nazi news opening of parliament philippe piromallo prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess eleonore princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria prince william queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia gowns queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima hats queenmother queen rania casual outfit queen silvia state visit stephanie succession sweden swedish royal family theatre tony armstrong-jones victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises