The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1081  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:06 PM
Angelique's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bruges, Belgium
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Unlike 1952 I don't see everything shutting down for 3 days or so in the immediate aftermath of the Soveriegn's death. Some places might close on the day of the funeral but there will be many people who will still need services as there will be an upturn in travel of people wanting to pay their respects.

The Coronation will be a large spectacle and again places will close on the day near the route but that will be offset by a large increase in tourists into the country - not just for the day either but over the course of the year to see various displays that will be up to mark the occasion.
I SO hope that the Coronation will be a really Royal, Majestic and a wonderful opulent spectacle, with all the gorgeous Royal pomp and circumstance of old. Heavens, we all know how rare such gorgeous Coronations have become! I say, Britannia please rise to the occasion, when it will eventually occur.......
__________________

__________________
A bit of fragrance always clings to the hand that gives you roses.
  #1082  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:06 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Unlike 1952 I don't see everything shutting down for 3 days or so in the immediate aftermath of the Soveriegn's death. Some places might close on the day of the funeral but there will be many people who will still need services as there will be an upturn in travel of people wanting to pay their respects.
Really? I think you will see full scale mourning for more than a day when QEII dies.
__________________

  #1083  
Old 12-30-2012, 10:15 PM
Artemisia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,438

I'm inclined to agree with you, Scooter.

Elizabeth II has been a Monarch for the entire duration of most citizens of the United Kingdom and other Realms; the mourning for her, especially given the sort of popularity, reverence even, she now enjoys will be sincere and most probably on quite a grand scale.
  #1084  
Old 12-31-2012, 01:01 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,496
Charles, I think, has made more of a difference in the UK than his mother has. He had the freedom to actually get out there and do it.

One thing I think we won't have to ever worry about is how Charles will put a mark on the monarchy. If we have to gauge making a difference, I think he will be remembered mostly for the differences he made while being the Prince of Wales. Its very likely that Charles' reign will be remembered more as a bridge between Elizabeth II and William V. (did I get it right this time?)

When I think about it, if Charles does come to the throne in 5-10 years time, in a way it gives Charles the leeway to slow down and just be the monarch he is supposed to be. His Prince's Trust is established and well under good management, he has to curb in his points of view on things, and if William takes over the Prince's Trust, he's training his son.
__________________
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #1085  
Old 12-31-2012, 01:57 AM
AnnEliza's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, United States
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisia View Post


And yet Edward VII lived up to the challenge as Prince Charles undoubtedly will.
Elizabeth II is a fantastic Sovereign, but there were great Monarchs before her, and there will be ones in times to come.
Yes, I have no doubt Charles will live up to the challenge.
  #1086  
Old 12-31-2012, 03:34 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,602
[QUOTE=scooter;1499637]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Unlike 1952 I don't see everything shutting down for 3 days or so in the immediate aftermath of the Soveriegn's death. Some places might close on the day of the funeral but there will be many people who will still need services as there will be an upturn in travel of people wanting to pay their respects.
QUOTE]

Really? I think you will see full scale mourning for more than a day when QEII dies.
I don't think the government would order three days of everything closing, shops, restaurants, businesses etc. That is what happened when George VI died.

Sure there will be mourning with people putting flowers outside BP and queuing to walk past her coffin etc but not to the official extent of 1952.

My parents were on their honeymoon and my dad was told to get everything they would need for the next three days as there would be nothing open - and the only place they could get something to eat was the hotel where they were staying and only the people staying there were allowed to be served - food only mind you, no alcohol and if they hadn't arrived by the time everything shut down, even if they had booked in, they couldn't book in.

That is the sort of mourning I don't see happening - a complete shut-down of the country for three days.
  #1087  
Old 12-31-2012, 04:50 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
That is the sort of mourning I don't see happening - a complete shut-down of the country for three days.
Like you, I think that life will go on as normal when HM passes. Maybe one day of national mourning. I don't see any mass hysteria either as we saw when Diana died.

I think what there will be though is that between the time of the death of Elizabeth II and the coronation of her son, we'll see a lot of focus on the life of HM and it'll be more of a celebration of her life and time as a monarch.
__________________
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #1088  
Old 01-14-2013, 06:30 PM
Angelkiss's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: City, Canada
Posts: 24
If I can put my two cents in, I believe that in the future when William and Harry have their children, their children will be the monarch(yes Harry's included) and then when the grandchildren come around, Harry's will not be apart of the "official" royal and will probably have normal lives. William has stated that he only wants 2 children, and I just don't see just his family will be the monarch that would lead to too much work for so little people, that's why I believe Harry's children will play a big role in the monarch.
  #1089  
Old 01-14-2013, 08:54 PM
nascarlucy's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Florida Area, United States
Posts: 1,424
I see the monarchy becoming more scaled down in the future. By the time Prince Harry has grandchildren, their lives will be very different. They will be royal but they will lead a more normal life than their grandfather. I don't think they will have a lot of restrictions put of them and will have more normal lifestyle. I can see them working at a job full time, and doing things that their grand father and great-grandfather King Charles would never have dreamed of but would have liked to do perhaps if given the chance.
  #1090  
Old 01-14-2013, 08:58 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,582
^A la Zara. Grandchild of the sovereign, with a mostly real, but still highly privileged, life.
  #1091  
Old 01-14-2013, 10:18 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: brisbane, Australia
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
^A la Zara. Grandchild of the sovereign, with a mostly real, but still highly privileged, life.
All the perks and none of the responsibilties?
  #1092  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:45 AM
vkrish's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 962
At Trooping the Colour..

I hope Charles will be fit to ride at Trooping by himself, atleast for the first 10 years of his reign. His father rode till he was 85 (2006), I dont think Charles is anyway less fit/robust than him.
King George VI took carriage in 1950, and couldnt even attend in '51.
And by the time Charles becomes King, Duke of Kent would have gone (atleast from horseback) and Harry would have joined. I wonder Anne will still be there on horseback well into Charles' reign.
After her it will be just Will&Harry behind the King I gues..
  #1093  
Old 01-15-2013, 02:15 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by fearghas View Post
All the perks and none of the responsibilties?
Perhaps, but also the down side like having unwanted media attention on her private life.
  #1094  
Old 01-15-2013, 04:59 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by vkrish View Post
I hope Charles will be fit to ride at Trooping by himself, atleast for the first 10 years of his reign. His father rode till he was 85 (2006), I dont think Charles is anyway less fit/robust than him.
King George VI took carriage in 1950, and couldnt even attend in '51.
And by the time Charles becomes King, Duke of Kent would have gone (atleast from horseback) and Harry would have joined. I wonder Anne will still be there on horseback well into Charles' reign.
After her it will be just Will&Harry behind the King I gues..

Harry riding will depend on him having the appropriate rank in one of the relevant regiments. I am sure he will eventually but he won't be given honourary rank in an army regiment while still a serving officer with strong links to one of those regiments (Household Cavalry).
  #1095  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:03 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,602
Harry's grandchildren will need to have their own lives - just like the current grandchildren of earlier younger sons of a monarch - the children of the Dukes of Gloucester and Kent.

As for Harry's kids - the precedence is being set with Beatrice and Eugenie that the children of the younger sons will also have to work for themselves and I expect the same for Harry's children.

The future of the BRF is a smaller working unit - no doubt. They aren't going to continue with 15 working members as they have now but in time that will be reduced to half a dozen - the monarch and spouse, heir and spouse and maybe a sibling or two.
  #1096  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:25 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Harry's grandchildren will need to have their own lives - just like the current grandchildren of earlier younger sons of a monarch - the children of the Dukes of Gloucester and Kent.

As for Harry's kids - the precedence is being set with Beatrice and Eugenie that the children of the younger sons will also have to work for themselves and I expect the same for Harry's children.

The future of the BRF is a smaller working unit - no doubt. They aren't going to continue with 15 working members as they have now but in time that will be reduced to half a dozen - the monarch and spouse, heir and spouse and maybe a sibling or two.
I don't agree. The half dozen you describe would be, for most of the time, be 4 adults plus children. It's not enough. Harry, his spouse and children will be active - the Royal Foundation spells that out to me as it is based on the original Foundation of Prince William and Harry. That would give you (all things being equal) 8 adults and some children.

I also think that Anne, Andrew, Edward and Sophie will carry on till they drop; and there is every chance that Louise and (speculating here) James could be part time. I cannot see that the Royal family could survive dropping somewhere in the region of c. 450-600+ patronages (est at c. 150 per FT royal). I know that the number is subject to debate but the eventual loss of Charles and Camilla and then Charles' siblings would put too much pressure on William and his direct family.

I am also waiting for someone to tell me the source of the on-going tale of Charles and the smaller monarchy.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
  #1097  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:30 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,223
There's no doubt Anne, Andrew, Edward & Sophie will continue on with their duties but the main focus will be on Charles & Camilla, William & Catherine and Harry and his future wife. I really think that's the best thing for the future of the Monarchy.
  #1098  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:34 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
There's no doubt Anne, Andrew, Edward & Sophie will continue on with their duties but the main focus will be on Charles & Camilla, William & Catherine and Harry and his future wife. I really think that's the best thing for the future of the Monarchy.
I agree with that - Harry and family will be a working part of the royal family into the future
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
  #1099  
Old 01-15-2013, 07:48 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 638
You want to know what Anne, Andrew & Edward will be doing under King Charles, go back and look at Princess Margaret's diary. Due to the big age difference between Charles & Edward, under King William, Edward and possible Andrew will be a close advisor to William. See all the time he spends with QE2, there is a reason for that.
  #1100  
Old 01-16-2013, 12:21 AM
vkrish's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 962
Yup, there will be a lot for them to do under Charles, and possibly William also, though they may not come on balcony or have the same spotlight as of now.
Had Princess Margaret not spoilt her personal life and image, she could have done more for the RF and improved the image of BRF much much more..
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
british, camilla, charles iii, charles of wales, coronation, crown jewels, duchess of cornwall, legacy, prince charles, prince of wales, queen camilla, titles, william v


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Monarchy after Elizabeth II ysbel British Royals 523 05-22-2018 02:06 PM
The Monarchy in Greece Fireweaver The Royal Family of Greece 310 04-09-2018 01:37 PM
Monarchies & Republics: Future and Benefits marian Royalty Past, Present, and Future 425 04-02-2018 05:12 PM
The Monarchy And The Media Alexandria Royal House of Norway 12 04-08-2004 04:06 PM




Popular Tags
archduchess marie astrid baltic republics book camilla china chris o'neill crown princess victoria current events england family fashion general news gordon grand duke henri hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hohenzollern infanta cristina infanta elena infanta leonor infanta margarita infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle monaco monarchy news nobel nobel prize piromallo porphyria portugal prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess alexia princess claire princess elisabeth princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess margaretha of luxembourg princess of asturias princess victoria queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding spanish jewels state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family tiara victoria wedding windsor ww1



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises