The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #3121  
Old 04-30-2017, 05:55 AM
Dee Anna's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Here, Ireland
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
In 30 years time, most likely Charles and Camilla (both will be around 100 years old at that time)will be out of the picture and it will be William and Kate, George and Charlotte and their partners and perhaps little ones.
Indeed, they will be 98 and 99! That's why I put the "- Why not? -"!

But by no means absurd to consider Charles as a spritely or not 98 year old, 30 years on. Or even bypassing the 100 and sending himself a card! But obviously, will not live forever either.

Regardless of when it is, it will be William who will literally take up the reigns(!), not Harry, who does need to establish a role for himself within the Firm and not just as the second son of the King, the younger brother of the King etc. Something I'm sure he has an agenda on, it's the rest of his life after all. As it stands he is an exellent ambassador for the RF, I can see him taking on a more global role in that area, leaving William to concentrate on the homefront as heir or King.
__________________

__________________
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken ..... Oscar Wilde
Reply With Quote
  #3122  
Old 05-05-2017, 11:42 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Westfield, New Jersey, United States
Posts: 150
It would be nice for Charles to include other members of the BRF on the balcony once he is King Charles III or King George VII, in honor of his grandfather.

Andrew, Beatrice, Eugenie, Edward, Sophie, Anne, Timothy, etc. should not be excluded from the balcony.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3123  
Old 05-05-2017, 11:55 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,660
I actually expect him to assemble extended members of the BRF for balcony appearances once he does become King.

We have to remember that Charles has never said anything publicly about how his reign is going to be but there's been a lot of presumptions over the years. Many refer to the balcony appearance during the Diamond Jubilee where it was the Queen, the DoE, Charles and Camilla, William and Kate and Harry.

Its been said that this "hints" at the future of the monarchy but I don't think so. It was a celebration of HM's 60 years years on the throne. It was a celebration of the monarchy itself and its my opinion that the balcony appearance was to show the continuity of the monarchy into the future.

We have to remember that there are three different "groups" if we can call it that for ease of explaining. There is the direct line to the throne and the future of the monarchy itself. There is the extended royal family which, like a lot of families, have aunts and uncles and cousins by the dozens. Then there is the working "Firm". The people that work representing the monarchy.

Charles, to me, is pretty much a traditionalist and I really don't see him wanting to change things overly much. Of course he'll make some changes but I don't expect them to be drastic ones. Perhaps over time and, as we know how the BRF plans and executes things to run smoothly, we'll see gradual changes happening as the BRF plans the transition between the reign of Charles to the reign of William.

Just my opinion of course.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #3124  
Old 05-06-2017, 12:25 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,363
I think he' WILL cut down the RF to a smaller group and if that means having less public appearances he would prefer that to having to support loads of cousins for life because they are "on the duty roster".
in today's world, its possible for them to do a lot on the internet, TV etc, and while I think it is important that some royals do actually get out there and meet people, make actual live speeches and shake hands and go around and see things, we don't need to have hordes of people doing it..
Charles is a traditionalist and he will not ignore his cousins or leave them out of ceremonials that are family based so they will be seen in public at times but they will be free to go and lead their own lives and have their own careers if they want them and he wot be saddled with their upkeep.
In the 80s there was a lot of attention to the RF, In the press and I'm sure he remembers all too well that this meant that people's faults were more obvious to the public and the press's attitude was "if they are donig royal duties then their lives are up for grabs.. and every fault or mistake they make, is good for a story.."
Charles will want to avoid that...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3125  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:07 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,907
Which cousins are we talking about though, the Kents (the Duke and Princess Alexandra) who are in their 80's and have had recent health scares, or the Gloucesters who do a lot of unsung work for the BRF and are Charles and Cam contemporaries in terms of age?

It's lovely to think of untethering the cousins in the future and no doubt none of them would mind, except that their accommodation, Alexandra's flat at St James's, the Kents' Wren House and the Goucesters' large apartment at KP are all given as part payment for work done representing HM at various engagements all over the place.

I doubt that Charles will be up for a whole lot of subsidising large rents for his mother's retired cousins in the event of some MPs turning their attention again (as they have in the past) on grace and favour dwellings inhabited by Royal relatives.

It will be a conundrum IMO in some ways as Charles would hardly want to ask very very elderly people to move out of their homes because they will be regarded as surplus to requirements.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3126  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:18 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,363
He's not going to throw them out or stop supporting them but I'm sure he does not want any other royals on his hands. Of course the older royals are at the point of giving up steady work in the near future and their children (Kents and Gloucesters) have never been involved in the royal duties.
He will let the older ones stay in thier homes until they go and then I suspect he'll be cutting back, and he wont want say the York girls on the payroll..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3127  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:32 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,660
I think the key word here is going to be "transition" as far as the "Firm" goes. He'd not boost the older ones out of their homes and declare them unnecessary but most likely, as they eventually fade out of the picture, he's not going to want to replace them either. That's regarding the "Firm".

As far as the extended British royal family, perhaps eventually we'll be seeing Beatrice and Eugenie with their spouses and children on the balcony for occasions such as Trooping the Color, weddings and events where they're seen as being part of the extended family.

We'll just have to wait and see what happens when the time does come.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #3128  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:47 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 790
But in just 20 years time the working royal family will have thinned. The Gloucesters may still be around but in their late 80s or 90s as will be Charles, Camilla and Anne. Edward, Sophie and Andrew will be in their 70s. George may be in military service and Charlotte just finishing school so neither will be a working royal yet. William, Kate and Harry (and Harry's future wife) will be the middle aged working royals. So at least four or more fewer workers not replaced, and maybe more.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3129  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:54 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I think the key word here is going to be "transition" as far as the "Firm" goes. He'd not boost the older ones out of their homes and declare them unnecessary but most likely, as they eventually fade out of the picture, he's not going to want to replace them either. That's regarding the "Firm".

We'll just have to wait and see what happens when the time does come.
of course he's nto going to throw them out or stop helping them financially, but he will not replace them with other younger royals. Times have changed and the RF needs to be seen as slimmer and less expesnsive..
we'll see Bea and Eugenie at times but they wont be doing royal duties..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3130  
Old 05-06-2017, 04:18 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 18,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
of course he's nto going to throw them out or stop helping them financially, but he will not replace them with other younger royals. Times have changed and the RF needs to be seen as slimmer and less expesnsive..

we'll see Bea and Eugenie at times but they wont be doing royal duties..

I don't really get your point as that's what we have now. Charles' Cousin's don't do a lot in the way of royal engagements and certainly don't get a lot for it. It's different when you take some like the DOG out of the picture than to the DOE, dividing up the engagements that will go with 700+ patronages requires a lot of thought and people.

Whilst you are sure Charles wants a slim down monarchy (which he will get anyway when his Cousin's pass), he has the monarchies appearance out there to think about, and there's nothing like seeing a royal in the flesh as opposed to on YouTube. The monarchy is never going to be less expensive because the same people are still there.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #3131  
Old 05-06-2017, 04:39 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,363
not everyone wants to see royals
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3132  
Old 05-06-2017, 05:58 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,935
Are you saying that when apartments fall empty in KP they should be occupied by the the richest rather than the royal?
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #3133  
Old 05-06-2017, 12:29 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,660
I don't think that places like Kensington Palace will ever be made available for the richest and the greatest. If anything, it will become solely under the HRP (Historical Royal Palaces) and preserved as a national treasure with some of the state rooms still being available for rent for events. One aspect of KP is that it is a logical choice for London residences for members of the BRF as the security and ease of access to London is already in place. I would even bet my last glass of banana strawberry smoothie that Buckingham Palace will become a public national treasure before Kensington Palace does.

There will always be an interest in seeing the royal family in the flesh and interacting with them. Even though social media and videos on YouTube are becoming more and more the way to reach more people, seeing the royal family out and about actually doing things is never going to fade away. I think the Queen said it best when she said "I have to be seen to be believed."

There will always be royal events where the old traditions are still followed such as the State Opening of Parliament and Trooping the Color. Nobody, but nobody, does traditions and pomp and circumstance better than the British.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #3134  
Old 05-06-2017, 12:58 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,108
The state rooms of KP are already under the control of HRP. People aren't going to want to tour the old apartments of the Gloucesters or Kents. I toured BP, Windsor, Tower of London and KP. KP was the least interesting of the four. If it didn't have the ties to Diana and Victoria, I don't think a lot of people would go there. I found the garden the best part. After seeing it once, I don't feel the need to go back.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3135  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:24 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,660
And there, folks, speaks experience of actually *being* there which I've never had the pleasure.

It does kind of confirm in my mind that Buck House would be more of a tourist draw than KP and KP would be more apt to be kept as residences. But this is kind of straying from the topic of the Monarchy under Charles. It does tie in somewhat as I believe I've read places that when Charles becomes King, he may opt to keep Clarence House as his residence. That would make sense if BP is still under major renovations. It would also be a quiet "transition" to move the royal residence of the monarch elsewhere from BP but BP would still be continued to be used for purposes it is now such as state dinners.

The House of Windsor plans things out in advance so completely that changes happen without a whole lot of fanfare over time (*if* you discount the media going berserk and speculating about things). Perhaps their plans that we see in action now are only the tip of the iceberg in even further long range plans.

Come to think of it, I wouldn't even be surprised to learn that all the major work that was done for Apt. 1A at KP wasn't solely for the Cambridge's move in but to assure that KP will be fit for royal residency for decades to come.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #3136  
Old 05-31-2017, 09:24 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 409
With the announcement of the retirement of the DoE, would now be a good time for ghe Queen's cousins to do likewise? This would properly shift the focus to Charles and his immediate family, and free up even more engagements and patronages for the younger royals.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3137  
Old 05-31-2017, 09:54 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 5,121
Please, just let these people who have served Queen and Country all their lives, reach decisions in the fullness of their own time. No one wants to feel nudged to the curb. They want to cross the street on their own terms.
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
Reply With Quote
  #3138  
Old 05-31-2017, 10:05 PM
EllieCat's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 419
Quote:
The state rooms of KP are already under the control of HRP. People aren't going to want to tour the old apartments of the Gloucesters or Kents. I toured BP, Windsor, Tower of London and KP. KP was the least interesting of the four. If it didn't have the ties to Diana and Victoria, I don't think a lot of people would go there. I found the garden the best part. After seeing it once, I don't feel the need to go back.
I visited KP, Windsor, Tower of London and Balmoral (2012). I found them ALL fascinating in their different ways; I really liked KP and the Victoria displays. Those staircases are so easy to walk up; i could imagine a princess in a long gown would have no trouble.

But back to the Monarchy under Charles; i too would not be at all surprised is he keeps his 'home' at Clarence House and the 'business' at BP. That would make sense for future Monarchs too. After all, it's only a hop, skip and jump away. A decorous hop, of course.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3139  
Old 05-31-2017, 10:10 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,935
Sometimes I think people actually think HM runs the BRF like a business. The idea of kicking the olds to the kerb is wrong on just so many levels, the first being that HM is still QEII so the monarchy under Charles is irrelevant.

Further, this idea that Charles could, should or would "retire" the older relatives, let alone evict them from KP is bizarre. I see nothing in his behaviour during his life that would indicate he thinks that people, human beings, family no less, have a ''Use By" date. Quite the contrary as he sees how sharp both his parents still are.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #3140  
Old 06-01-2017, 12:02 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal-blue View Post
With the announcement of the retirement of the DoE, would now be a good time for ghe Queen's cousins to do likewise? This would properly shift the focus to Charles and his immediate family, and free up even more engagements and patronages for the younger royals.
Why should the Gloucester's give up when they are as young as they are? They are only a couple of years older than Charles and Camilla.

The Kent's are older of course - both in their 80s but the Gloucester's were born in 1944 and 1946 with Camilla only a year younger in 1947 and Charles in 1948,
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british, camilla, charles iii, charles of wales, coronation, crown jewels, duchess of cornwall, legacy, prince charles, prince of wales, queen camilla, titles, william v


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monarchies & Republics: Future and Benefits marian Royalty Past, Present, and Future 417 12-01-2017 08:29 PM
The Monarchy after Elizabeth II ysbel British Royals 515 09-28-2017 10:22 PM
The Monarchy in Greece Fireweaver The Royal Family of Greece 309 10-31-2016 06:54 PM
The Monarchy And The Media Alexandria Royal House of Norway 12 04-08-2004 05:06 PM




Popular Tags
birthday british royal history carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria crown princess victoria hats current events denmark duchess of brabant duchess of cambridge earl of snowdon family general news grand duke henri hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín jewels king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein lord snowdon love monarchy monarchy versus republic news official visit paris prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen silvia question soderberg spanish royal family state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria zog



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises