The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2201  
Old 11-07-2015, 08:17 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
Could someone point me to the source of the story that Charles is going to downsize the official BRF?

I'm aware that a couple of royal reporters have said that Charles doesn't think the Queen should personally pay (ie private money) for BRF members to carry out royal duties - that it should come from Sovereign Grant - but that has not been confirmed by CH in any way.

So what's the source?
As far as I can remember, it was tracked back to a comment made by a "little grey man" to somebody else, and so on. Charles has never, ever, made such a comment in public.

The only thing I do know is that HM created "The way ahead" committee consisting of members of the BRF, including all her children.
__________________

__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #2202  
Old 11-07-2015, 08:22 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,008
thank you Marg.

I do enjoy this thread which, apparently, is based entirely on speculation. But it is interesting and wide ranging which I like.
__________________

__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2203  
Old 11-07-2015, 08:28 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
thank you Marg.

I do enjoy this thread which, apparently, is based entirely on speculation. But it is interesting and wide ranging which I like.
I agree. I mean... this thread is just speculation, and that's the only way it could be. None o us, as far as I know, can see into the future. So it's very interesting to see what qualities and attributes people see both in Charles but also the monarchy!
Reply With Quote
  #2204  
Old 11-07-2015, 09:49 PM
Lady Nimue's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pacific Palisades, United States
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
As far as I can remember, it was tracked back to a comment made by a "little grey man" to somebody else, and so on. Charles has never, ever, made such a comment in public.

The only thing I do know is that HM created "The way ahead" committee consisting of members of the BRF, including all her children.
Recently on this forum a poster said that the Way Ahead Committee is no more. It was dissolved.

I think the poster was Iluvbertie.
__________________
Russian National Anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGoNaLjQrV8
O Magnum Mysterium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWU7dyey6yo
Reply With Quote
  #2205  
Old 11-07-2015, 09:55 PM
cepe's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
I agree. I mean... this thread is just speculation, and that's the only way it could be. None o us, as far as I know, can see into the future. So it's very interesting to see what qualities and attributes people see both in Charles but also the monarchy!
I was specifically mentioning the reduction/cutting back of the BRF. It is written about as if people know it is definitely going to happen.

Stuff about how what sort of king he will be has to be speculative - it was just this aspect of reduced numbers.

I was asked about it personally and realised that I thought it would happen and then couldn't nail down why.

That's why I asked.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2206  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:02 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,046
Queen of the spinners

The Queen instigated the “Way Ahead” group, a secret body of advisers and members of the family that met twice a year. It was in this forum that she and Prince Philip agreed that they should start paying income tax. The “minor” royals were taken off the civil list and forced to find salaried work or live off their private fortunes. (That the Way Ahead group no longer meets or even exists is testament to the fact that its work is done.)
Reply With Quote
  #2207  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:14 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
I was specifically mentioning the reduction/cutting back of the BRF. It is written about as if people know it is definitely going to happen.

Stuff about how what sort of king he will be has to be speculative - it was just this aspect of reduced numbers.

I was asked about it personally and realised that I thought it would happen and then couldn't nail down why.

That's why I asked.
Yeah, I know! I was just continuing on how I like the thread even though it's all speculation. I agree fully with you that it should be accknowledged that it's just that. Speculation!
Reply With Quote
  #2208  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:25 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,096
Isn't it a given that everything in this thread is speculation since Charles isn't King yet.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2209  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:26 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
Isn't it a given that everything in this thread is speculation since Charles isn't King yet.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Sure.. But some things have been stated so many times that people belive them to be facts. As the "Charles will be called George", "Charles will downsize the monarchy", "Charles doesn't like Andrew" etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2210  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:31 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,842
Yes, we are all "speculating", but when we quote a decision purported to have been made by the PoW, it is no longer "speculation" it is a "reference". However, there is no evidence that Prince Charles ever made the decision referenced.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #2211  
Old 11-08-2015, 09:07 PM
LauraS3514's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA, United States
Posts: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Add in the fact that in, say 10 years when the Queen, DoE, the Kents, and the Gloucesters are less likely to still be around then Charles, Camilla, and Anne will all be in their 70s, Andrew, Edward, and Sophie will all be in their 60s, and George and Charlotte will not be anywhere near close to being active royals. Which means that the working royal family will consist of 6 people who are (or almost are) at or past the age of retirement, and 3-4 people who are not, assuming the Yorks don't step up. Add in another 10 years and you likely still don't have George and Charlotte being active royals, while Charles, Camilla, and Anne are in their 80s and Andrew, Edward, and Sophie are in their 70s.
I would like to point out that while The Queen, The Duke of Kent & Princess Alexandra and The Duke of Gloucester are all grandchildren of George V, the current Duke of Gloucester is only four years older than The Prince of Wales. He and his Duchess are likely to be doing engagements much longer than, say, the Kents, as they are ten years younger (and nearly twenty years younger than The Queen.)
Reply With Quote
  #2212  
Old 11-09-2015, 01:30 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
Excellent post.
Interesting point is that when the Queen came to the throne, she did not think that she had sufficient #of the family to carry out duties.
There were 7 active at the time (HMQ, DoE, QEQM, PssM, PssMarina, D&Dss Gloucester) which is why she asked Princess Alexandra of Kent to help.

Demand has not diminished.
Was Princess Mary not a working royal until her death in 1965? She was only 67 at the time.
__________________
Virtually Royalty
Reply With Quote
  #2213  
Old 11-09-2015, 10:05 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 595
Although I do think QE2 & DoE and QEQM working into their 90's + is a great thing, and working for them, it has placed some pretty substantial expectations on the rest of the family. Most people in the US have retired by PoW's age, his parent's schedule is unheard of completely. I think the duration of his reign will be closer to that of his grandfather's than his great-grandfather.
Reply With Quote
  #2214  
Old 11-10-2015, 12:43 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 407
I really hope that when the Queen celebrates her 90th birthday next year, that people will fully appreciate what a burden she has to carry. At the same time, the five young HRH royals, for varying reasons, do next to nothing on the royal front. Many say that the minor royals such as the Queen's cousins shouldn't be needee at all, but the reality is there is noone to take their place. Even when the reigning couple pass away, there will be a real difficulty in keeping up the current number of engagements.
Reply With Quote
  #2215  
Old 11-10-2015, 01:27 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 18,409
When The Queen and Philip pass William will be heir to the throne and therefore has very little if no excuse not to become a full time Royal and I expect he and his family understand this. That's why The Queen is giving him "this time" to be a "normal" family, exactly like she had before her father became King.

If needed at this present time all five young HRH's would step up to the plate. But The Queen has decided to leave them be for now.

Whilst I will always advocate to see more of any of our royal family, as exposure is what they need. I do not begrudge William time to watch his children grow.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #2216  
Old 11-10-2015, 04:21 PM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,063
I must confess that I am a bit eager and curious to see the monarchy under Charles... I know that this is a conflicting thought, as it would mean that HM is no longer with us, but I would like to see what a new king would bring and all the inevitable changes that would come with his accession.... I think I would like to witness a new reing after the long one of queen Elizabeth... I both fear and welcome that moment!
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
Reply With Quote
  #2217  
Old 11-10-2015, 05:02 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 2,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
When The Queen and Philip pass William will be heir to the throne and therefore has very little if no excuse not to become a full time Royal and I expect he and his family understand this. That's why The Queen is giving him "this time" to be a "normal" family, exactly like she had before her father became King.

If needed at this present time all five young HRH's would step up to the plate. But The Queen has decided to leave them be for now.

Whilst I will always advocate to see more of any of our royal family, as exposure is what they need. I do not begrudge William time to watch his children grow.
I fully agree with you. The Queen is in control of who does what when it comes to royal engagements. Very few will question the monarchy as long as Queen EII is active but the republicans will be more vocal once she is gone. She will be active and visible until her last breath. As far as the royal children and grandchildren's royal engagements I would expect that she and Prince Charles have had many talks about the issue. He will after all inherit whatever royal commitments and sponsorships are in place when he becomes the King. The question is whether there needs to be so many royals attending so many openings, ribbon cuttings, anniversarys and so on. It appears that has grown to big business under QEII by involving her cousins and other relatives in addition to her close family. Prince Charles may have other ideas regarding the family involvement when he is in charge.
Reply With Quote
  #2218  
Old 11-10-2015, 06:37 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 407
Regarding the BRF being slimmed down under Charles, is there actual proof that other European royal families have downsized, ot is it just perceived this way because of the number of monarchs who have abdicated, shifting the focus to the new nuclear family, while the number of HRHs (or equivalent) in these families still exists.
Reply With Quote
  #2219  
Old 11-10-2015, 08:08 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,560
I don't think many European RF's have deliberately 'slimmed down', look at the Dutch RF they have just as many HRH or HH titled people. The big difference there is that they have created a separate entity- THE Royal House - which is different from the royal family and only members of the Royal House work full time on royal duties (i think).
I think the difference in other European RFs is that most current monarchs have had sisters rather than brothers as siblings (Juan Carlos x2 sisters, Harold of Norway x2 sisters, Margrethe of Denmark x2 sisters, Carl Gustafe of Sweden x 4 sisters, Beatrix of Netherlands x 3 sisters, Elizabeth of UK x 1 sister) and under many royal family's old rules women lost their royal status when they married (or at least when they married 'below' royal status).
If there has been more brothers we might have bigger royal families in much of Europe as mainly royal/HRH status is passed down through males.

I think if/when the Kent's and Gloucesters stop doing royal duties Charles (possibly William) will have to decide whether to 'replace' them as such or whether to have less working royals. I often hear people say these royals do so much, and of course they do carry out 100s of duties each year but that alone doesn't mean Charles would decide to 'replace' them. HE may choose to have a much smaller RF doing much less. Because they simply don't have the royals to do it many European RFs don't have 11+ working royals all doing duties. Its down to Charles to decide what he wants the RF to do.
Reply With Quote
  #2220  
Old 11-10-2015, 08:28 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,734
In terms of members performing public engagements I think the Spanish Royal family have the least. There is just the King, Queen and the ex King and Queen now. The two young Infantas won't be doing Royal duties for a decade or more probably and Felipe's sisters are no longer taking them on.

Yes, they seem to manage perfectly well, but it seems to me that most European Royal houses have about six or seven people to call on for Royal engagements and that appears to be enough.

The Duke of Kent is not a particularly well man and his Duchess has withdrawn from Royal life. Princess Alexandra is not very well either and I can see retirement from active Royal duties for them all within the next year or two. It will be the same for Prince Philip.

As the ranks drop out then the young royals will have to take over patronages and charities. I can't see the Yorkies doing this, but the Cambridges and Harry and his wife when he gets one will certainly be performing many more Royal duties than they do now, and this will multiply when Charles comes to the throne. The numbers, if Charles's siblings continue, will still be larger than those of most Royal houses.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british, camilla, charles iii, charles of wales, coronation, crown jewels, duchess of cornwall, legacy, prince charles, prince of wales, queen camilla, titles, william v


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Monarchy after Elizabeth II ysbel British Royals 515 09-28-2017 10:22 PM
Monarchy vs Republic marian Royalty Past, Present, and Future 393 08-14-2017 06:32 AM
The Monarchy in Greece Fireweaver The Royal Family of Greece 309 10-31-2016 06:54 PM
The Monarchy And The Media Alexandria Royal House of Norway 12 04-08-2004 05:06 PM




Popular Tags
best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill countess of snowdon crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark dutch state visit earl of snowdon fascism fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta margarita infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín juan urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news nobel 2017 paris picture of the week prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queenmother queen rania queen rania in australia queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises