The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #501  
Old 09-28-2017, 01:27 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 635
I am just going to throw a question out to get opinions on this.....If Charles slims down the monarchy and even William does more in the way of slimming down the monarchy do you think that the people will see less of them and then begin to think why do we even have a monarchy for they don't really do much? IMO I see that each time HM or Charles or William is out there among the people it reinforces the idea and institution of the monarchy itself. It is a way of them being seen as the head of the monarchy that keeps the country together in peace and times of war if there is another. Thanks for ideas on this and for me personally, I want the monarchy to continue for centuries on.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 09-28-2017, 01:44 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,047
As long as the monarch, the heir and the adult heir's heir as seen they will be fine. How many people really care about the other members of the family turning up anyway?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 09-28-2017, 01:51 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
As long as the monarch, the heir and the adult heir's heir as seen they will be fine. How many people really care about the other members of the family turning up anyway?
Apparently enough people care that organizations are happy to have a "minor royal" attend their event or opening or whatever. If they didn't no one would bother having The Duchess of Gloucester as a patron or have her come to things in an official capacity.
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 09-28-2017, 02:11 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 635


I completely agree you for there are lots of events all over the country where the monarch is wanted and so are members of the family. It is not just about the monarch and the heir, it is the very institution and all members of that. As HM has said, and if I get this wrong please correct me, *She has to be seen to believed*......the monarchy in it's entirety as a whole has to be out there in all parts of the kingdom, not just a few places. If they hid behind the walls of the palace so to speak then people will wonder why are we paying for this, why do we need them, they cost to much money and so forth. Prince Edward and his wife are not major players yet people do show up to see them for they are representing the monarch and that is what people want to see. The younger generation today might not view this as something they want yet believe me as one gets older views change big time and a country's history becomes more important and if a person younger sees a member of the monarch at some event then they will remember that always and be more in tune to what is going on with the monarch as time goes by.

The monarch will only survive as long as the people want it and to survive they have to be out there working all the time to represent all the people, if not then the republicans will jump to get rid of them.
Reply With Quote
  #505  
Old 09-28-2017, 12:44 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,452
One thing I sincerely hope is that when it comes time for a coronation, Charles will keep as much of the pomp and pageantry and the traditions of a British coronation that he possibly can. His coronation will not be only his but a day for all the people of the UK and the Commonwealth. It means something special.

The monarchy stands for continuity. The monarchy is the preservation of who the British people are, where they come from, where they've been and is a secure lifeline going into the future. The monarchy is the glue that holds everything together for the UK and the Commonwealth.

To do anything less, to me, would be stripping meaning from the monarchy itself.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #506  
Old 09-28-2017, 12:54 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
As long as the monarch, the heir and the adult heir's heir as seen they will be fine. How many people really care about the other members of the family turning up anyway?
Well, they are plenty of people who care about a Royal like Harry turning up to things like the Invictus Games, as we've seen from the fulsome praise the wounded and maimed athletes have given for his appearances and work this week.
Reply With Quote
  #507  
Old 09-28-2017, 02:25 PM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 541
I think the most profound change after Elizabeth II will be states opting not to have the British monarch be their head of state. I think this will be more a reflection of the times than a reflection on Elizabeth II's successors.

Interestingly, going by Brexit, decoupling actually created more work for the royals not less, as the Foreign Office is utilizing the royals as part of the effort to keep financial ties with European countries. It remains to be seen if this is a short-term or long-term phenomenon.


To me solid arguments can be made for a small royal family (monarch, heir and spouses) as well as a larger royal family (monarch, heirs, spares and whatnot). As I have mentioned before, if the small royal family model prevails, then I predict that there will be challenges to the funding scheme and it will interesting to see how the Windsors respond to that challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #508  
Old 09-28-2017, 02:59 PM
Princess Squirrel's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 59
Future

I think that, with the exception of the 'top' royals (monarch, heir etc), it should be up to individual members of the family whether they want to be full time 'firm' members. To take an example from Sweden, Princess Madeline's husband could have been given the title of Prince if he'd wanted it, but he chose to opt out and continue his career. Obviously in a historical context it has usually been the case that wives of male royals have joined the Firm but husbands of female royals have not. For example Mark Phillips, who I'm sure the Queen would have been happy to grant a title to. But it doesn't have to be the case.

If there turned out to be a lack of available royals using this method, then of course it wouldn't work. But I think we'll always have a mixture of spouses who do and don't want to join.

I personally don't favour Charles' slimmed- down monarchy. I also think it's a pity the York princesses aren't allowed to play a role in the BRF if they want to. As has been said, many members are getting on quite a bit, Prince Andrew will be 60 in 2020 and has no wife to help in royal duties. It will be years before the Cambridge children can take on royal duties. That leaves the Wessex couple, William and Catherine, Harry and Meghan (probably... his wife anyway) who are anything like young. Could be a problem in 20 years or less given the age at which Charles is likely to come to the throne, and the Duchess of Cornwall is more or less the same age as he is.
Reply With Quote
  #509  
Old 09-28-2017, 07:12 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Claude View Post
I think the most profound change after Elizabeth II will be states opting not to have the British monarch be their head of state. I think this will be more a reflection of the times than a reflection on Elizabeth II's successors.
When Elizabeth became Queen she was Head of State of about 50 countries while now it is 16 and could easily drop a few more before she dies. Most of them are in the caribbean as those in Africa, Asia and Europe have become republics.

This is an ongoing process and whether there are any left when Elizabeth dies, other than Britain, will depend largely on how much longer she lives.

Quote:
Interestingly, going by Brexit, decoupling actually created more work for the royals not less, as the Foreign Office is utilizing the royals as part of the effort to keep financial ties with European countries. It remains to be seen if this is a short-term or long-term phenomenon.
It is perfectly normal for royals to make a number of tours to Europe each year. The only difference this year is that William and Kate visited Germany and Poland.

Most royals don't get any coverage when they do overseas, or even local visits, so it seems like something has changed but when you go back and look at the CC it is obvious that it isn't.


Quote:
To me solid arguments can be made for a small royal family (monarch, heir and spouses) as well as a larger royal family (monarch, heirs, spares and whatnot). As I have mentioned before, if the small royal family model prevails, then I predict that there will be challenges to the funding scheme and it will interesting to see how the Windsors respond to that challenge.
The only change would be in the size of the Sovereign Grant. The Duchies are set up differently and unless there is a move to strip the monarch and heir of a private income to use to support themselves and the extended family then all they can do is reduce the percentage paid for the Sovereign Grant and the argument could easily be put that it needs to remain at 15% to fund those it funds for their official engagements and to maintain the royal palaces - putting more into that rather than the ongoing cuts that have seen the massive figure that has to be paid now.
Reply With Quote
  #510  
Old 09-28-2017, 07:21 PM
Princess Squirrel's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 59
Cc?

What is CC please?
Reply With Quote
  #511  
Old 09-28-2017, 07:29 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Squirrel View Post
What is CC please?
Court Circular? its the listing of the official engagements and events done by the monarchy.

Our own Iluvbertie keeps an extensive lists of these things taken from the court circular which can be found at British Royal Family Engagements 2017. Makes for interesting reading.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #512  
Old 09-28-2017, 07:34 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,767
Court Circular. It is the daily record of all engagements by individual members of the BRF and is signed off by the Queen. (Births, Weddings, Christenings, Deaths/ Funerals are also recorded.) Engagements not recorded in the CC are regarded as unofficial.
The CC appears in newsprint in The Times, and ostensibly on the official online site, but the latter is absolutely shockingly inefficient.
Reply With Quote
  #513  
Old 09-28-2017, 07:54 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 5,077
And the kicker is that The Times requires a subscription to view the CC. Which I understand from a business perspective, but it would be so easy to set that one Times page so that the public could read the CC. As a "for the common good" gesture.

But it's The Times, so don't hold you breath on that.

And I am off topic, sorry Mods.
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
Reply With Quote
  #514  
Old 09-28-2017, 10:00 PM
Lisele's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Columbia, United States
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS View Post
And the kicker is that The Times requires a subscription to view the CC. Which I understand from a business perspective, but it would be so easy to set that one Times page so that the public could read the CC. As a "for the common good" gesture.

But it's The Times, so don't hold you breath on that.

And I am off topic, sorry Mods.
The only Court Circular I go to is the official one at The British Monarchy site
https://www.royal.uk/court-circular

It's free :)
Reply With Quote
  #515  
Old 09-28-2017, 10:05 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,047
The problem with the online CC is that it is quite irregular in updating.

When I put up the update to 28th September later today I will have a list of 'missing dates' and id a number of those dates on which we know royals undertook engagements but can't know exactly what because the online CC doesn't keep up to date.

For example - the 22nd and 23rd September have no official engagements listed - that includes the opening of the IG for Harry and the engagements Andrew did in Brisbane (sorry Qlders - for you the visit of the Queen's second son warranted by received by the Governor and a church service and a visit to an art gallery but what he did on the other days - for Pitch at Palace doesn't rate - for the rest of us eastern staters this 'whirlwind' nearly two week tour rates even if the event wasn't in the capital city).
Reply With Quote
  #516  
Old 09-28-2017, 10:22 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tennessee, United States
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by M. Payton View Post


As HM has said, and if I get this wrong please correct me, *She has to be seen to believed*......the monarchy in it's entirety as a whole has to be out there in all parts of the kingdom, not just a few places. If they hid behind the walls of the palace so to speak then people will wonder why are we paying for this, why do we need them, they cost to much money and so forth. Prince Edward and his wife are not major players yet people do show up to see them for they are representing the monarch and that is what people want to see. The younger generation today might not view this as something they want yet believe me as one gets older views change big time and a country's history becomes more important and if a person younger sees a member of the monarch at some event then they will remember that always and be more in tune to what is going on with the monarch as time goes by.
Being seen can take many forms, however, not only being seen in person at relatively small groundbreaking/ribboncutting/plaque unveiling events but in interviews, videos, etc. At the moment, I think a lot of younger folks respond quite favorably to seeing members of their royal family in ways that feel intimate to their generation: on the smartphones that feel like an extension of themselves. It will be interesting to see if, as you predict, those tastes change over time as they age...or if the manner in it is most effective and useful for Charles, William and George to "be seen" will be what changes.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
future of the monarchy


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Future of the Spanish Monarchy TODOI Royal Family of Spain 1342 Today 01:19 PM
Prince Albert, Duke of York and Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon - 1923 Mandy Historical Royal Weddings 36 04-08-2016 03:45 AM
The Mechanics of Abdication and of Succession to the Throne Ellie2 British Royals 212 12-29-2015 11:18 AM
Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip's Visit to The Netherlands: February 5, 2007 Empress Dutch Royals 54 02-08-2007 03:04 AM
Relationship between King Juan Carlos and Queen Elizabeth Conde Valleverde King Juan Carlos and Queen Sofia 4 11-12-2004 09:54 PM




Popular Tags
baptism best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events david armstrong-jones denmark duchess of cambridge gala dress earl of snowdon fascism general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy nazi news pablo urdangarín picture of the week portugal prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess alexandra of luxembourg princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia gowns queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queenmother queen rania queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises