the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2008, 10:59 PM
LadyCat's Avatar
LadyCat LadyCat is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: WM, United States
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceflower View Post
The Duchess of Gloucester visits the Royal Academy of Music
on December 13, 2007 in London, England. Secchi/Scoopt/Getty

You can see more pics of the event at the Queen's current
events thread

-----> Pic
I wanna look like that when I GROW UP!

Last edited by LadyCat; 02-25-2008 at 11:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2007, 03:25 PM
PrincessofEurope's Avatar
PrincessofEurope PrincessofEurope is offline
Royal Highness
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,020
Default

i read today that the Duchess of Gloucester is thinking about attending the GB Davis Cup tie in Argentina between 8th and 10th Feb 08 and because of the existing tensions between the UK and Argentina and the fact that this will be the first time the two countries have meet together at any sporting event since the Falklands War in 1982 it is causing major security not only for the tennis players but also if a royal was to attend
it shows the duchesses great love to tennis
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2008, 05:03 PM
iceflower's Avatar
iceflower iceflower is offline
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative - Monaco and Sweden
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 8,172
Default Pics 8.2.2008

PrincessofEurope, here are the pics of that

Briain's Duchess of Gloucester watches the Davis Cup 1st round
match between David Nalbandian of Argentina and Jamie Baker
of Great Britain, in Parque Roca, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 08 Feb 08

** Pic 1 ** Pic 2 **
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2008, 05:40 PM
suztav suztav is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 159
Default

Does anyone know if Lord Culloden has been baptised? If yes, when and who were his godparents? Any pictures?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2008, 05:00 PM
iceflower's Avatar
iceflower iceflower is offline
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative - Monaco and Sweden
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 8,172
Default Pics 9.2.2008

The Duchess of Gloucester is seen courtside before the doubles
tie during the Davis Cup World Group match between Argentina
and Great Britain at the Parque Roca Stadium on February 9,
2008 in Buenos Aires, Argentina:

** Pic 1 ** Pic 2 **
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2008, 05:08 PM
sirhon11234's Avatar
sirhon11234 sirhon11234 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 1,755
Default

Wow, the Duchess looks great and young. :)
__________________
Diana, Princess of Wales - She became an icon in life and a
legend in death.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2008, 05:46 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,660
Default

Nobody. They won't be replaced and the Royal Family will slim down and end this idea of minor royals which most of the public have a problem with.
__________________
Lovely stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2008, 06:22 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Mermaid1962 Mermaid1962 is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 2,209
Default

I can see that as being a problem in the future, though, because it means that there'll be a lot less Royal patronage and visitation. That means that fewer and fewer volunteer and charitable organizations will get publicity and Royal encouragement for what they do. The monarchy will be seen as less and less relevant if the Royal Family aren't as involved in the day-to-day workings of the nation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan View Post
Nobody. They won't be replaced and the Royal Family will slim down and end this idea of minor royals which most of the public have a problem with.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2008, 08:54 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mount Chewster, United States
Posts: 5,531
Default

I could not agree more, Mermaid. It is what I have been saying and believing for a long time. I think the loss of the Gloucesters will be a big, unfortunate loss for the monarchy. A slimmed down royal family will just mean more work for less people. It's like companies cutting manpower in the interest of paying less. It makes it harder for the few who remain.
__________________
My twitter page
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-25-2008, 09:08 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,660
Default

We'll happily keep them if you'll send a cheque...
__________________
Lovely stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-25-2008, 09:18 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 613
Default

Right, Beatrix Fan, the ribbon cutters cost money.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:25 AM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mount Chewster, United States
Posts: 5,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS View Post
Right, Beatrix Fan, the ribbon cutters cost money.
Everything costs money, though, countess. If you don't have royals cutting ribbons, then you have mayors doing it instead. you would have to pay them just as well, so either way, you're paying for someone to do the job.
l like how the Gloucesters do their job anyway. They do it well, and probably are underpaid for it, so.........
__________________
My twitter page
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2008, 06:07 PM
iceflower's Avatar
iceflower iceflower is offline
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative - Monaco and Sweden
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , Germany
Posts: 8,172
Default Pic 12.03.2008

HRH Duke of Gloucester and HRH Duchess of Gloucester attending
the opening night performance of New York City Ballet at the London
Coliseum, 12/03/2008.

----> Pic
__________________
**** Welcome aboard! ****
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2008, 05:40 AM
Polly's Avatar
Polly Polly is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mebourne, Australia
Posts: 460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan View Post
We'll happily keep them if you'll send a cheque...
Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, is a good, kind, hard-working man whose dedication to altruistic public service is unquestionable.

Prince Richard, Duke of Glouceter, does everything in his remit to save his cousin, Her Majesty, unnecessary grief and strife and tedious work.

Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, is a kind, tolerant, and understanding and loving father.

Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, is an adornment to the British Royal Family and credit to his nation.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-25-2008, 09:37 PM
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 17,183
Default

It seems as though celebrities are in higher demand than royals for a lot of social occasions these days. So, between the lower demand for royals and the fact that a lot of the current crop of young royals don't seem to want to have much to do with royal life, it's quite possible that the royal family will slim down again to include just the monarch and his/her immediate family, who will basically do constitutional and ceremonial stuff. The Gloucesters are a wonderful example of a couple who have put their public duties first even though by all accounts they would have preferred a more private life. Unfortunately that commitment seems to be somewhat lacking in the current generation of minor royals.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-25-2008, 10:23 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 613
Default

I just think the whole "royal" thing has outlived it time. Times change. The Gloucester's have handled themselves with dignity and aplomb. Today's generation are no longer impressed with this and that title, my personal opinion. Especially, if the people with these titles bring little to the table. Not that some of the "stars" the younger generation admire, bring anything to the table. But, I digress. I think, the general public, are not excited about families, that they have discovered, are really no different than their own. Just with a whole lot more money and privilege. When the present queen passes, again, my opinion, things will change greatly. The respect that Elizabeth garners in vast amounts, will be gone.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:30 AM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Mermaid1962 Mermaid1962 is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 2,209
Default

There's more to monarchy than royal celebrity. The fact remains that many of the world's most stable countries are constitutional monarchies. When I see how many of the republics in the word fare and compare them with the constitutional monarchies, I think I'll keep my monarchy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS View Post
I just think the whole "royal" thing has outlived it time. Times change. The Gloucester's have handled themselves with dignity and aplomb. Today's generation are no longer impressed with this and that title, my personal opinion. Especially, if the people with these titles bring little to the table. Not that some of the "stars" the younger generation admire, bring anything to the table. But, I digress. I think, the general public, are not excited about families, that they have discovered, are really no different than their own. Just with a whole lot more money and privilege. When the present queen passes, again, my opinion, things will change greatly. The respect that Elizabeth garners in vast amounts, will be gone.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:20 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew andrew is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arad, Romania
Posts: 144
Default .

I think that when Charles becomes king, and it may be in 10 or even more years, the Gloucester will be nearly 80, the Kents over 80, Princess Anne around 70, the duke of York nearly 70. So only Prince Edward and his wife will be relatively young. My opinion is that the York princesses and prince Harry should gather themselves, get more mature and have a more positive contribution to the Royal Family.
They somehow represent the quintessence of Britishness, of tradition of power so they should be their to support charity, arts and all kind of manifestation that bring smth. to the UK.
Anyway, they have to become more responsable and more aware of their role. I hope that it will happen in the near-future.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:21 PM
andrew's Avatar
andrew andrew is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arad, Romania
Posts: 144
Default .

Sorry, I've mistyped
"should be their to support charity" it's: should be there
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-26-2008, 05:02 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Mermaid1962 Mermaid1962 is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 2,209
Default

I agree. Beatrice and Eugenie still have to get their education. But after that, it would be nice to see them active on the Royal scene--and not just for the glamorous occasions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew View Post
I think that when Charles becomes king, and it may be in 10 or even more years, the Gloucester will be nearly 80, the Kents over 80, Princess Anne around 70, the duke of York nearly 70. So only Prince Edward and his wife will be relatively young. My opinion is that the York princesses and prince Harry should gather themselves, get more mature and have a more positive contribution to the Royal Family.
They somehow represent the quintessence of Britishness, of tradition of power so they should be their to support charity, arts and all kind of manifestation that bring smth. to the UK.
Anyway, they have to become more responsable and more aware of their role. I hope that it will happen in the near-future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
duchess of gloucester, duke of gloucester


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Duke and Duchess of Windsor (1894-1972) and (1895-1986) Jacqueline British Royals 512 Yesterday 03:46 PM
Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester (1900-1974) and Princess Alice (1901-2004) Catharine British Royals 113 10-10-2009 10:27 PM
Duke and Duchess of Calabria and Family 1: June 2003-May 2008 mybags Italian Royalty 177 06-02-2008 07:35 AM
The Duke And Duchess Of Gloucester: Oct 03-Jan 06 A.C.C. Current Events Archive 132 01-13-2006 10:37 PM
Grand Duke Henri & Grand Duchess Maria Teresa, Current Events 2 (Sep 2003 - Aug 2005) Fireweaver Grand Duke Henri and Grand Duchess Maria Teresa 233 08-28-2005 01:00 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 AM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0