Originally Posted by wartenberg7
So, this "expert" about the consultation of Commonwealth-country-governments about the "Queen-title" concerning the Dss o Cornwall was wrong?
I wouldn't say that they're wrong, but I also wouldn't say that they're right.
There is an assumption that when you have a King who is in a non-morganatic marriage then his wife is a Queen. Therefore, it could be assumed that when Charles is King of New Zealand, for example, his wife will be Queen of New Zealand. This is an assumption, though, as there isn't any established precedent within the realms. There hasn't been a "King of New Zealand" before though; prior to HM's reign, the monarch didn't use individual titles in each of the realms.
If the Realms decide that they wish to recognize the king's consort with a title then it won't be as easy as people think for Camilla to be Princess Consort (and even if they don't, it isn't an easy thing even just in Britain).
Camilla's future titles in the realms are not comparable to her current titles or to the titles of other royals (othe than HM), including the DoE, in the realms though. The Realms only grant titles to the monarch and possibly the wife of the monarch. They recognize other British titles by courtesy and may consider members of the BRF to also be members of their own royal family (or they may not). The DoE's titles now are not automatic titles granted to the consort of a Queen, they're titles that were granted to him specifically.