The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #681  
Old 06-28-2013, 05:35 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
I would prefer to see the government establish a 'Department of the Head of State' to handle the money matters of the monarch and then it would be clear that The Queen doesn't get paid a salary to do her job.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #682  
Old 06-28-2013, 09:39 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I would prefer to see the government establish a 'Department of the Head of State' to handle the money matters of the monarch and then it would be clear that The Queen doesn't get paid a salary to do her job.
I somewhat understands that the Queen doesn't get paid by the government. Instead the income from the Crown Estate goes to pay for the expenses of being head of state. Does this include travel cost, palace maintenance (of Buck, Clarence, Kensington, Windsor), household costs (like the staff), and entertainment costs (such as state visits, garden parties, and other events). So the Queen doesn't get any money from the civil list/sovereign grant as a salary for being the head of state?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #683  
Old 06-28-2013, 11:10 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 7,404
Prince Charles paid £1m a year to support Prince William and Harry in official duties:
Prince Charles paid £1m a year to support Prince William and Harry in official duties | Royal | News | Daily Express
__________________
"If you are always trying to be normal you will never know how amazing you can be."

Dr. Maya Angelou
Reply With Quote
  #684  
Old 06-29-2013, 01:50 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto (ON) & London (UK), Canada
Posts: 5,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShannyD View Post
...So the Queen doesn't get any money from the civil list/sovereign grant as a salary for being the head of state?
Correct, there is no salary for being head of state. The old Civil List and now the 15% from the Crown Estate are meant to cover the official expenses of the head of state but not the personal expenses and all expenses must be accounted for.
The Queens private income is from the Duchy of Lancaster which she may use as she sees fit.
.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #685  
Old 06-29-2013, 04:03 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
That is correct - but unfortunately many people don't understand this and think the money she gets is hers for her own amusement when it is to cover the costs of being Head of State. If Britain became a republic they would still have these costs for their Head of State and the excuse that the palaces would be open more often doesn't hold up when you realise that a President would still need a place to live.
.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #686  
Old 06-29-2013, 04:16 AM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,664
Duchy of Lancaster/Cornwall



If Britain became a republic - would the capital/income/assets of the 2 Duchies revert to the State or be granted to the "retiring" royal family?

I apprecaite that there may not be a definitive answer, so informed views would be helpful.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #687  
Old 06-29-2013, 04:29 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
I would assume that the Duchy of Lancaster estate would become the private income of the new President, in lieu of a salary and the Duchy of Cornwall the income of the Vice-President - or something along those lines. Of course it could revert to the state. The private property of the royals - e.g. Balmoral and Sandringham would remain the property of the royals.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #688  
Old 06-29-2013, 04:35 AM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,664
I would have thought that the president/vice president (bearing in mind they are non-political heads of state) would get a salary and the state would be responsible for maintaining the buildings used.

I think that the state would grab the Duchies.

Obviously the Queen has other income, over and above Duchy and Sovereign Grant. Any idea how much it is?
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #689  
Old 06-29-2013, 06:56 AM
vkrish's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I would prefer to see the government establish a 'Department of the Head of State' to handle the money matters of the monarch and then it would be clear that The Queen doesn't get paid a salary to do her job.
Iluvbertie, how much ever is done, is not good enough for people to understand the truth. They have fixed RF as a cushion to vent out their frustations. BTW this "HoS Department" will only make matters worse, like IHA of Japan, increasing beauracratic interference in the RF..
__________________
The only word I hate in the Royal Dictionary - ABDICATION
Reply With Quote
  #690  
Old 06-29-2013, 08:13 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
It would separate the money from the RF however and make it clearer that in fact the British people get a very good deal - no salary to their Head of State but all the other benefits - they have a Head of State who is self-supporting which, if a republic, they won't have.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #691  
Old 06-29-2013, 08:47 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Springfield, United States
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
That would be accurate reporting, and newspapers don't do that over her.
They don't do that in the U.S. either
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #692  
Old 06-29-2013, 08:57 AM
padams2359's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 388
The British people could never find a president so committed to the people or that has the global popularity to generate the income of the Queen and the Royal Family.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #693  
Old 06-29-2013, 10:19 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 356
They also fail to mention that the civil list amount was static for about 20 years. I doubt very much that could be said for many other government departments.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #694  
Old 06-29-2013, 08:22 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
The payments now are, in relative terms, much lower than they were in 1980 as there was a complete hold no any rises for most of Labour's time in power and it had been eroding in real terms before that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #695  
Old 06-30-2013, 05:32 PM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,427
The current discussion concerning the backgrounds and financial circumstances of US Presidents past and present is of no relevance, or interest, and has therefore been removed.

Warren
British Forums moderator
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Reply With Quote
  #696  
Old 07-08-2013, 05:56 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Balmoral, United Kingdom
Posts: 285
To those who are unfamiliar with the Royal family, the finances must be somewhat confusing.
__________________
Virtually Royalty
Reply With Quote
  #697  
Old 07-11-2013, 05:31 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westmeath, Ireland
Posts: 9,788
Prince Charles’s representative to be questioned by MPs

Prince Charles’s representative to be questioned by MPs
__________________
December 5th,2014 -Death of H.M.Queen Fabiola of Belgium
Reply With Quote
  #698  
Old 07-11-2013, 07:28 AM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 759
Does anyone know when Prince Charles began receiving the income from the Duchy?

Who was receiving it while he was still a minor or until the age he started receiving it?

Thanks
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #699  
Old 07-11-2013, 07:36 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,199
The Duchy of Cornwall would have been earning money before Charles turned 18, however he wouldn't have accessed it like he does today. How the money was put to use would either have been down to a manager or The Queen. It would have been controlled like it was when there was no Duke of Cornwall when Elizabeth was heir.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #700  
Old 07-11-2013, 06:36 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 8,718
The income from the Duchy was put aside from the day he became Duke until he turned 18 - some was used, I believe, for his education but mainly it just accumulated.

He took control of it when he was 18. His parents were in charge of it before that.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, civil list, finances


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Costs and Finances of the Belgian Royal Family Marengo Royal Family of Belgium 69 12-04-2014 08:44 PM
Wealth and Finances of the Spanish Royal Family hrhcp Royal Family of Spain 111 10-12-2014 05:39 PM
Royals and Wealth, Costs and Finances kcc Royal Life and Lifestyle 384 09-28-2012 02:27 AM
Wealth of The German Royal/Princely Houses kcc Royal Families of Germany and Austria 12 12-30-2007 04:35 AM




Popular Tags
belgium carl philip charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events engagement fashion germany grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta sofia jewellery jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia luxembourg nobility official visit olympics ottoman president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince daniel prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess madeleine princess margriet princess marilene princess mary princess mary fashion queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding winter olympics 2014



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]