 |
|

05-18-2009, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,977
|
|
|
I agree that there should be a measure of security, but I also firmly feel that they need to do something productive besides partying, traveling abroad, and having their cars stolen right out from under them.
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

05-20-2009, 10:40 AM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 5
|
|
|
I think the "minor royals" need protection. No matter how they are acting, party animals or working princes or princesses. The fact is, they are close relatives to the Chief of State, and its succesor(s). So, any threat to their integrity can put these persons in a weak position. Not a desirable scene for national symbols...
__________________
|

05-20-2009, 11:12 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,977
|
|
|
But, as national symbols do they not have some form of obligation? They do need protection, that is undisputed, but how much protection is the question.
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

05-21-2009, 04:35 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 6,225
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99
But, as national symbols do they not have some form of obligation? They do need protection, that is undisputed, but how much protection is the question.
|
and, of course, who ends up with the bill.
__________________
|

05-21-2009, 09:14 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,977
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Marmalade
and, of course, who ends up with the bill.
|
Exactly.
The Associated Press just ran a story on Britain's debt outlook and how it has been downraded from stable to negative. Now, I agree, the Princesses security detail has not plunged the country into their recession, but the public is going to begin looking at expendable expenditures and I would assume that the security detail for partying princesses is going to be one of the first Royal expenditures is closely looked at. I agree, they need security, but until they are higher profile royals, they do not need what they are currently getting. Unless Mummy and Daddy want to foot the bill.
__________________
Janet
"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
|

05-23-2009, 07:17 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 1,996
|
|
BBC NEWS | UK | Reporters 'paid way into Palace'
Buckingham Palace has said it is investigating allegations undercover reporters were given access to highly sensitive areas of the Palace.
Two reporters from the News of the World newspaper are said to have been waved inside, without security checks.
|

05-24-2009, 12:16 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 1,996
|
|
BBC NEWS | UK | Palace suspends 'tour' chauffeur
Buckingham Palace has suspended a chauffeur after undercover reporters claimed to have gained access to highly sensitive areas of the building.
|

05-24-2009, 02:18 PM
|
 |
Administrator Newsletter Editor
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 9,268
|
|
|
This is really serious and quite sad.
If there is a lack of security regardign the Queen and Buckingham Palace, can you imagine what could possibly happen if security is reduced for the royals as a whole?
Again, its Buckingham Palace and these reporters just walked in. No check of the bags, ID's, etc. NOTHING!
|

05-25-2009, 02:52 PM
|
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: -, Brazil
Posts: 150
|
|
|
Cops aren’t cool for young royals
CALLS for round-the-clock police protection for the Duke of York’s two daughters to be reduced amid growing concern about the escalating costs of royal security have met with support from a surprising quarter… the girls themselves.
Daily Express | Columnists :: Cops aren’t cool for young Royals
__________________
|

05-27-2009, 11:57 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,903
|
|
|
|

05-28-2009, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a city on the Great Silk Road, Kazakhstan
Posts: 3,942
|
|
|
It appears to me that royal security breaches are a favourite pastime of the British mass media outlets and private citizens. I find British perseverance to breach the royal security again and again peculiar. We do not hear about security breaches in other European royal houses often. One can do it once or twice, but more than a dozen incidents may bespeak incompetence on the part of the people in charge of the Royal security.
__________________
Perfection is "simplicity devoid of unnecessary elements".
|

05-30-2009, 10:43 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: *****, United States
Posts: 576
|
|
|
__________________
|

05-31-2009, 09:57 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,944
|
|
The Scotland Yard unit that protects the Queen and other members of the Royal family is to be bolstered by up to 150 armed protection officers to ease long hours of work and cut excessive overtime payments
Royal protection unit boosted by 150 extra armed protection officers - Telegraph
__________________
|

06-13-2009, 11:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,443
|
|
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|

09-22-2009, 10:02 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,944
|
|
It is a role that demands a highly specialist set of skills.
Police officers applying to join the elite royal protection squad must be highly trained in personal protection, willing to travel, work 12-hour shifts and be constantly on the alert for any hint of danger to the Queen and her heirs to the throne.
__________________
|

02-15-2010, 04:57 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,515
|
|
|
Should "minor" HRHs have royal security protection?
Just wanted to get people's views on whether some of the more "minor" HRHs (eg Princess Alexandra, the Kents, Gloucesters etc) should still have state funded royal security cover?
__________________
|

02-15-2010, 05:32 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 5,858
|
|
|
I was under the impression that they usually only had it when on official duties these days.
And yes I do think they should get it - even more so now - they are the cousins of the Queen and therefore a definite target, possibly more so than those directly descended.
Any terrorist group worth its salt knows that to go directly for the Queen, Charles, William or Harry (or any of the Queen's children or grandchildren) would loose them support amongst their own people but to attack the royals by going after one of her cousins would still show that they can reach that high but not upset so many people (like the IRA going after Mountbatten - Philip's uncle and thus the Queen's uncle by marriage - showed how high they were prepared to go without totally getting people offside by attacking the Queen directly.)
__________________
|

02-15-2010, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 1,996
|
|
|
If they're deemed to be in enough danger, I think so. But I think any person should be entitled to that if it's truly necessary for their protection.
|

02-15-2010, 12:10 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: a city on the Great Silk Road, Kazakhstan
Posts: 3,942
|
|

Much as I like the Kents to have security, I do not think that they are under immediate threat of physical attack/kidnapping/etc. Additionally,the current economic situation will not allow to justify security of the extended royal family funded by tax payers.
__________________
Perfection is "simplicity devoid of unnecessary elements".
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|