The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #521  
Old 10-19-2018, 12:05 AM
loonytick's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tennessee, United States
Posts: 598
It just occurred to me—by living (part of the time, when she’s in Britain, anyway) with Andrew still, Sarah does benefit from his protection detail and only needs paid security when out and about. I wonder if that is part of why they’ve chosen their unconventional living situation. I also wonder if the security already in place at Kensington and St. James are a reason why the Queen chose to allot Beatrice and Eugenie living quarters in those palace complexes, to simplify what they (or, rather, Andrew) need to arrange for in terms of private security.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #522  
Old 10-19-2018, 03:52 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 95
Why wasn’t Sarah offered protection if Diana was offered it after the divorce?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #523  
Old 10-19-2018, 03:55 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 12,020
Diana was the mother of the future King, Sarah wasn't.

That was why Diana was offered accommodation at KP and Sarah wasn't offered any for of accommodation and Diana received a 17 million pound settlement to Sarah's 3 million of which 2 was to go into trust funds for the girls effectively meaning Sarah was given a 1 million pound settlement.
Reply With Quote
  #524  
Old 12-05-2018, 02:31 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 95
I know this isn’t the case now but I was wondering why it used to be that the children of a son of a monarch used to receive 24/7 police protection but they never offered this to children of a daughter of a monarch?
Reply With Quote
  #525  
Old 12-05-2018, 02:33 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 4,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal_enthusiast View Post
I know this isn’t the case now but I was wondering why it used to be that the children of a son of a monarch used to receive 24/7 police protection but they never offered this to children of a daughter of a monarch?
I'm assuming it has the same to do with why children of a son of monarch has HRH, but children of a daughter of monarch do not. They were seen as of the paternal family.
Reply With Quote
  #526  
Old 12-12-2018, 07:48 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 95
If in the hypothetical scenario Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother had re-married would she have lost her police protection?
Reply With Quote
  #527  
Old 12-12-2018, 08:00 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal_enthusiast View Post
If in the hypothetical scenario Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother had re-married would she have lost her police protection?
Highly doubtful-she would still have been the mother of the Queen.
Reply With Quote
  #528  
Old 12-12-2018, 08:36 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in the U.K, United Kingdom
Posts: 95
Do you think her new Husband would have received police protection as well as he would be the stepfather of the Queen?
Reply With Quote
  #529  
Old 12-12-2018, 08:55 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 2,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal_enthusiast View Post
Do you think her new Husband would have received police protection as well as he would be the stepfather of the Queen?
I don't think so, unless the threat assessment showed it was necessary. I doubt it would be ongoing.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, gloucester, kent, kidnapping, minor hrh, royal security, security, terrorism


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Royal Family's Security Helen88 Royal House of Sweden 5 02-11-2005 07:59 PM




Popular Tags
aif australia baltic republics bonaparte book british royal family britishroyals camilla christian ix clothes current events dailyfail discussão documentary duchessofsussex duchess of sussex duke of sussex duke of york dutch royal family earl of wessex fashion felipe vi germany greece harry headship her children introduction iñaki urdangarín jack brooksbank juan carlos king king felipe and queen letizia current events king philippe letizia meghan markle modernization monaco northampton osborn porphyria prince aymeric prince charles prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince of belgium princess alexia princesses princess louise prince william queen mary of teck queen maxima quizz royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding sarah ferguson savoy saxony state visit surname swedish royal family titles uk styles tom bower wedding windsor castle windsor wedding wivies



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises