Iluvbertie
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2004
- Messages
- 14,459
- City
- Bathurst
- Country
- Australia
As the King controls the use of titles and he specifically said that Wallis was NOT to have an HRH it was legal because only the monarch can create legal titles and so the monarch is able to deny a person the right to use such a title.
As for the second question - I am not sure that he was after he became King as he was still a descendent of George II and all his descendents, except those from females who married into foreign royal houses (and thus the argument about the Farran Exemption) are covered. The Act of Abdication didn't, as far as my reading of it goes, exclude the requirement that he abide by all Acts of Parliament that preceded that Act of Abdication.
As for the second question - I am not sure that he was after he became King as he was still a descendent of George II and all his descendents, except those from females who married into foreign royal houses (and thus the argument about the Farran Exemption) are covered. The Act of Abdication didn't, as far as my reading of it goes, exclude the requirement that he abide by all Acts of Parliament that preceded that Act of Abdication.
Last edited by a moderator: