The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #961  
Old 12-03-2018, 09:22 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
I was thinking the same thing.
Kate must be disappointed to miss Christmas at Bucklebury this year, considering it is Louis' first.

Now she has to go to Sandringham in a show of solidarity??!

(I do think the Cambridges planned to spend Christmas with the Middletons, since Carole talked about how the children could decorate a tree in their own rooms).
They most likely will be making themselves over to grandpa and grandma Middleton’s house for the holidays. That’s how it is, hopping from house to house to eat and collect presents.
__________________

__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #962  
Old 12-03-2018, 05:18 PM
EllieCat's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 510
I feel sorry for the Royal Family. Every week in the NZ 'women's' magazines, they are on the cover, because of a so-called 'bitter feud' between, Camilla-Kate, or Meghan-Eugenie or... insert name here – and apparently the Princes are being 'torn apart' on a weekly basis (usually mondays when the magazines come out ) and are 'incandescent with rage'. Funnily enough, these 'bitter feuds' are only between the Wales, Sussexes, Cambridges and Yorks, seems like Princess Anne and Sophie Wessex are just minding their own business, not getting into 'feuds' with anyone. For some reason Zara and Mike also don't get dragged into these 'bitter feuds' – is it because they're private and have the werewithall to possibly fight back?

I think these magazines should be ashamed of themselves. It's lies, lies, lies every week. I refuse to buy this crap. I buy Hello which is generally good (and has good photos of more than just the core Royals).

IMO, the Royals are just like everyone else. Some will get on tremendously well, others less so, but as long as everyone is cordial and friendly – which I think they are judging by body language – then that's all that is needed. But niceness doesn't sell; only drama and intrigue, and all sold to the world by unnamed 'sources'. i get beyond frustrated when friends of mine, who don't 'know' the royal family as I do, believe these magazines and quote them to me as though they were the Gospel truth.

I need a teeth-grinding emoj!
__________________

  #963  
Old 12-03-2018, 05:52 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
What a shame they have gave in to the media if it’s true
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
I was thinking the same thing.
Kate must be disappointed to miss Christmas at Bucklebury this year, considering it is Louis' first.

Now she has to go to Sandringham in a show of solidarity??!

(I do think the Cambridges planned to spend Christmas with the Middletons, since Carole talked about how the children could decorate a tree in their own rooms).
I believe this was a story in the DM with no confirmation. Why is is being taken as the gospel truth?

I'll believe it only IF the Cambridges appear in Sandringham on Christmas Day.
  #964  
Old 12-03-2018, 06:22 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 9,054
I'm hoping they don't. This year is a big year for the Middletons with Catherine's third and, more importantly, Pippa's first baby. They deserve the chance to share the joy and not have to try and placate the poison pens of the media. The Sussex's are (hopefully) going to be happy spending time with Doria and the rest of the royal family.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
  #965  
Old 12-03-2018, 06:24 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 14,066
I'm going to go with my grandmother's wise advice. "Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear" although I do believe the pictures of walking to church at Sandringham are pretty credible. As long as everybody enjoys their holidays, that's what really matters.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #966  
Old 12-03-2018, 06:59 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,735
Victoria Murphy putting everything into perspective-
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/so...mpression=true
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #967  
Old 12-03-2018, 07:23 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
That is hands down the best article I have read in recent times! Pure common sense! But then again, when dealing with tabloids and money, common sense is never the focus and it is not so common! It is gossip that sells and is amplified for more drama!

Interesting twitter responses from ex-royal chef Darren McGrady as well!
https://mobile.twitter.com/DarrenMcG...48438535028737
https://mobile.twitter.com/DarrenMcG...42182885834754
  #968  
Old 12-03-2018, 07:24 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,000
This was surprisingly rational and fair. Go VA!
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
  #969  
Old 12-03-2018, 07:42 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington, D.C., United States
Posts: 396
It almost doesn't matter whether the stories true or not, because stories like this are entirely predictable. You can't have two "good" princesses in the same fairy tale, so Kate is (until further notice) going to be the "good" princess and Yoko...I mean, Meghan...is the "bad" princess. Doesn't matter what they actually do or think, because that's the storyline.
  #970  
Old 12-03-2018, 08:30 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalnel View Post
It almost doesn't matter whether the stories true or not, because stories like this are entirely predictable. You can't have two "good" princesses in the same fairy tale, so Kate is (until further notice) going to be the "good" princess and Yoko...I mean, Meghan...is the "bad" princess. Doesn't matter what they actually do or think, because that's the storyline.
You're calling her Yoko, in order to continue spreading hatred unnecessarily towards her. That is sad.
  #971  
Old 12-03-2018, 09:58 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Victoria Murphy putting everything into perspective-
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/so...mpression=true
Great perspective. And I agree with posters who point out that we can never really know what goes on behind palace walls. Even staff and courtiers are not privy to every private interaction, and if purported 'sources' overhear something, it could be misunderstood, overblown or taken completely out of context.

I agree with Murphy's assesment, and it's interesting that she says it was KP press office (not BP) who commented on one 'feud' story by saying, 'That never happened.' Murphy writes:
"One of the most illuminating moments for observers of the William-Kate-Harry-and-Meghan dynamic came when the foursome were carrying out their first official engagement together at the Royal Foundation Forum in February.

Host Tina Daheley asked them 'Do you ever have disagreements about things?' Cue laughter. Meghan looks down, Kate fiddles with her hair and William says: 'Oh yes' ... William says it himself—yes they do. Yes they have. Yet there they were, all four of them, sitting together on a stage, laughing together and working together.

'The last thing you disagreed on, how did you resolve it?' Daheley presses in an interview style that seems a lot bolder now than it did at the time. 'Is it resolved? We don’t know!' William said."


I would also add that all four royals, including Kate and Meghan seemed amused by the question, not uncomfortable. Harry laughed and said, 'We work things out. We're stuck with each other for life.'"

As a reminder, there were early summer references in the media to stories about Meghan hugging staff members. The revelation was published in a mild rebuking tone.

In any case, the fact remains, we are not on the inside and we never will be. The brothers are very private and will continue protecting their families and their privacy. Their wives are both smart and tough. I don't doubt mild tensions and/or misunderstandings may occur, but I'd be surprised at anything major. It seems to me Kate & Meghan know their respective roles and aren't at odds with each other. In fact, they likely inspire each other and are equally holding their own in this high profile family. It's even possible that the four have had a laugh or two or three over the reported 'rift' nonsense, complete with eyerolls and headshaking.
  #972  
Old 12-03-2018, 10:24 PM
Madame Verseau's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,511
They are getting the inlaws involved

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dai...-PR-blitz.html
  #973  
Old 12-03-2018, 10:26 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 14,066
All of this makes me realize just why the Cambridges and most likely the Sussexes are going to be households that have the minimum amount of staff working in their residences that they can possibly have. The less people that have access to their private lives, the better. Both women seem to enjoy the day to day domestic types of things such as cooking and gardening and I would imagine that (as has been stated somewhere before) the kitchen is the hub of the home.

They all seem to work together very nicely and that's something that will be a forefront of their royal lives for quite a while yet. They'll also have their own separate families with their own activities and thats how it should be.

Glad all the bizarre stuff finally is starting to end.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #974  
Old 12-03-2018, 11:21 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,938
Victoria Murphys article pretty much sums it. All families go through it, especially families in such close proximity to each This too shall pass when Harry and Meghan move to Windsor.
  #975  
Old 12-03-2018, 11:31 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,883
How do we know anything happened in the first place? And if there was something why would the Sussexes move to Windsor affect it? Imo we are likely to see the four of them together long before March when the baby is due and the move is on. Perhaps on Xmas Day, or before.
  #976  
Old 12-03-2018, 11:46 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,677
Well, there is the annual pre-Christmas gathering the Queen hosts at BP, isn't there? Is that still on for this year?
  #977  
Old 12-04-2018, 12:28 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 14,066
I'm sure it is. The only thing we'll see from that is the people arriving so I really doubt we'll see family interaction. Just couples arriving and maybe departing. There may also be pictures from the Diplomatic Reception but as that's a formal occasion, I doubt we'll actually see much interaction. Just a few posed pictures hopefully.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #978  
Old 12-04-2018, 12:52 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,677
This commentary by Victoria Arbiter also makes a ton of sense:

https://honey.nine.com.au/2018/12/03...e-relationship
  #979  
Old 12-04-2018, 02:11 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: central valley, United States
Posts: 1,096
This will be an interesting Christmas at Sandringham for there are 2 newly married ins - Meghan, who was invited last year, and Jack. I wonder if Eugenie will choose to celebrate with her new husband’s family or if she and Jack will be at Sandringham.
Just because the Cambridges have in the past alternated between Buckleberry and Sandringham doesn’t mean they will continue to do so going forward, perhaps Pippa’s inlaws, the Mathews, have plans which she’ll be a part of which could influence when the Cambridges arrive in Buckleberry. It might be easier to do as Camilla has done, Christmas with Charles and the royals and then an early exit for the holiday with her children and grandchildren.
  #980  
Old 12-04-2018, 02:12 AM
M. Payton's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 1,852


Thanks Maia Maia, that was a really good read. Now that is the kind of news articles that need to be out there to help stop this other crap that is being put out about both Duchesses. I for one do not believe there is any type of rift or whatever between the 2 ladies, or their husbands. Both William and Harry grew up with the media and know just how they operate, and Catherine after all these years surely knows the same and they will guide and help Meghan through this. I know Meghan is used to the media being in the entertainment world yet being a royal duchess is a whole different ball park for her.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico View Post
I mean, is it REALLY necessary to post each article/gossip from the Daily Mail about this alleged« feud » ? You’re just feeding the beast !
I don ‘t remember such outcry when the DM made the most outrageaous headlines about Charles, Camilla, William or Catherine. Some of these « articles » were not even posted on this forum, becaude EVERYONE knew it was pure nonsense.
It seems to me that some well intentioned fans of the duchess of Sussex are maybe a bit too overprotective and yes have to learn that Meghan has signed for that, the tabloîd press, by entering into the BRF. That’s part of the job.
And believe me this story is just an appetizer … many many more will come in the future.
So « keep calm and carry on » …
As I have said before this is the best comment regarding these threads I have read in a very long time........we all should take notice of each other's comments and be respectful to all here!
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
british royal family, princessanne, relationship, relationships, siblings


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relationships between the Members of the Danish Royal Family jellybeans Royal House of Denmark 328 10-02-2019 01:07 PM
Relationships between Members of the Spanish Royal Family kil Royal Family of Spain 1497 02-20-2019 08:17 PM
Relationships between members of the Princely Family michelle Princely Family of Monaco 324 08-11-2018 03:22 AM
Relationships Between Members of the Swedish Royal Family Grandduchess24 Royal House of Sweden 56 11-02-2015 02:32 PM
Relationships between members of the Norwegian royal family. Dennism Royal House of Norway 78 11-22-2012 08:04 AM




Popular Tags
administrator alqasimi aristocracy bavaria;house;chef;luitpold;ludwig belgian royal family chittagong countess of snowdon countess of wessex crown crown prince hussein crown prince hussein's future wife crown princess victoria current events cyprus danish history denmark duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex dutch history french revolution friendly city general news germany greece headship henry v house of bernadotte house of glucksburg house of grimaldi house of orange-nassau house of saxe-coburg and gotha jumma kiko king philippe lady louise mountbatten-windsor lithuania marriage mbs meghan markle monaco royal monarchist monarchy monogram naples nobel prize norwegian royal family official visit palaces potential areas prince charles prince harry princely family of monaco princess benedikte queen mathilde queen paola rania of jordan romanov family savoy saxony shakespeare south africa south korea spanish royal state visit sweden swedish history united kingdom usa valois


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019
Jelsoft Enterprises
×