the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals




Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181  
Old 08-08-2006, 11:23 AM
RoyalProtocol's Avatar
RoyalProtocol RoyalProtocol is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast, United Kingdom
Posts: 335
Default

A new Press release about new titles/patronages for the Royal Family

Buckingham Palace press releases

APPOINTMENT OF NEW ROYAL NAVY PATRONS
8 August 2006

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS ISSUED BY THE PRESS SECRETARY TO THE QUEEN

The Queen has been pleased to appoint new Royal Patrons of various Royal Navy Commands in recognition of the strong links between the Royal Navy and the Royal family.
The Prince of Wales
Commodore-in-Chief, Plymouth
Prince William
Commodore-in-Chief, Scotland
Commodore-in-Chief, Submarines
Prince Harry
Commodore-in-Chief, Small Ships and Diving
The Duchess of Cornwall
Commodore-in-Chief, Naval Medical Services
The Duke of York
Commodore-in-Chief, Fleet Air Arm
The Earl of Wessex
Commodore-in-Chief, Royal Fleet Auxiliary
The Princess Royal
Commodore-in-Chief, Portsmouth
Prince Michael of Kent
Commodore-in-Chief, Maritime Reserves
__________________
HM The Queen and HRH The Prince Philip,Duke of Edinburgh,
60 years of devoted service.
God Save The Queen!
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 08-08-2006, 11:26 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,433
Default

Yes!! At last, Camilla's a C-in-C.
__________________
Doing an Edith Piaf.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 08-08-2006, 12:38 PM
kimebear's Avatar
kimebear kimebear is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Albany, United States
Posts: 839
Default

Is this the first time that William and Harry are serving as patrons? Or just the first military ones?
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 08-08-2006, 01:16 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,433
Default

These are indeed their first honorary military appointments.
__________________
Doing an Edith Piaf.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 08-20-2006, 03:46 PM
Frothy Frothy is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Not Saying, United Kingdom
Posts: 320
Default

The earlier post about Majesty was not correct. Henry VIII was the first monarch to use it.
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 09-22-2006, 07:15 PM
sirhon11234's Avatar
sirhon11234 sirhon11234 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn, United States
Posts: 1,528
Default

I wanted too know if princess beatrice or her sister married what would their husbands titles be.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 09-22-2006, 07:17 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,433
Default

Well, unless their husbands were offered peerages, nothing. They remain Mr and Beatrice and Eugenie become Mrs whatever after their Princess title. For example, Angus Ogilvy got nothing when he married Princess Alexandra so she became;

HRH Princess Alexandra of Kent, The Hon Mrs Ogilvy.

If Beatrice married Mr Holmes, she'd become;

HRH Princess Beatrice of York, Mrs Holmes
__________________
Doing an Edith Piaf.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 09-22-2006, 08:19 PM
Next Star's Avatar
Next Star Next Star is online now
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 631
Default

That is true in some european countries the title of duke does outrank the title of prince. And also The title of Princess Royal is a title of honor it is not a hereditary title you only recieve the title upon the monarch creating the title for you.
__________________
Take time to think before you do.
Princess Kamorrisa de St.Cogo,Duchess van Coth Ind Savoy
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 09-22-2006, 08:20 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,433
Default

Well, in Britain, the Dukedom doesn't outrank the Prince/Princess title, it gets an equal precedence and the Royal Family take their precedence based on their Prince/Princess rather than their Duke/Duchess Earl/Countess etc.
__________________
Doing an Edith Piaf.
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 09-24-2006, 11:48 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,985
Default

I have removed quite a few posts regarding European/German titles.
Could we please confine the discussion to British titles.
While other titles may be interesting, they aren't relevant to the British Royal Family.

thanks,
Warren
British Forums moderator
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups

Last edited by Warren; 09-25-2006 at 04:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 09-27-2006, 09:35 PM
Next Star's Avatar
Next Star Next Star is online now
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 631
Default

I know that in Britain the title of Duke does not outrank the title of Prince. The meaning of prince means first while the meaning of duke means leader.
__________________
Take time to think before you do.
Princess Kamorrisa de St.Cogo,Duchess van Coth Ind Savoy
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 09-27-2006, 11:02 PM
Empress's Avatar
Empress Empress is offline
Administrator
Picture of the Month Advisor
Book Club Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ridgefield, United States
Posts: 2,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
Well, in Britain, the Dukedom doesn't outrank the Prince/Princess title, it gets an equal precedence and the Royal Family take their precedence based on their Prince/Princess rather than their Duke/Duchess Earl/Countess etc.
Well, I think (and Warren would probably know better than I) that a Royal Duke outranks a Prince.. I.e The Duke of York outranks Prince Michael of Kent.

Thus, there is a definite distinction between a royal duke and a non royal duke.
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 09-27-2006, 11:34 PM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Empress
Well, I think (and Warren would probably know better than I) that a Royal Duke outranks a Prince.. I.e The Duke of York outranks Prince Michael of Kent.

Thus, there is a definite distinction between a royal duke and a non royal duke.
What we are really talking about here is precedence. Official Precedence in England and Scotland is "laid down" by law and precedent and for the Royal Family it is pretty straightforward: The Sovereign, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Prince of Wales (and spouse), etc. So the title as such is not really relevant. For example, the Earl of Wessex has higher 'ranking' than the Duke of Gloucester because Edward is the son of a Sovereign; both are Royal Highnesses, and normally a Duke outranks an Earl, but in this case the title is not the determinant. Similarly, before his marriage Edward was plain Prince Edward, but still outranked the Duke of Gloucester because of his proximity to the Sovereign.

In the Official Precedence non-Royal Dukes (as the Earl of Ulster will be when he inherits the Duke of Gloucester title from his father) are down the list behind the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, the PM and various politicians, High Commissioners and Ambassadors and the Great Officers of State.

The problem is that we are starting to mix up the different subjects of Royal titles and precedence. While precedence is usually determined by title (from office or birth), as ever the immediate Royal Family is different, being at the top of the pyramid.

For those interested in the more arcane detail, we have the Order of Precedence thread, all 18 pages of it.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 09-28-2006, 07:26 AM
Empress's Avatar
Empress Empress is offline
Administrator
Picture of the Month Advisor
Book Club Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ridgefield, United States
Posts: 2,376
Default

Thanks Warren! I knew you could solve it!
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 10-05-2006, 08:03 AM
Akela Akela is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Posts: 1
Default

The following question popped in my head last week and I wasn't able to finde the answer online, so but I have a feeling, that someone here has the answer.

The second son on the british king / queen has the title "Duke of York", currently it's Andrew. So, when will Harry become "Duke of York"? When his father becomes king? When Andrews dies? If before - what happens to Andrew and his daughters?

Thanks for the answer,
Akela
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 10-05-2006, 08:43 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,720
Default

Once you are granted a royal dukedom, it remains in your family line and continues to pass down through the eldest son. Since Andrew has no sons, the dukedom of York will return to the Crown after his death. It is possible, however, for a royal warrant to be issued allowing Beatrice to inherit the dukedom in her own right.

Harry is likely to marry before Andrew dies and will be granted another dukedom (Cambridge or Sussex) by The Queen or his father.

Last edited by branchg; 10-05-2006 at 08:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-22-2006, 01:49 PM
SweetHomeNC's Avatar
SweetHomeNC SweetHomeNC is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 36
Default What would William and Harry's titles have been if Charles had died?

Would they have stayed Princes of Wales or would they become The Prince William or The Prince Harry? If they lost the Wales title, would William go by the Duke of Cornwall title and Harry be given some other dukedom?

Last edited by SweetHomeNC; 11-22-2006 at 06:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-22-2006, 09:58 PM
SweetHomeNC's Avatar
SweetHomeNC SweetHomeNC is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 36
Default

I'm even more confused now, because I read that William would not get the Duke of Cornwall title if Charles died before the Queen. I thought it was the Prince of Wales title that he wouldn't get, unless the Queen gave him the title, but the Duchy of Cornwall title automatically went to the heir.
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 11-22-2006, 10:16 PM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
BeatrixFan BeatrixFan is offline
Majesty
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,433
Default

William and Harry will always be Prince William of Wales and Prince Harry of Wales because that was their birth title. They're not "The Prince William" or "The Prince Harry" and won't be until their father is King. If Charles died before being King, they would never be The Prince William/Harry. If Charles died before becoming King, Prince William would become Duke of Cornwall, Rothesay etc etc but NOT the Prince of Wales. He would have to be invested as Prince of Wales. As I understand it, William would become the Duke of Cornwall as soon as Charles died.
__________________
Doing an Edith Piaf.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 11-22-2006, 10:24 PM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline