 |
|

03-21-2005, 02:18 AM
|
 |
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 13
|
|
|
Questions about future Queens, Dowagers and surviving spouses
i have a quick question
let's say William becomes king after Charles and marries a woman who then becomes queen (consort), but Will dies without having any children. So then the throne passes to Harry, who is also married, and who then becomes king. Does William's wife continue to be called 'queen'? Does she give this title up to Harry's wife??
sorry that might be a silly question but i was just wondering! :)
|

03-21-2005, 05:23 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,452
|
|
|
William's widow, as a Queen Consort, would be the "Dowager Queen", just as Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth were. However, she would most likely be known as "Queen xxx" in general usage.
Queen Mary was still "Queen Mary" after George V died, and Queen Elizabeth was still Queen Elizabeth, although called "Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother" after the death of George VI.
Harry's wife would probably just be referred to as "The Queen".
|

03-21-2005, 10:58 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,900
|
|
|
If William predeceases his wife, whether he's succeeded by his brother or a son or daughter of his own, his wife will still be known as Queen, since that was her title when she was widowed. If a child of hers becomes king or queen, she'd be Queen Mother (whether she used the title or not - much as Queen Elizabeth did and Queen Mary didn't); if her husband was succeeded by another family member, she'd become Queen Dowager. I read somewhere that a Queen Mother has more rights than a Queen Dowager (a fact that was supposed to have pleased Queen Mary after George V's death), but it didn't go into details about what those rights were.
|

03-22-2005, 12:24 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,459
|
|
|
dont let Camilla become Queen i cant believe she did! but i wanted William become King!
Sara Boyce
|

03-22-2005, 01:25 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,452
|
|
|
Precedence
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
I read somewhere that a Queen Mother has more rights than a Queen Dowager (a fact that was supposed to have pleased Queen Mary after George V's death), but it didn't go into details about what those rights were.
|
I think it would just be in order of precedence.
If there were three Queens living, as for example, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, and [Dowager] Queen Mary from February 1952 to March 1953, the order of precendence would be in that order.
Queen Mary would have been "Queen Mother" during the reigns of Edward VIII and George VI, before being "relegated" to Queen Dowager, aka Queen Mary, when Elizabeth II came to the Throne.
.
|

03-22-2005, 05:50 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,226
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
If William predeceases his wife, whether he's succeeded by his brother or a son or daughter of his own, his wife will still be known as Queen, since that was her title when she was widowed. If a child of hers becomes king or queen, she'd be Queen Mother (whether she used the title or not - much as Queen Elizabeth did and Queen Mary didn't); if her husband was succeeded by another family member, she'd become Queen Dowager. I read somewhere that a Queen Mother has more rights than a Queen Dowager (a fact that was supposed to have pleased Queen Mary after George V's death), but it didn't go into details about what those rights were.
|
Why would they have different rights?
|

03-22-2005, 08:06 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,900
|
|
|
I have no idea why they would, but apparently it's something that Queen Mary discovered and was pleased that she had more rights as a Queen Mother than she would have had as just a Queen Dowager.
|

03-24-2005, 05:14 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
I have no idea why they would, but apparently it's something that Queen Mary discovered and was pleased that she had more rights as a Queen Mother than she would have had as just a Queen Dowager.
|
Perhaps it is that as Queen Mother you are a blood relative of the current monarch, but as Queen Dowager you are not blood related to the monarch.
|

03-24-2005, 06:25 PM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 6,996
|
|
|
A Queen Mother is also a Queen Dowager. A Queen Mother is the mother of the monarch. A Queen Dowager is the wife of a deceased King. A Queen Mother must have been a Queen first and therefore the wife of a deceased King but a Queen Dowager is not necessarily the mother of the monarch.
The last time that Britain had a Queen Dowager who was not also a Queen Mother was when Queen Victoria became Queen and Queen Adelaide was still alive. Queen Adelaide was a Queen Dowager only but later Queens such as Alexandra, Mary and Elizabeth were both Queen Dowagers and Queen Mothers during the reigns of their child(ren).
|

03-24-2005, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chrissy57
A Queen Mother is also a Queen Dowager. A Queen Mother is the mother of the monarch. A Queen Dowager is the wife of a deceased King. A Queen Mother must have been a Queen first and therefore the wife of a deceased King but a Queen Dowager is not necessarily the mother of the monarch.
The last time that Britain had a Queen Dowager who was not also a Queen Mother was when Queen Victoria became Queen and Queen Adelaide was still alive. Queen Adelaide was a Queen Dowager only but later Queens such as Alexandra, Mary and Elizabeth were both Queen Dowagers and Queen Mothers during the reigns of their child(ren).
|
Thank you for clearing that up!
|

03-24-2005, 10:18 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,226
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chrissy57
A Queen Mother is also a Queen Dowager. A Queen Mother is the mother of the monarch. A Queen Dowager is the wife of a deceased King. A Queen Mother must have been a Queen first and therefore the wife of a deceased King but a Queen Dowager is not necessarily the mother of the monarch.
The last time that Britain had a Queen Dowager who was not also a Queen Mother was when Queen Victoria became Queen and Queen Adelaide was still alive. Queen Adelaide was a Queen Dowager only but later Queens such as Alexandra, Mary and Elizabeth were both Queen Dowagers and Queen Mothers during the reigns of their child(ren).
|
That took a moment to comprehend, but that really does make sense.
|

03-24-2005, 11:18 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,900
|
|
|
It still doesn't explain what extra rights a queen mother has that a queen dowager doesn't have, though. As Warren said, it probably has something to do with precedence, but there may be more to it.
If Charles becomes king and Camilla outlives him, we may see what happens to queen dowagers in reality rather than just talking hypothetically.
|

03-25-2005, 01:00 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,390
|
|
|
I always understood that the title "Queen Mother" was created for Queen Elizabeth as she did not wish to be known as Queen Dowager and to avoid confusion with her Daughter Queen Elizabeth II. Prior to that Queen Mary & Queen Alexandra were known only by their names rather than by a title.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
|

03-25-2005, 01:31 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 6,996
|
|
|
You are correct that the title Queen Mother was created for the late Queen Mum but the other ladies were also Queen Mothers as well as Queen Dowagers while Queen Adelaide wasn't.
I don't really think there is that much difference in status relating to a queen mother against a Queen Dowager except that a queen mother would have certain access rights to their child and status coming from that relationship that may not exist for a Queen Dowager.
When I get some time, and that won't be any time soon unfortunately, I will research the activities of Queen Adelaide and compare them with the later Queen's after the deaths of their husbands and kings.
|

03-26-2005, 10:15 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,226
|
|
|
Well, most Queen mothers don't have much say, do they?
|

04-07-2005, 10:10 AM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 54
|
|
|
Around the time of the beginning of Queen Elizabeth's reign after her father-King George VI- died, Queen Mary was still alive, Mary was known as "Queen Dowager" and since the elder Queen Elizabeth couldn't have that title and she didn't want people to be confused with the present Queen and she was QE's mother, she called herself the "Queen Mother" or "Queen Mum" for short and it stuck thereafter..... :)
__________________
History is powerful stuff. One day your world is fine. The next day it's knocked for a metaphysical loop. Was Napoleon really at Waterloo? Would that change for what I had for breakfast? - Anonymous
|

04-07-2005, 11:07 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,508
|
|
|
hmmm...i wonder what camilla will be called if charles dies while he is king and leaves her as a widow. I am sure it will be dowager queen. surely it won't be queen mum...no way
__________________
*Under Construction*
|

04-07-2005, 02:19 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,459
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reina
hmmm...i wonder what camilla will be called if charles dies while he is king and leaves her as a widow. I am sure it will be dowager queen. surely it won't be queen mum...no way
|
i agree it!
but let William become King but Camilla will known as Princess of Consort because Camilla and Charles is divorcees!
Sara Boyce
|

04-07-2005, 02:30 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 6,960
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reina
hmmm...i wonder what camilla will be called if charles dies while he is king and leaves her as a widow. I am sure it will be dowager queen. surely it won't be queen mum...no way
|
Camilla would have to be the mother of the future monarch in order to be called Queen Mum.
|

04-07-2005, 02:33 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,459
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mandy
Camilla would have to be the mother of the future monarch in order to be called Queen Mum.
|
oh my gosh!
Sara Boyce
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|