The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2821  
Old 12-13-2015, 08:29 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
Well that isn't fair either. If you are going to change, make it gender neutral and oldest inherits like they did for the succession.
I will allow Lord Trefgarne, who moved the Bill, to explain:

"There are two other points that I would like to make. First, a number of your Lordships asked me why I do not propose that hereditary peerages simply descend through the oldest child, come what may. Speaking personally, I would have no particular objection to such an arrangement. But the plain fact is that that proposition has been before Parliament on several occasions and has on each of those occasions failed to attract your Lordships’ support. I therefore propose a more modest arrangement. Modernisation of the hereditary peerage should now begin and it is for that reason that I bring this modest proposal before your Lordships. Thus it is that the purpose of the Bill is to authorise succession through the female line in those circumstances where the peerage would otherwise disappear. I hope that your Lordships will agree that this proposition is right and proper in the present circumstances and will agree to the Bill."

This is from the Second Reading Speech, a link to which I included in Post No. 2795 above, to which I refer you. The Speech is worth reading.
__________________

__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2822  
Old 12-13-2015, 08:36 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 968
His 'foot in the door' approach is not worth the effort.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2823  
Old 12-13-2015, 08:37 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 4,408
Quote:
Thus it is that the purpose of the Bill is to authorise succession through the female line in those circumstances where the peerage would otherwise disappear.
Probably one of the reasons parliament has refused to act on peerages is because this provision has always been possible. The Queen can created a peerage with whatever remainder she wants.

William's dukedom could have been created so females can inherit without any action from parliament.
Reply With Quote
  #2824  
Old 12-13-2015, 09:17 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
But that is just leaving everything to the monarch and deal with these matters one at a time. Further, it does not permit change to take place to reflect the changes in society generally. I think HM is biased, and far too concerned about tradition and not concerned enough with broader issues like equality. Which isn't surprising considering who she is and how she's lived, but there needs to be a way to effect change within the extant system, and this proposal at least gets the ball rolling.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2825  
Old 12-13-2015, 09:22 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,347
William's dukedom was never meant to be inherited. More than likely it merges with the crown.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2826  
Old 12-13-2015, 09:41 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 4,408
Right but its possible that it doesn't however unlikely that may be.

Andrew is the Queen's 'favourite' son. When she created his dukedom it was with the standard remainder of 'heirs male' - There is no statute to prevent the creating of a peerage with the remainder of 'heirs of the body' which would allow Beatrice to inherit.

Unlike Succession, the granting of honours is an area where royal prerogative matters.

If parliament wants to legislate it that's up to them.
Reply With Quote
  #2827  
Old 12-13-2015, 09:50 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 6,660
I could see peerage titles and their remainders being a big issue if creating hereditary peers weren't just about a thing of the past. Its my understanding that most peerages that are created these days are lifetime ones that really need no remainders.

As time goes by, more and more of the hereditary peerages are going to become more of a rarity. As far as I know, there are only two hereditary peerages that are on the plate to be issued in the near future. One being a dukedom for Harry when he marries and the second being Edward being created Duke of Edinburgh once all the prerequisites are met and Philip's title merges with the Crown.

Does this make sense or am I too far out in left field?
__________________
“When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”
― John Lennon
Reply With Quote
  #2828  
Old 12-13-2015, 10:56 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
It's definitely possible that William's Dukedom could be inherited. If William and Kate were to have another son, and if George were to die young, the other son would inherit the title and Charlotte would become Queen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I could see peerage titles and their remainders being a big issue if creating hereditary peers weren't just about a thing of the past. Its my understanding that most peerages that are created these days are lifetime ones that really need no remainders.

As time goes by, more and more of the hereditary peerages are going to become more of a rarity. As far as I know, there are only two hereditary peerages that are on the plate to be issued in the near future. One being a dukedom for Harry when he marries and the second being Edward being created Duke of Edinburgh once all the prerequisites are met and Philip's title merges with the Crown.

Does this make sense or am I too far out in left field?
Makes perfect sense to me. I like the idea that most peerages be for the recipient's lifetime only. That way the person who did whatever it was that earned them recognition is the one who gets the benefit, not those down the track who did nothing to earn it.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2829  
Old 12-13-2015, 11:16 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,347
For William's dukedom to be inherited, he would have to die before he became King. That's a possibility but hopefully it doesn't happen.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2830  
Old 12-13-2015, 11:43 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
That's a given. No-one's hoping for it to happen, but it's not outside the realms of possibility that he and George could both die during Charles' lifetime. Helicopter crash, car crash, fall from horse, illness. All possible.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2831  
Old 12-14-2015, 09:29 PM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 524
I am not sure what changes would be made, especially with the York title. That one has always stayed close to the senior family. QE2's father, and grandfather were both Ds of Y. It pretty much went to the spares, but always made it back. Changing it to males or females could see it gone for a very long time. What happens if the oldest female is heir apparent, but the oldest male is to become Duke of Cornwall? Two generations, and the duchy could be completely out of the line of succession. Could become quite the kurfuffle.
Reply With Quote
  #2832  
Old 12-14-2015, 09:52 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,347
To be the Duke of Cornwall, you have to be both the eldest son of the monarch and heir apparent. If you aren't both, then there is no Duke until the criteria is filled. For example, Charles dies tomorrow, William is the heir apparent but not Duke of Cornwall because Andrew would then be the eldest son. Andrew can't be Duke of Cornwall because he isn't the heir apparent.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2833  
Old 12-14-2015, 10:02 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by padams2359 View Post
I am not sure what changes would be made, especially with the York title. That one has always stayed close to the senior family. QE2's father, and grandfather were both Ds of Y. It pretty much went to the spares, but always made it back. Changing it to males or females could see it gone for a very long time. What happens if the oldest female is heir apparent, but the oldest male is to become Duke of Cornwall? Two generations, and the duchy could be completely out of the line of succession. Could become quite the kurfuffle.

But does any of it really matter? The sun will still rise tomorrow if there is no Duke of York. Changed circumstances, new rules. Legislation could cure the Duchy of Cornwall problem so the heir still has the income.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2834  
Old 12-14-2015, 10:38 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
But does any of it really matter? The sun will still rise tomorrow if there is no Duke of York. Changed circumstances, new rules. Legislation could cure the Duchy of Cornwall problem so the heir still has the income.

When there is no Duke, the duchy of Cornwall money goes to the monarch. The heir would get funded but through the monarch instead of direct from the Duchy.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2835  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:22 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by padams2359 View Post
I am not sure what changes would be made, especially with the York title. That one has always stayed close to the senior family. QE2's father, and grandfather were both Ds of Y. It pretty much went to the spares, but always made it back. Changing it to males or females could see it gone for a very long time. What happens if the oldest female is heir apparent, but the oldest male is to become Duke of Cornwall? Two generations, and the duchy could be completely out of the line of succession. Could become quite the kurfuffle.
Every time the DoY title has been created it's been with the intention/assumption that it would be passed on - circumstances have simply prevented it from being passed on. The Queen's father and grandfather were both second sons who ended up becoming King (and in the Queen's father's case, the title would have become extinct anyways as he had no sons). Before that is Prince Frederick, who had no children, Prince Edward, who never married, and Prince Ernest Augustus, who also never married. Continuing back, you have James II, another second son who ended up becoming King. His father, Charles II, was also a second son Duke of York who became King, as was Henry VIII. The DoY before him was Richard of Shrewsbury, the younger son of Edward IV, who died in the Tower with his brother. Then you have Edward IV himself, who became King. The only time a Duke of York has been inherited is in it's 1st creation - Edmund, son of Edward III, was succeeded by his son, Edward, who was succeeded by his nephew, Richard, who was succeeded by his son, Edward, who became king.

I'm fairly certain that when QEII made her second son Duke of York it wasn't with the hope that he would either become King through some circumstances or die without children, like his predecessors.

That said, I believe ever Dukedom created for the children of Sophia of Hanover, George I, George II, George III, Victoria, or Edward VII, except for the Dukedom of Cumberland and Teviotdale and the Dukedom of Albany (which were suspended in 1919) have either been merged with the crown or gone extinct. And of the 4 Dukedoms created for the sons of George V, only 2 are still used today.
Reply With Quote
  #2836  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:23 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
When there is no Duke, the duchy of Cornwall money goes to the monarch. The heir would get funded but through the monarch instead of direct from the Duchy.
Yes, but in the hypothetical situation raised there was an eldest son of the monarch, and therefore a Duke of Cornwall, but he was not the heir. The Duchy is supposed to fund the heir, but if the heir is a woman and not the Duke, then those funds need to be made available to the heir, not the Duke. Hence the need for legislation.
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2837  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:31 PM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 3,347
You have to be both. The eldest son and the heir apparent to be the Duke of Cornwall. It doesn't follow the rules of a regular dukedom. If George and Charlotte's birth order were switched. Charlotte is the heir apparent when William is king but George doesn't become the Duke of Cornwall when William is King. He is still just Prince George. In real life, George like William will become Dukes of Cornwall if no ones dies unexpectedly. When Charles is King, William is DoC, same for George when William is King.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2838  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:32 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 968
To be Duke of Cornwall two conditions must be met. 1. Oldest son of Monarch 2. You need to be 1st in-line for the throne.

If the son has an elder sister he would be 2nd in-line. That would disqualify him from getting the title.
Reply With Quote
  #2839  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:35 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
Yes, but in the hypothetical situation raised there was an eldest son of the monarch, and therefore a Duke of Cornwall, but he was not the heir. The Duchy is supposed to fund the heir, but if the heir is a woman and not the Duke, then those funds need to be made available to the heir, not the Duke. Hence the need for legislation.
You can have a heir apparent who isn't the Duke, but not a Duke who isn't heir apparent.

The title isn't inheritable; in order to be it, you have to be both the heir apparent and the Monarch's eldest son. This should be changed so that the holder of the Duchy is both the heir apparent and the monarch's eldest child, but as it stands now the funds from it are always going to go either to the heir apparent or to the monarch - never to the monarch's second child who is further down the line of succession.
Reply With Quote
  #2840  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:36 PM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 3,937
OK. Thanks, everyone. That sorts that out, then.

Still mightn't be a bad idea to introduce legislation to deal with the Duchy now we have abolished male primogeniture for the succession. The legislation that is currently in Parliament would not cure the problem as it still provides that all male siblings have priority over female and a female would only take the title if there were no males.
__________________

__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, consort, spouse, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titles and Styles of Harry, his Future Wife and Children Aussie Princess Prince Harry and Prince William 1353 11-17-2016 02:00 PM
Styles and Titles Nahla10 Ruling Family of Dubai 38 09-17-2016 06:06 AM
Diana's Styles and Titles florawindsor Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 749 06-29-2016 07:02 PM
Non-British Styles and Titles Lord Sosnowitz Royal Ceremony and Protocol 729 10-09-2014 05:24 PM
Abdication Beatrix and Inauguration WA: Titles, Names, Succession, Precedence Princess Robijn King Willem-Alexander, Queen Máxima and family 67 05-24-2013 04:14 PM




Popular Tags
ascot 2016 best gown best gown september 2016 best hat best holiday outfit best outfit catherine middleton style corbyn countess of wessex's style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events denmark royals duchess of cambridge dutch state visit e-mail fashion poll grand duke jean greece kate middleton king abdullah ii king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand nobel gala norway november 2016 october 2016 october november 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week prince bernhard prince charles princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen mathildes outfits queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania royal fashion september 2016 state visit state visit to denmark succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises