The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2641  
Old 04-25-2015, 11:23 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,189
That is true. The 'pattern' was set by HRH Princess Patricia of Connaught. When she married the Hon. Alexander Ramsay (younger son of the 13th Earl of Dalhousie), she voluntarily relinquished the title of Princess of Great Britain and Ireland and the style Royal Highness, and assumed the style Lady Patricia Ramsay. Her only child had no title (Alexander Ramsay of Mar).

The following was HRH Princess Alexandra of Kent. When she married the Hon. Angus Ogilvy, the last refused an offered earldom because -as a younger son- he could not lead the lifestyle of an Earl. Her children have no title (James and Bruce Ogilvie).

The following was HRH The Princess Anne. When she married with Captain Mark Phillips, the last refused an offered earldom as well. Her children have no title (Peter and Zara Phillips).

The only exception on this pattern was when HRH The Princess Margaret married Antony Armstrong-Jones. Back then the royal family was still very small. The Princess Margaret was a very core royal. Due to concerns over the prospect of a British princess giving birth to a child without a title, Antony was offered the earldom of Snowdon and the viscounty of Linley. Now in 2015 this will no longer happen, I expect. Maybe when the eldest daughter -and heiress- of Prince William would have been a female, yes, then her future husband would most likely have been created a Peer by her grandfather Charles or father William.

It indeed was not Princess Anne's or Prince Andrew's choice that the one's children have no title but the other's have. It was a choice by Prince Edward however to "deny" his children with the royal title which is automatically theirs.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2642  
Old 04-25-2015, 11:26 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
That is correct. When nothing happens, James, the present Viscount Severn, will become the 2nd Earl of Wessex as only heir of the male body of the present Earl. When -according to plan- his father will become the 1st Duke of Edinburgh of a new creation, he will become the Earl of Wessex as heir to his father's Dukedom. But still we will have to see: will he be known as HRH The Earl of Wessex (to which he is entitled) or as James Mountbatten-Windsor, Earl of Wessex (like his far-away cousins the Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster and George Windsor, Earl of St Andrews). After all, James is already not known with his rightful title (Prince) and is not addressed accordingly his correct rank (HRH).

James wouldn't be known as HRH The Earl of Wessex while the heir to the Edinburgh Dukedom. He would be either HRH Prince James of Edinburgh OR the Earl of Wessex but not both.

Go back to 1935 when the then Duke of Kent had a son. That son wasn't known as HRH The Earl of St Andrews but as HRH Prince Edward of Kent until his father died when he inherited the title and became HRH The Duke of Kent.

Same thing with the Gloucester title. While the old Duke was alive neither of his sons, while the heir to the dukedom, were known as HRH The Earl of Ulster but were known as HRH Prince William of Gloucester and HRH Prince Richard of Gloucester. On the death of his father Prince Richard became HRH The Duke of Gloucester.


When the heir is a HRH Prince in his own right they don't use the courtesy title. The sons of the Dukes of Kent and Gloucester use it because they aren't HRHs.


James uses the courtesy title to Wessex now because he isn't using HRH Prince James of Wessex (assuming he is even entitled to that designation and I am not going to get involved in that debate again knowing the two sides - 1. that only new LPs can strip them of the HRH and 2. that all that is needed is for the Queen's will to be made known and that is what has happened). If he was using the HRH then there would be no use of the Severn title for a few more generations assuming Edward is created Duke of Edinburgh as intended.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2643  
Old 04-26-2015, 02:46 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,150
I might be wrong but I don't think that James becomes the 2nd Earl of Wessex when his father is made DoE. It's still Edward's title and James's use is only a courtesy so he doesn't change the the number until he inherits in his own right.

George is another example of HRH trumping courtesy title. If not a Prince, he would just been using his father's earldom as courtesy title.

If George was a girl, her future husband wouldn't just be offered a peerage but most likely made a Duke and a Prince since he would be the future consort to a Queen like what happened to Philip (granted he was made a HRH at wedding and Prince later on)


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2644  
Old 04-26-2015, 04:40 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
Totally agree.


James wouldn't be the 2nd Earl of Wessex until his father dies. Until then, any title he uses, including Viscount Severn is as a courtesy. The substantive holder of the Severn title is still Prince Edward with James using it as a courtesy only.


If Edward eventually is created Duke of Edinburgh, he will be the 1st holder of the 4th creation of the title and James the 2nd. In time James will also be the 2nd holder of the 5th creation of Edinburgh and 2nd of the 1st creation of Wessex and Severn.
Reply With Quote
  #2645  
Old 04-28-2015, 06:16 AM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Totally agree.


James wouldn't be the 2nd Earl of Wessex until his father dies. Until then, any title he uses, including Viscount Severn is as a courtesy. The substantive holder of the Severn title is still Prince Edward with James using it as a courtesy only.


If Edward eventually is created Duke of Edinburgh, he will be the 1st holder of the 4th creation of the title and James the 2nd. In time James will also be the 2nd holder of the 5th creation of Edinburgh and 2nd of the 1st creation of Wessex and Severn.

If Edward is 1st holder of the 4th creation of DoE, wouldn't James be the 2nd holder of the 4th creation, not the 5th creation?
Reply With Quote
  #2646  
Old 04-28-2015, 07:04 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 18,853
I think it's because the title has to get re-created for James. Hence 5th creation.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #2647  
Old 04-28-2015, 07:42 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,150
It doesn't have to be recreated for James but for Edward. Philip is the 3rd Creation Duke and his heir would be Charles, William and then George, but when Philip and the Queen die and Charles becomes King, the dukedom merges with the Crown and can be reissued to Edward as the 4th creation. James is Edward's heir so he would get it automatically when his father dies. It doesn't have to be recreated.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #2648  
Old 04-28-2015, 07:45 AM
Tilia C.'s Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: O, Germany
Posts: 5,056
Sorry, I don't understand. Why would the DoE title have to be recreated for James? Wouldn't he just inherit it from his father and therefore be 2nd?
__________________
Please vote in our TRF Fashion Polls


Reply With Quote
  #2649  
Old 04-28-2015, 08:18 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
Simple answer - I made a typo.


Edward will be the first holder of the 4th creation and James will be the 2nd holder of the 4th creation when he inherits the title from his father.
Reply With Quote
  #2650  
Old 04-28-2015, 09:02 AM
Molly2101's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,430
I really hope Charles gives Edward the DoE title upon his accession to the Crown as Edward deserves the title.

James as everyone is saying will be the 2nd holder of the 4th creation, but he wont be HRH The Duke of Edinburgh - he will simply be His Grace, The Duke of Edinburgh (although the more I think about the more I like HRH Prince James of Edinburgh, but that wont ever happen.)
__________________
"I am yours, you are mine, of that be sure. You are locked in my heart, the little key is lost and now you must stay there forever."
Written by Princess Alix of Hesse and by Rhine in the diary of her fiance, Tsarevich Nicholas.
Reply With Quote
  #2651  
Old 04-28-2015, 05:24 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
Charles has to wait until both his parents are dead before he can consider giving Edward the title as he has to inherit it first.


I know it is more likely that Philip will go first but we really can't assume that, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #2652  
Old 04-28-2015, 06:52 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
it was written along time ago after Edward got married that one Phillip passes on he get the title
Reply With Quote
  #2653  
Old 04-28-2015, 06:57 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
It was stated at the time of the wedding very clearly that when BOTH parents are deceased that the intention is that Charles will recreate the title for Edward.


Until Charles actually inherits the title and then it merges with the Crown it can't be recreated and Charles is the heir apparent to the Edinburgh title, followed by William, George, Harry and Andrew.


If The Queen passes first then Charles becomes King the title will still be Philip's and so he will have to wait.


If Philip passes first then Charles adds Philip's titles to his own until he becomes King and the titles merge with the Crown.
Reply With Quote
  #2654  
Old 04-28-2015, 07:41 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: kenora, Canada
Posts: 54
it was stated at the time of Sophie and Edward marriage that he will get Phillips title on his death so the title will not go back to the crown it will go to Edward
Reply With Quote
  #2655  
Old 04-28-2015, 08:31 PM
JessRulz's Avatar
Administrator
Blog Editor
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,702


Maybe you should have a read of this thread, The future of the Duke of Edinburgh title, because unless Charles, William, George, Harry AND Andrew all die before Philip, Edward won't be inheriting the Edinburgh Dukedom straight from Philip. It doesn't work like that.
__________________
**TRF Rules and FAQ**
Reply With Quote
  #2656  
Old 04-28-2015, 08:49 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by janjan View Post
it was stated at the time of Sophie and Edward marriage that he will get Phillips title on his death so the title will not go back to the crown it will go to Edward

This is the BBC article from the day of the wedding: BBC NEWS | Special Report | 1999 | 06/99 | royal wedding | Wessex titles for Edward and Sophie

It has also been agreed that Edward will also become Duke of Edinburgh after the death of his mother, the Queen, and his father, Prince Philip, who currently holds the dukedom.
Reply With Quote
  #2657  
Old 04-28-2015, 10:06 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,605
I think you are wrong.


You have been saying that the title will pass from Philip to Edward whenever Philip dies.


I am saying that won't happen until both Philip AND the Queen have died.


The BBC says the same as I am saying: after the death of his mother, the Queen, AND his father, Prince Philip, (I have put the AND in capitals although the BBC article from Edward and Sophie's wedding day didn't have that).
Reply With Quote
  #2658  
Old 04-29-2015, 06:14 AM
padams2359's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Orleans, United States
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I think you are wrong.


You have been saying that the title will pass from Philip to Edward whenever Philip dies.


I am saying that won't happen until both Philip AND the Queen have died.


The BBC says the same as I am saying: after the death of his mother, the Queen, AND his father, Prince Philip, (I have put the AND in capitals although the BBC article from Edward and Sophie's wedding day didn't have that).

This is correct. If the Queen dies first, the title is still Phillip's. If Phillip dies first, the title goes to Charles until the Queen dies, the title merges and it can be recreated. At that point, it is not the Queen's to reissue. It it was said any other way, the media was wrong, like they haven't gotten facts backwards before.
Reply With Quote
  #2659  
Old 04-29-2015, 08:24 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,551
What it basically boils down to is that the title of The Duke of Edinburgh needs to merge with the crown and that can't happen until Charles ascends the throne. Once it has, it will be possible for Charles, as monarch, to create his brother as the first The Duke of Edinburgh of the 4th creation as it comes nice and fresh from the crown. The title will then start to be "numbered" as the title passes down from father to oldest son (at least until changes are made for primogeniture with peer titles). If James inherits the title from his father, he would be the 2nd The Duke of Edinburgh of the forth creation and so on down the line. Should James have all girls or no children, on his death, the title would once again merge with the Crown and be open for a fresh new line of the 5th creation.
__________________
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #2660  
Old 04-29-2015, 09:12 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 8,189
Completely correct. The peerages of Prince Philip (Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich) are hereditary for the heirs male of his body:

1 - The Prince Charles, The Prince of Wales
2 - Prince William, The Duke of Cambridge
3 - Prince George of Cambridge
4 - Prince Henry of Wales
5 - The Prince Andrew, The Duke of York
6 - The Prince Edward, The Earl of Wessex
7 - James of Wessex, Viscount Severn

In no any scenario, not when the Queen dies and not when the Duke dies, Edward will be the direct Heir of his father's peerages. Only when by tragic accident the numbers 1 to 5 of this list are suddenly wiped away.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, consort, kate, queenmother, spouse, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diana's Styles and Titles florawindsor Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 808 07-13-2018 02:07 PM
Titles and Styles of Harry, his Future Wife and Children Aussie Princess The Duke and Duchess of Sussex 1897 11-29-2017 03:13 AM
Styles and Titles Nahla10 Ruling Family of Dubai 50 06-02-2017 02:28 PM
Non-British Styles and Titles Lord Sosnowitz Royal Ceremony and Protocol 735 01-30-2017 01:39 PM
Abdication Beatrix and Inauguration WA: Titles, Names, Succession, Precedence Princess Robijn King Willem-Alexander, Queen Máxima and family 67 05-24-2013 03:14 PM




Popular Tags
"chinese gordon" biography camilla chris o'neill cristina crown princess victoria current events family fashion general news germany gloucester grandchild grand duchess maria teresa grand duke jean guillaume harry and meghan hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta pilar infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín jacobite juan carlos king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle news osborn porphyria prince prince charles prince charles; biographies; tom bower prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess claire of luxembourg princess diana princess eleonore princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sibilla princess victoria queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima royal royal ancestry royal family royal geneology royal wedding shaikh zayed bin hamdan bin zayed al nahyan sofia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria visit from sweden wedding



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises