The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2281  
Old 11-12-2013, 10:58 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,986
The Accession Council is ceremonial and their announcement has no legal status. The instant the Queen dies, Charles is King and Camilla is Queen. So even longer in reality. You're right that no one will be creating problems prior to the funeral.
__________________

__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2282  
Old 11-12-2013, 11:00 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippyboo View Post
I don't think so. When the queen dies, there will be an accession council and the announcement of the new King from SJP. Then the lying in state and funeral. That is going to take 7 to 10 days and no politician is going to raise a stink about Camilla during that time period in difference to the late queen. Plus William and Harry will treat Camilla as the Queen.
I know that the world will be busy in morning but I mean the debates will rise leading up to the next Coronation. Trust me, there will be a great deal of debates, stories, official statements, etc, going on. It's not going to be pretty and I think we have to brace ourselves for that.
__________________

__________________
"If you are always trying to be normal you will never know how amazing you can be."

Dr. Maya Angelou
Reply With Quote
  #2283  
Old 11-12-2013, 11:08 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 9,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
There is also some suggestion that the change will have to be ratified by all the Realms, too. I haven't thought much on this though. Bertie, what say you?
As she is the consort I don't think the realms have an issue. They were consulted in 1936 over the abdication but that was to do with the King himself not Wallis.

The real precedent is Anne Boleyn - definitely a figure in the divorce of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon - but she was crowned as Queen in a personal and separate ceremony.
Reply With Quote
  #2284  
Old 11-12-2013, 11:48 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 487
The situation is known now and has been for years.
I expect that broad general policies have already been outlined and agreed upon by those most concerned.
I'm sure there will be no unseemly debate or appearance of dithering :)
Reply With Quote
  #2285  
Old 11-13-2013, 12:16 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364
Most people under the age of about 25 would have very little memory of Diana. As time goes on, this group will become larger and larger.

I think it was wise to use the Duchess of Cornwall title as it would have caused too much of a stir at the time to have a new Princess of Wales, but I don't think the Princess Consort title will come to pass. It won't matter any longer.
Reply With Quote
  #2286  
Old 11-13-2013, 08:32 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 1,119
I agree with yvr girl to a point. As time goes on, Diana's memory will continue to fade into history. For most people life goes on but there will always be some people who will insist on reliving the past.

The more interesting question is whether William and Catherine will become the Prince and Princess of Wales. Obviously, people would begin to associate the title with Catherine rather than Diana, which is the way it should be.

Personally, for reasons that have nothing to do with Camilla, I think the male and female consort should adopt equivalent titles. Philip is known as "Prince Consort" and Camilla and Catherine should be known as "Princess Consort" when the time comes.
Reply With Quote
  #2287  
Old 11-13-2013, 09:48 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 4,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baroness of Books View Post
Absolutely, and this seems the strongest case that Camilla will be Queen Consort. Why is she less deserving than her predecessors who carried the title just because a certain segment of the population can't accept her as the wife of a king? How many Queen Consorts throughout British history based on that would have then been denied the title because of their unpopularity? Quite a few, I'd wager. Camilla should not go down in history as being denied a rightful title because of such discrimination.
As we're going down this road again, I kind of find it ironic that should Parliament pass legislation to allow the title of Princess Consort for Camilla, she will have attained something that no royal spouse has. She would be Princess Camilla in her own right. No Queen Consort has ever attained that. To me, that would be a slap in the face to those that have gone before her.
__________________
“We live in a world where we have to hide to make love, while violence is practiced in broad daylight.”
~~~ John Lennon ~~~
Reply With Quote
  #2288  
Old 11-13-2013, 09:53 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher View Post

Personally, for reasons that have nothing to do with Camilla, I think the male and female consort should adopt equivalent titles. Philip is known as "Prince Consort" and Camilla and Catherine should be known as "Princess Consort" when the time comes.
Why not King Consort and Queen Consort? It is sexist to assume that King trumps Queen.
Reply With Quote
  #2289  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:07 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ipswich, United Kingdom
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvr girl View Post
Why not King Consort and Queen Consort? It is sexist to assume that King trumps Queen.
I always thought the title King Consort should be created nowadays. I never why everyone downgrades the woman's title why not upgrade the mens.
Reply With Quote
  #2290  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:09 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvr girl View Post
Why not King Consort and Queen Consort? It is sexist to assume that King trumps Queen.
Except that's the way it goes, always has done and if people want to continually view tradition as sexist then I'll continue to laugh. Doesn't harm anyone, nobody cares, people just use the word sexist to their advantage. Think Philip minds not being Prince Consort?

Catherine will be Queen Consort, Camilla will be Queen Consort and any future husband of a Queen Regnant depending upon the government and the husband might be a Prince Consort.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #2291  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:19 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalistbert View Post
I always thought the title King Consort should be created nowadays. I never why everyone downgrades the woman's title why not upgrade the mens.
I think we should downgrade the title because the consort takes his or her title from the monarch. It makes more sense to me for the consort to take a lesser title. As Yvr Girl points out, the current disparity was created on the sexist assumption that a wife is subordinate to her husband. In a monarchy, everyone is subordinate to the monarch and that should be reflected in the spouse's title.
Reply With Quote
  #2292  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:28 AM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher View Post
...I think the male and female consort should adopt equivalent titles...
The USA decided what they wanted to call their Head of State and (eventually) their spouse over 230 years ago. I'd like to stick with what we decided over a 1000 yrs ago, and I think the majority of the UK and other realms would agree.

I'm tired of hearing that change is necessary because something is allegedly sexist, religious (as opposed to non-secular) or traditional.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #2293  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:36 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalistbert View Post
I always thought the title King Consort should be created nowadays. I never why everyone downgrades the woman's title why not upgrade the mens.
England had one king-consort. Not best memories. Next queen chose to be unmarried.
Reply With Quote
  #2294  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:46 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by cepe View Post
The USA decided what they wanted to call their Head of State and (eventually) their spouse over 230 years ago. I'd like to stick with what we decided over a 1000 yrs ago, and I think the majority of the UK and other realms would agree.

I'm tired of hearing that change is necessary because something is allegedly sexist, religious (as opposed to non-secular) or traditional.
I'm sorry, you're right. It is your monarchy. I'm just an interested observer. I used the word "we" in response to the post asking why the title should be downgraded.

That said, it is my opinion, that since a woman may now inherit the throne in her own right, the issue of parity between a male consort versus a female consort will come up--although hopefully not in my lifetime. You guys have plenty of time to figure it out.
Reply With Quote
  #2295  
Old 11-13-2013, 10:47 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 2,117
I was just reading Robert Hardman's book about the Queen. There was a discussion about Prince Philip not being named Prince Consort. Other than the fact that Philip never asked for it, it was speculated by the author that the queen did not want the Duke of Edinburgh title to disappear from usage which it would if Philip was Prince Consort due to the happy memories of the time before the accession where she was the Duchess of Edinburgh and could be a naval wife in Malta. Just as in the future, William and Kate will look back fondly on their time as the Duke/Duchess of Cambridge even though it will not be their main title for most of their lives.

The royal titles do not belong to just one person. There were different Prince and Princess of Wales, Princess Royal, Dukes of York, Gloucester, Kent, etc. There is no reason for Charles to not name William as PoW.
Reply With Quote
  #2296  
Old 11-13-2013, 12:51 PM
Dman's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,134
I think we have to face that the title of HRH The Princess of Wales wasn't designed for Diana. It was a title she gained when marrying Charles and respectfully Camilla decided to not take on the title publically due to the past. I think Catherine will be proud to take on her role as HRH The Princess of Wales when the time comes and carry on carving out her role.
__________________
"If you are always trying to be normal you will never know how amazing you can be."

Dr. Maya Angelou
Reply With Quote
  #2297  
Old 11-13-2013, 01:12 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 487
I agree
Reply With Quote
  #2298  
Old 11-13-2013, 01:23 PM
Nico's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 1,508
Words of wisdom Dman. Just hope it will be shared by many ...
Reply With Quote
  #2299  
Old 11-13-2013, 01:31 PM
HighnessN's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvr girl View Post
Why not King Consort and Queen Consort? It is sexist to assume that King trumps Queen.
I think it has more to do with history. When people talked of "heirs" unfortunately they meant males. I think males getting "lesser" titles when married to a female heir was not make sure that no one assumed that the male was the monarch(which people in the old days and even some today would have assumed if the male was king).

Women inheriting based on birth not sex is a relatively new thing, maybe in the future males will be "king consorts" but I doubt it will happen soon.
Reply With Quote
  #2300  
Old 11-13-2013, 02:03 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 9,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
As we're going down this road again, I kind of find it ironic that should Parliament pass legislation to allow the title of Princess Consort for Camilla, she will have attained something that no royal spouse has. She would be Princess Camilla in her own right. No Queen Consort has ever attained that. To me, that would be a slap in the face to those that have gone before her.

Until fairly recently the Queens' Consort mainly were Princess own name in their own right - by birth.

The Queen Mother wasn't of course but before that we have to go back to the wives of Henry VIII before we have a Queen Consort who wasn't born a princess in her own right - Mary, Alexandra, Adelaide were all princesses before their marriages as were those before them.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
british royal family, consort, spouse, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titles and Styles of Harry, his Future Wife and Children Aussie Princess Prince Harry and Prince William 1115 01-14-2015 02:50 PM
Questions About [non-British] Styles and Titles Lord Sosnowitz Royal Ceremony and Protocol 729 10-09-2014 04:24 PM
Diana's Styles and Titles florawindsor Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 573 11-14-2013 10:59 AM
Styles and Titles Nahla10 Ruling Family of Dubai 36 08-08-2013 12:05 PM
Abdication Beatrix and Inauguration WA: Titles, Names, Succession, Precedence Princess Robijn King Willem-Alexander, Queen Máxima and family 67 05-24-2013 03:14 PM




Popular Tags
australia best outfit camilla chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess catharina-amalia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events death duchess of cornwall fashion fashion poll felipe vi funeral germany hereditary grand duchess stéphanie infanta leonor king abdullah of jordan king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king philippe king willem-alexander letizia maxima nobility official visit photo session picture of the week president hollande prince carl philip prince daniel prince frederik prince of wales princess alexia (2005 -) princess beatrice princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess leonore princess madeleine princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mette-marit princess victoria queen fabiola queen letizia queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima style queen rania queen silvia queen sonja royal fashion sofia hellqvist spanish royals state visit sweden the hague wedding willem-alexander


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2015
Jelsoft Enterprises